Risk analysis by FMEA as an element of analytical validation.

We subjected a Near-Infrared (NIR) analytical procedure used for screening drugs on authenticity to a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), including technical risks as well as risks related to human failure. An FMEA team broke down the NIR analytical method into process steps and identified possible failure modes for each step. Each failure mode was ranked on estimated frequency of occurrence (O), probability that the failure would remain undetected later in the process (D) and severity (S), each on a scale of 1-10. Human errors turned out to be the most common cause of failure modes. Failure risks were calculated by Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs)=O x D x S. Failure modes with the highest RPN scores were subjected to corrective actions and the FMEA was repeated, showing reductions in RPN scores and resulting in improvement indices up to 5.0. We recommend risk analysis as an addition to the usual analytical validation, as the FMEA enabled us to detect previously unidentified risks.

[1]  Mario Capunzo,et al.  A FMEA clinical laboratory case study: how to make problems and improvements measurable. , 2004, Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA.

[2]  James K. Drennen,et al.  Risk Analysis for near Infrared Method Development , 2004 .

[3]  Y Vander Heyden,et al.  Improving method capability of a drug substance HPLC assay. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[4]  Jan S Krouwer,et al.  An improved failure mode effects analysis for hospitals. , 2004, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[5]  R G Kieffer,et al.  Validation and the human element. , 1998, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.