Innovation as Response to Emissions Legislation: Revisiting the Automotive Catalytic Converter at Johnson Matthey

Can environmental legislation spur innovative response? This case describes the development of the automotive catalytic converter (ACC) at Johnson Matthey (JM), a precious metals company that entered the automotive industry as a component provider. The market was unfamiliar to JM and highly competitive, but in the 1970s the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) introduced standards for emissions control by automotive companies well ahead of current practice. JM responded to the prospect of market demand for a technology that could meet the regulations. The EPA policy of technology ‘forcing’ stimulated collaboration for innovation among companies from a variety of industries. Our case evidence shows that the key innovator, JM, achieved its breakthrough as a result of proactive R&D management by the product champion together with sustained corporate support at a high level and partnership strategies.

[1]  M. Ivimey Annual report , 1958, IRE Transactions on Engineering Writing and Speech.

[2]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[3]  M. Shelef,et al.  The oxidation of CO by O2 and by NO on supported chromium oxide and other metal oxide catalysts , 1968 .

[4]  A lesson from the smog capital of the world. , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Shelef,et al.  Catalytic steam gasification of graphite: Effects of calcium, strontium, and barium with and without sulfur , 1979 .

[6]  A. F. Diwell,et al.  Car Exhaust Catalysts for Europe THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEAD TOLERANT PLATINUM CATALYST SYSTEMS FOR EMISSION CONTROL , 1981 .

[7]  Tracy R. Lewis,et al.  Protecting the Environment When Costs and Benefits are Privately Known , 1996 .

[8]  A. Mariño Regulation of Performance Standards versus Equipment Specification with Asymmetric Information , 1998 .

[9]  Twenty-Five Years of Autocatalysts , 1999 .

[10]  Jack Doyle Taken for a Ride: Detroit's Big Three and the Politics of Pollution , 2000 .

[11]  J. Robert Mondt Cleaner Cars: The History and Technology of Emission Control Since the 1960s , 2000 .

[12]  F. Veloso,et al.  Make-Buy Decisions in the Auto Industry: New Perspectives on the Role of the Supplier as an Innovator , 2001 .

[13]  K. M. Saunders Patent Nonuse and the Role of Public Interest as a Deterrent to Technology Suppression , 2004 .

[14]  G.J.K. Acres,et al.  The Development of Catalysts for Emission Control from Motor Vehicles: Early Research at Johnson Matthey , 2004 .

[15]  Robbie Burch Scientific and technical developments in automotive emission control since the 1970s - Preface , 2004 .

[16]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Regulation as the Mother of Innovation: The Case of So2 Control , 2005 .

[17]  Clayton D. Forswall,et al.  Clean Air Act Implementation in Houston: An Historical Perspective 1970-2005 , 2005 .

[18]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States , 2005 .

[19]  David Bauner,et al.  Global innovation vs. local regulation: introduction of automotive emission control in Sweden and Europe , 2007 .

[20]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Experiments in technology forcing: Comparing the regulatory processes of US automobile safety and emissions regulations , 2007 .

[21]  Integrated Political Strategy , 2009 .

[22]  R. Nader Unsafe at any speed: the designed in dangers of the American automobile , 2011 .

[23]  R. Nader Unsafe at any speed: the designed-in dangers of the American automobile. 1965. , 1966, American journal of public health.

[24]  The Characterisation of Catalysts A SURVEY OF PRESENT INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE , .