Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: Results of an Overview of Systematic Reviews

Background Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are becoming an impetus for quality health care delivery by nurses. The use of ICTs by nurses can impact their practice, modifying the ways in which they plan, provide, document, and review clinical care. Objective An overview of systematic reviews was conducted to develop a broad picture of the dimensions and indicators of nursing care that have the potential to be influenced by the use of ICTs. Methods Quantitative, mixed-method, and qualitative reviews that aimed to evaluate the influence of four eHealth domains (eg, management, computerized decision support systems [CDSSs], communication, and information systems) on nursing care were included. We used the nursing care performance framework (NCPF) as an extraction grid and analytical tool. This model illustrates how the interplay between nursing resources and the nursing services can produce changes in patient conditions. The primary outcomes included nurses’ practice environment, nursing processes, professional satisfaction, and nursing-sensitive outcomes. The secondary outcomes included satisfaction or dissatisfaction with ICTs according to nurses’ and patients’ perspectives. Reviews published in English, French, or Spanish from January 1, 1995 to January 15, 2015, were considered. Results A total of 5515 titles or abstracts were assessed for eligibility and full-text papers of 72 articles were retrieved for detailed evaluation. It was found that 22 reviews published between 2002 and 2015 met the eligibility criteria. Many nursing care themes (ie, indicators) were influenced by the use of ICTs, including time management; time spent on patient care; documentation time; information quality and access; quality of documentation; knowledge updating and utilization; nurse autonomy; intra and interprofessional collaboration; nurses’ competencies and skills; nurse-patient relationship; assessment, care planning, and evaluation; teaching of patients and families; communication and care coordination; perspectives of the quality of care provided; nurses and patients satisfaction or dissatisfaction with ICTs; patient comfort and quality of life related to care; empowerment; and functional status. Conclusions The findings led to the identification of 19 indicators related to nursing care that are impacted by the use of ICTs. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first attempt to apply NCPF in the ICTs’ context. This broad representation could be kept in mind when it will be the time to plan and to implement emerging ICTs in health care settings. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42014014762; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42014014762 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6pIhMLBZh)

[1]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[2]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[3]  Anne Meißner,et al.  Staff experiences within the implementation of computer-based nursing records in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research , 2014, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[4]  G. Paré,et al.  L'influence des technologies de l'information et des communications sur le maintien en poste des infirmières , 2013 .

[5]  A. Butler,et al.  The future of nursing. Leading change, advancing health. , 2011, Colorado nurse.

[6]  Jean E. Stevenson,et al.  Nurses’ experience of using electronic patient records in everyday practice in acute/inpatient ward settings: A literature review , 2010, Health Informatics J..

[7]  Ana Paula Teixeira de Almeida Vieira Monteiro Cyborgs, biotechnologies, and informatics in health care - new paradigms in nursing sciences. , 2016, Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals.

[8]  S. Sidani,et al.  A theory-driven approach to evaluating quality of nursing care. , 2004, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[9]  Anke J. E. de Veer,et al.  Successful implementation of new technologies in nursing care: a questionnaire survey of nurse-users , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[10]  Pavel S. Roshanov,et al.  Enabling medication management through health information technology (Health IT). , 2011, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[11]  Nicola T. Shaw,et al.  The impact of a Critical Care Information System (CCIS) on time spent charting and in direct patient care by staff in the ICU: A review of the literature , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  L. Aiken,et al.  Hospital restructuring: does it adversely affect care and outcomes? , 2000, The Journal of nursing administration.

[13]  C. Dubois,et al.  Indicators for Evaluating the Performance and Quality of Care of Ambulatory Care Nurses , 2015, Nursing research and practice.

[14]  Paula Asikainen,et al.  The outcomes of regional healthcare information systems in health care: A review of the research literature , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  M. Angelo,et al.  Imaginative construction of care: the nursing professional experience in a remote care service. , 2012, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[16]  M. Gagnon,et al.  Supporting health professionals through information and communication technologies: a systematic review of the effects of information and communication technologies on recruitment and retention. , 2011, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[17]  Marianne Storm,et al.  Virtual Visits in Home Health Care for Older Adults , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[18]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Understanding the implementation and integration of e-health services , 2007 .

[19]  Sharron L Docherty,et al.  Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. , 2011, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[20]  Akers,et al.  Systematic Reviews [ressource électronique]. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2009 .

[21]  J. Grossman,et al.  Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership , 2005 .

[22]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  A. Donabedian Models for Organizing the Delivery of Personal Health Services and Criteria for Evaluating Them , 1972 .

[24]  Pierre Frémont,et al.  Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[25]  M. Gagnon,et al.  L'influence des technologies de l'information et des communications sur le maintien en poste des infirmières The impact of information and communication technologies on nurse retention , 2015 .

[26]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  M. O. Sharif,et al.  Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly. , 2013, Oral health and dental management.

[28]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[29]  E. Tacconelli Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[30]  Nancy L Wilczynski,et al.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[31]  Eileen T Lake,et al.  Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index , 2018 .

[32]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Improving quality of care for persons with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews - what does the evidence tell us? , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[33]  LeMai Nguyen,et al.  Electronic health records implementation: An evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[34]  M. Gagnon,et al.  Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review , 2011, BMC medicine.

[35]  Christine Thrasher,et al.  Nurses' experiences with telephone triage and advice: a meta-ethnography. , 2010, Journal of advanced nursing.

[36]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Structure and Process in Modern Societies , 1961 .

[37]  Charles R Doarn,et al.  National telemedicine initiatives: essential to healthcare reform. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[38]  J. McKenzie,et al.  Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[39]  Sharon Mickan,et al.  Use of handheld computers in clinical practice: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[40]  T. Jones,et al.  Unfinished nursing care: An important performance measure for nursing care systems. , 2016, Nursing outlook.

[41]  J. Carrington,et al.  Nursing Informatics Year in Review , 2013, Nursing administration quarterly.

[42]  Philip Darbyshire,et al.  'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using Computerized Patient Information Systems for clinical information. , 2004, Journal of clinical nursing.

[43]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Dashboards for improving patient care: Review of the literature , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[44]  Kamal Jethwani,et al.  The Effect of Technology-Based Interventions on Pain, Depression, and Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[45]  Renee F Wilson,et al.  Enabling patient-centered care through health information technology. , 2012, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[46]  Dawid Pieper,et al.  Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[47]  Jane M Carrington,et al.  A Systematic Review of Nurses' Experiences With Unintended Consequences When Using the Electronic Health Record , 2015, Nursing administration quarterly.

[48]  M. Clarke,et al.  Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[49]  Guy Paré,et al.  Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[50]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) , 2015, PLoS medicine.

[51]  S. Pouwels,et al.  Technology-based interventions in the treatment of overweight and obesity: A systematic review , 2015, Appetite.

[52]  B. Middel The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review1) , 2008 .

[53]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[54]  S. Kossman,et al.  Nurses' Perceptions of the Impact of Electronic Health Records on Work and Patient Outcomes , 2008, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[55]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  The Rx for Change database: a first-in-class tool for optimal prescribing and medicines use , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[56]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of reminders in improving healthcare professional behavior , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[57]  C. Dubois,et al.  Conceptualizing performance of nursing care as a prerequisite for better measurement: a systematic and interpretive review , 2013, BMC Nursing.

[58]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  The effect of computerized provider order entry systems on clinical care and work processes in emergency departments: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[59]  Josette F. Jones,et al.  Telehealth Interventions to Improve Clinical Nursing of Elders , 2002, Annual Review of Nursing Research.

[60]  U. Malabu,et al.  Role of telehealth in diabetic foot ulcer management - A systematic review. , 2016, The Australian journal of rural health.

[61]  Ivana Cristina Vieira de Lima,et al.  nformation and communication technologies for adherence to ntiretroviral treatment in adults with HIV / AIDS vana , 2016 .

[62]  M. Greenberg,et al.  A comprehensive model of the process of telephone nursing. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[63]  D. Sullivan Technological Advances in Nursing Care Delivery. , 2015, The Nursing clinics of North America.

[64]  Kathryn H. Bowles,et al.  Applying Research Evidence to Optimize Telehomecare , 2007, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[65]  C. Masella,et al.  Systematic review of telemedicine services for patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[66]  P. Willson,et al.  Clinical Decision Support Systems in Nursing: Synthesis of the Science for Evidence-Based Practice , 2008, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[67]  Marie-Pierre Gagnon,et al.  Impacts of information and communication technologies on nursing care: an overview of systematic reviews (protocol) , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[68]  Peter Cram,et al.  Staff acceptance of tele-ICU coverage: a systematic review. , 2011, Chest.

[69]  Helen Roberts,et al.  Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews Final Report , 2005 .

[70]  S. Clarke,et al.  Measuring Actual Scope of Nursing Practice: A New Tool for Nurse Leaders , 2012, The Journal of nursing administration.

[71]  A. Haines,et al.  The Effectiveness of Mobile-Health Technologies to Improve Health Care Service Delivery Processes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[72]  Rebecca Randell,et al.  Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.