Structural insights into a new homodimeric self‐activated GTPase family

The human XAB1/MBDin GTPase and its close homologues form one of the ten phylogenetically distinct families of the SIMIBI (after signal recognition particle, MinD and BioD) class of phosphate‐binding loop NTPases. The genomic context and the partners identified for the archaeal and eukaryotic homologues indicate that they are involved in genome maintenance—DNA repair or replication. The crystal structure of PAB0955 from Pyrococcus abyssi shows that, unlike other SIMIBI class G proteins, these highly conserved GTPases are homodimeric, regardless of the presence of nucleotides. The nucleotide‐binding site of PAB0955 is rather rigid and its conformation is closest to that of the activated SRP G domain. One insertion to the G domain bears a strictly conserved GPN motif, which is part of the catalytic site of the other monomer and stabilizes the phosphate ion formed. Owing to this unique functional feature, we propose to call this family as GPN‐loop GTPase.

[1]  K. Tanaka,et al.  A novel cytoplasmic GTPase XAB1 interacts with DNA repair protein XPA. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  I. Vetter,et al.  The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding Switch in Three Dimensions , 2001, Science.

[3]  C. Bruni,et al.  MBDin, a Novel MBD2-Interacting Protein, Relieves MBD2 Repression Potential and Reactivates Transcription from Methylated Promoters , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[4]  R. Stroud,et al.  Structure of the conserved GTPase domain of the signal recognition particle , 1997, Nature.

[5]  S. Kim,et al.  X-ray crystal structures of transforming p21 ras mutants suggest a transition-state stabilization mechanism for GTP hydrolysis. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Frank McCormick,et al.  The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism , 1991, Nature.

[7]  Detlef D. Leipe,et al.  Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J. Navaza,et al.  AMoRe: an automated package for molecular replacement , 1994 .

[9]  W. Kabsch,et al.  The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. , 1997, Science.

[10]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[11]  A. Wittinghofer,et al.  Structural Insights into HypB, a GTP-binding Protein That Regulates Metal Binding* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  M. Shirakawa,et al.  Crystal Structure of Human RhoA in a Dominantly Active Form Complexed with a GTP Analogue* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  S. Gras,et al.  Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the PAB0955 gene product. , 2005, Acta Crystallographica. Section F : Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications.

[14]  M. Inouye,et al.  Characterization of the autophosphorylation of Era, an essential Escherichia coli GTPase , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[15]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[16]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[17]  R. Stroud,et al.  Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor , 2004, Nature.