Rare disease diagnosis: A review of web search, social media and large-scale data-mining approaches

Physicians and the general public are increasingly using web-based tools to find answers to medical questions. The field of rare diseases is especially challenging and important as shown by the long delay and many mistakes associated with diagnoses. In this paper we review recent initiatives on the use of web search, social media and data mining in data repositories for medical diagnosis. We compare the retrieval accuracy on 56 rare disease cases with known diagnosis for the web search tools google.com, pubmed.gov, omim.org and our own search tool findzebra.com. We give a detailed description of IBM's Watson system and make a rough comparison between findzebra.com and Watson on subsets of the Doctor's dilemma dataset. The recall@10 and recall@20 (fraction of cases where the correct result appears in top 10 and top 20) for the 56 cases are found to be be 29%, 16%, 27% and 59% and 32%, 18%, 34% and 64%, respectively. Thus, FindZebra has a significantly (p < 0.01) higher recall than the other 3 search engines. When tested under the same conditions, Watson and FindZebra showed similar recall@10 accuracy. However, the tests were performed on different subsets of Doctors dilemma questions. Advances in technology and access to high quality data have opened new possibilities for aiding the diagnostic process. Specialized search engines, data mining tools and social media are some of the areas that hold promise.

[1]  David Parkin,et al.  Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  W. R. Smith,et al.  Evidence for the effectiveness of techniques To change physician behavior. , 2000, Chest.

[3]  B. Delaney,et al.  Potential for improving patient safety by computerized decision support systems. , 2008, Family practice.

[4]  Randolph A. Miller,et al.  Review: Medical Diagnostic Decision Support Systems - Past, Present, And Future: A Threaded Bibliography and Brief Commentary , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Ole Winther,et al.  FindZebra: A search engine for rare diseases , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  E. Berner,et al.  Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. , 2008, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  Eta S. Berner,et al.  Clinician Performance and Prominence of Diagnoses Displayed by a Clinical Diagnostic Decision Support System , 2003, AMIA.

[8]  Marcel H. Schulz,et al.  Clinical diagnostics in human genetics with semantic similarity searches in ontologies. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  Mark Lee,et al.  Internal medicine resident satisfaction with a diagnostic decision support system (DXplain) introduced on a teaching hospital service , 2002, AMIA.

[10]  Hangwi Tang,et al.  Googling for a diagnosis—use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  Rule Based Expert Systems: The Mycin Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (The Addison-Wesley series in artificial intelligence) , 1984 .

[12]  Marc-Allen Cartright,et al.  Intentions and attention in exploratory health search , 2011, SIGIR.

[13]  A. Sood,et al.  Literature search using PubMed: an essential tool for practicing evidence- based medicine. , 2006, The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India.

[14]  Peter J. Haug,et al.  ILIAD as an Expert Consultant to Teach Differential Diagnosis , 1988 .

[15]  Maria Esperanza Ruiz,et al.  Risks of self-medication practices. , 2010, Current drug safety.

[16]  Michael D. Reis,et al.  Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[17]  Ole Winther,et al.  Specialized tools are needed when searching the web for rare disease diagnoses , 2013, Rare diseases.

[18]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Identifying barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders: Bootstrapping multiple methods , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[19]  J. D. Myers,et al.  The background of INTERNIST I and QMR , 1987, HMI '87.

[20]  D. Classen,et al.  Clinical decision support systems to improve clinical practice and quality of care. , 1998, JAMA.

[21]  Erik T. Mueller,et al.  Watson: Beyond Jeopardy! , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Jennifer Chu-Carroll,et al.  Building Watson: An Overview of the DeepQA Project , 2010, AI Mag..

[23]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Experiences with Web Search on Medical Concerns and Self Diagnosis , 2009, AMIA.

[24]  H. Lehmann,et al.  Clinical Decision Support Systems (cdsss) Have Been Hailed for Their Potential to Reduce Medical Errors Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine , 2022 .

[25]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  N. Franklin,et al.  Diagnostic error in internal medicine. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[27]  Nancy Franklin,et al.  Reducing Diagnostic Errors in Medicine: What's the Goal? , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[28]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Clinical Reminders: Why Don't they use them? , 2004 .

[29]  Damian Smedley,et al.  The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  Padmanabhan Ramnarayan,et al.  A novel diagnostic aid (ISABEL): development and preliminary evaluation of clinical performance , 2004, MedInfo.