Web-application development projects by online communities: Which practices favour innovation?

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose an in-depth analysis of online communities of practice that support the innovative development of web applications. The analysis is aimed at understanding the preeminent characteristics of communities of practice that can favour the process of innovation (conceptualisation and realization of a web application) and if these characteristics differ in the diverse phases of a software development project (requirement specification, design, implementation and verification). Design/methodology/approach The authors adopted a multiple case study research design, selected 29 communities of practice related to the development of web applications and classified them recognizing the different practices that refer to the different phases of the innovation process of web-applications software development. Finally, the authors focussed on seven communities comparing five important dimensions for each one. Findings The results of the empirical analysis show that the best practices are different, considering the different phases of the project, and that these practices can be strategies directed at members to attract them and also, strategies directed at the community to permit collaboration. Originality/value The paper proposes an important and new insight into the management of virtual communities of practice (VCoP). The authors supposed that the ways to manage a VCoP could depend on project phases. In particular, the management practices of community should differ according to the different project phases, i.e. requirements specification, design, implementation and verification of the software. Literature in this sense presented only research focussed on the different effects of virtualness on teams depending on the length of team duration and on communication efforts.

[1]  LeMai Nguyen,et al.  Power relations in virtual communities: An ethnographic study , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[2]  Jie Yu,et al.  Encouraging participation in virtual communities through usability and sociability development: an empirical investigation , 2011, DATB.

[3]  Alberto De Toni,et al.  Organizational design drivers to enable emergent creativity in web‐based communities , 2012 .

[4]  Bryan Reinicke,et al.  Learning through Interactions: Improving Project Management through Communities of Practice , 2015 .

[5]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  Open innovation web-based platforms: The impact of different forms of motivation on collaboration , 2012 .

[6]  Terrie Lynn Thompson,et al.  Self‐employed and online: (re)negotiating work‐learning practices , 2010 .

[7]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[8]  Gavin Baxter,et al.  Implementing Web 2.0 tools in organisations , 2014 .

[9]  Wen-Bin Yu,et al.  Enhancing business networks using social network based virtual communities , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[10]  Margaret L. Sheng,et al.  An exploratory study of knowledge creation and sharing in online community: a social capital perspective , 2015 .

[11]  Jim Suchan,et al.  The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study , 2001 .

[12]  R. Fahey,et al.  The impact of rewards within communities of practice: a study of the SAP online global community , 2007 .

[13]  Pablo Erat,et al.  Business customer communities and knowledge sharing: exploratory study of critical issues , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  What drives collective innovation? Exploring the system of drivers for motivations in open innovation Web-based platforms , 2012, Inf. Res..

[15]  Judith Molka-Danielsen,et al.  Sympathy or strategy: social capital drivers for collaborative contributions to the IS community , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Yamina Bouchamma,et al.  Professional development of supervisors through professional learning communities , 2014 .

[17]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Global organizational communities of practice: The effects of nationality diversity, psychological safety, and media richness on community performance , 2013 .

[18]  Beyza Oba,et al.  Organising the digital commons: a case study on engagement strategies in open source , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Zahari Taha,et al.  Virtual Teams: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[20]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[21]  Ray Ison,et al.  Insights into Operationalizing Communities of Practice from SSM-Based Inquiry Processes , 2014 .

[22]  Demosthenes Akoumianakis,et al.  Cross-Organization Virtual CoP: A Field Study in an Information-Based Industry , 2011 .

[23]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Communities of practice and organizational performance , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[24]  H. Mai,et al.  Consumer participation in virtual communities: The role of personal values and personality , 2015 .

[25]  A. Pettigrew The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research , 1992 .

[26]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[27]  Ian MacInnes,et al.  Property rights, legal issues, and business models in virtual world communities , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[28]  David M. McCutcheon,et al.  Conducting case study research in operations management , 1993 .

[29]  Aristidis Protopsaltis,et al.  E-commerce transactions in a virtual environment: virtual transactions , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res..

[30]  T.M.A. Bemelmans,et al.  Group Support Systems and Virtual Collaboration: The HKNET Project , 2002 .

[31]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[32]  Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara,et al.  Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[33]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  Andrew Cox,et al.  What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[35]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[36]  Mike Bresnen,et al.  Institutional development, divergence and change in the discipline of project management , 2016 .

[37]  Natasha F. Veltri,et al.  Virtual Communities as Narrative Networks: Developing a Model of Knowledge Creation for Crowdsourced Environments , 2013, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[39]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Ramakrishnan Raman,et al.  Enabling organizations to implement smarter, customized social computing platforms by leveraging knowledge flow patterns , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[41]  Debra M. Gilbuena,et al.  Feedback on Professional Skills as Enculturation into Communities of Practice , 2015 .

[42]  Stina Matthiesen,et al.  Does Distance Still Matter? Revisiting the CSCW Fundamentals on Distributed Collaboration , 2014, TCHI.

[43]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[44]  Tuomas Ahola,et al.  A network perspective on idea and innovation crowdsourcing in industrial firms , 2014 .

[45]  Thomas Köhler,et al.  Learning Management Systems as a Tool for Community-based Project Management , 2009, GeNeMe.

[46]  Karl-Erik Sveiby,et al.  Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work - an empirical study , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[47]  Timothy R. Kayworth,et al.  The global virtual manager: a prescription for success , 2000 .

[48]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development , 2000, DATB.

[49]  Stefaan van Ryssen,et al.  Going international without going international: multinational virtual teams , 2000 .

[50]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[51]  Johann Füller,et al.  Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[52]  Les Tien-Shang Lee,et al.  The effects of team reflexivity and innovativeness on new product development performance , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[53]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[54]  David Preece,et al.  Communities of practice, knowledge acquisition and innovation: a case study of science-based SMEs , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[55]  Line Dubé,et al.  The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice , 2005 .

[56]  Rajiv Khosla,et al.  Mapping knowledge sharing traits to business strategy in knowledge based organisation , 2014, J. Intell. Manuf..

[57]  Stefan Haefliger,et al.  The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation , 2013 .

[58]  A. Orders Cultivating communities of practice , 2013 .

[59]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Digital Habitats : Stewarding technology for communities , 2009 .

[60]  Tsung-Hsien Kuo,et al.  How system quality and incentive affect knowledge sharing , 2013, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[61]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  A mechanism for supporting collective innovation: the open contract-based challenge , 2013, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[62]  Laura A. Hambley,et al.  Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes , 2007 .

[63]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[64]  Abel Usoro,et al.  Trust as an Aspect of Organisational Culture: Its Effects on Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof..

[65]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Understanding the social web: towards defining an interdisciplinary research agenda for information systems , 2014, DATB.

[66]  Nicolas Perry,et al.  Factors of Success Analysis and Comparison , 2010, J. Decis. Syst..

[67]  Andrew W. H. Ip,et al.  Explore the feasibility of adopting crowdsourcing for innovative problem solving , 2015, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[68]  Michelle LaBrosse,et al.  Managing virtual teams , 2008 .

[69]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  Industrial Management & Data Systems Determinants of success in open source software networks , 2016 .

[70]  R. Yin Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[71]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[72]  Fabio Nonino,et al.  Exploring the impact of motivations on the attraction of innovation roles in open innovation web-based platforms , 2013 .

[73]  Stefano Borzillo,et al.  Unravelling the dynamics of knowledge creation in communities of practice though complexity theory lenses , 2011 .

[74]  Frank Siedlok,et al.  From practice to collaborative community in interdisciplinary research contexts , 2015 .

[75]  Tom L. Roberts,et al.  Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: the case of working professionals in France and the U.K. who use online communities , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[76]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Creation and recreation: motivating collaboration to generate knowledge capital in online communities , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[77]  Paula R. Kaiser,et al.  Student Team Projects by Internet , 2000 .

[78]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  The Operational Impact of Organizational Communities of Practice , 2015 .

[79]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects , 1993 .

[80]  N. Archer A comparison of computer conferences with face-to-face meetings for small group business decisions , 1990 .

[81]  Paul C. van Fenema,et al.  Cocreating Understanding and Value in Distributed Work: How Members of Onsite and Offshore Vendor Teams Give, Make, Demand, and Break Sense , 2008, MIS Q..

[82]  D. Adebanjo,et al.  Development processes in B2B virtual communities , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology (ICMIT).

[83]  C. Strauss,et al.  Erratum to: Social Crowd Integration in New Product Development: Crowdsourcing Communities Nourish the Open Innovation Paradigm , 2014 .

[84]  Amir Hossein Ghapanchi,et al.  Rallying competencies in virtual communities: A study of core processes and user interest in open source software projects , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[85]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[86]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams , 2000 .

[87]  M. Lind The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups , 1999 .

[88]  Trent J. Spaulding How can virtual communities create value for business? , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[89]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[90]  Efraim Turban,et al.  What can crowdsourcing do for decision support? , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[91]  Thomas Matheus,et al.  ‘Hybrid’ open source software virtual communities of practice – a conceptual framework , 2015, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..