Distinctiveness and very short-term serial position effects.

The serial position function reflects better memory for the first and last few items in a list than for the middle items. Four experiments examined the effects of temporal spacing on the serial position function for five-item lists that took between 0.5 seconds and 1.1 seconds to present. As with recall of far longer-lasting lists, recency and other robust serial position effects were observed with both free and serial recall. We demonstrate that temporal schedules of presentation control recall probability in predictable ways, and conclude that very fleeting lists obey similar principles as do longer-lasting lists. We compare both sets of findings with predictions from the dimensional distinctiveness framework.

[1]  K. Lashley.  The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[2]  M. Corballis.  Serial order in recognition and recall. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Harcum Er.  Parallel functions of serial learning and tachistoscopic pattern perception. , 1967 .

[4]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[5]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity , 1970 .

[6]  D. Lawrence.  Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation* , 1971 .

[7]  Stephen A. Madigna.  Modality and recall order interactions in short-term memory for serial order. , 1971 .

[8]  R. Bjork,et al.  Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall☆ , 1974 .

[9]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[10]  H. Intraub,et al.  Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[11]  M. Bradley,et al.  A two-process account of long-term serial position effects , 1980 .

[12]  C. Pacifici,et al.  The Effects of a Suffix-Prefix on Forward and Backward Serial Recall , 1983 .

[13]  C. Frankish,et al.  Delayed suffix effect at very short delays. , 1984 .

[14]  R. Cook,et al.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people. , 1985, Science.

[15]  D C Rubin,et al.  Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[16]  R. Greene.  A common basis for recency effects in immediate and delayed recall. , 1986 .

[17]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Sources of recency effects in free recall. , 1986 .

[18]  J R Sehulster.  Content and temporal structure of autobiographical knowledge: Remembering twenty-five seasons at the Metropolitan Opera , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[19]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory. , 1990 .

[20]  James S. Nairne,et al.  Similarity and long-term memory for order , 1990 .

[21]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Relating Theory and Data : Essays on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock , 1991 .

[22]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Where did you park your car? Analysis of a naturalistic long-term recency effect , 1991 .

[23]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Human Memory: Paradigms and Paradoxes , 1992 .

[24]  I. Neath.  Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position function. , 1993 .

[25]  M. Potter.  Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[26]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Intralist distractors and recall direction: Constraints on models of memory for serial order. , 1993 .

[27]  I. Neath.  Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Alicia J. Knoedler,et al.  Distinctiveness and Serial Position Effects in Recognition and Sentence Processing , 1994 .