Towards the Development of an Adaptive Enterprise Service System Model

The continuous adaptation of modern enterprises is largely dependent on their underlying adaptive enterprise architecture capability. However, the establishment of an adaptive enterprise architecture capability requires defining the enterprise context before actually commissioning any enterprise architecture or adaptation work. This paper presents the adaptive enterprise service system (AESS) model based on the “Design Science” research method and “Theory Triangulation” approach. The AESS integrates the enterprise context perspectives from three well-known theories of agility, (agent) system, and service science. The AESS model, as a part of the large adaptive enterprise architecture toolkit, defines a modern enterprise as an adaptive enterprise service system. The adaptive enterprise service system is a multi-agent system of service systems that exhibits agility and focuses on the emerging service-centric view as opposed to a traditional product-centric view. The service-centric view of an enterprise is critical for establishing the adaptive enterprise architecture capability for handling complex enterprise transformations.

[1]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution , 2006 .

[2]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[3]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  A Framework to Support Non-fragile Agile Agent-Oriented Software Development , 2006, SoMeT.

[4]  A. Roadmapof A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development , 1995 .

[5]  Asif Gill,et al.  An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[6]  Jeff Magee,et al.  Self-Managed Systems: an Architectural Challenge , 2007, Future of Software Engineering (FOSE '07).

[7]  Michael Luck,et al.  Agent-Based Software Development , 2004 .

[8]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[9]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes , 2007 .

[11]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Design (SSMED): An Emerging Discipline - Outline & References , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sect..

[12]  Rick Dove Agile Enterprise Cornerstones: Knowledge, Values, and Response Ability , 2005, Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion.

[13]  M. Christopher The Agile Supply Chain : Competing in Volatile Markets , 2000 .

[14]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Creating a Dual-Agility Method: The Value of Method Engineering , 2005, J. Database Manag..

[15]  John Gøtze,et al.  Coherency Management: Using Enterprise Architecture for Alignment, Agility, and Assurance , 2008 .

[16]  Julio Clempner,et al.  A Practical Approach to Business Transformation: The Case of the Telecommunication Services of Trinidad and Tobago , 2012 .

[17]  Holger Knublauch,et al.  Extreme programming of multi-agent systems , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[18]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Balancing agility and discipline: evaluating and integrating agile and plan-driven methods , 2004, Proceedings. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[19]  Ricardo Valerdi,et al.  Enterprise Transformation: Why Are We Interested, What Is It, and What Are the Challenges? , 2011 .

[20]  Mark W. Maier,et al.  Architecting Principles for Systems‐of‐Systems , 1996 .

[21]  V A Thurmond,et al.  The point of triangulation. , 2001, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[22]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Toward a conceptual framework of agile methods: a study of agility in different disciplines , 2004, WISER '04.