Robust quantum gates for open systems via optimal control: Markovian versus non-Markovian dynamics

We study the implementation of one-, two- and three-qubit quantum gates for interacting qubits using optimal control. Markovian and non-Markovian environments are compared and efficient optimization algorithms utilizing analytic gradient expressions and quasi-Newton updates are given for both cases. The performance of the algorithms is analysed for a large set of problems in terms of the fidelities attained and the observed convergence behaviour. New notions of success rate and success speed are introduced and density plots are utilized to study the effects of key parameters, such as gate operation times, and random variables such as the initial fields required to start the iterative algorithm. Core characteristics of the optimal fields are analysed statistically. Substantial differences between Markovian and non-Markovian environments in terms of the possibilities for control and the control mechanisms are uncovered. In the non-Markovian case, gate fidelities improve substantially when the details of the system bath coupling are taken into account, although imperfections such as field leakage can be a significant problem. In the Markovian case, computation time is saved if the fields are pre-optimized neglecting the environment, while including the latter generally does not significantly improve gate fidelities.

[1]  Quantum Zeno-like effect due to competing decoherence mechanisms , 2001, quant-ph/0106137.

[2]  C. G. Broyden The Convergence of a Class of Double-rank Minimization Algorithms 1. General Considerations , 1970 .

[3]  H. Risken,et al.  Quantum Collapses and Revivals in a Quantized Trap , 1992 .

[4]  Correcting the effects of spontaneous emission on cold-trapped ions , 1996, quant-ph/9610031.

[5]  D. Dalvit,et al.  Decoherence in Bose-Einstein condensates: Towards bigger and better Schrödinger cats , 2000, cond-mat/0001301.

[6]  Hsi-Sheng Goan,et al.  Optimal control for non-Markovian open quantum systems , 2012, 1203.6128.

[7]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[8]  S. G. Schirmer,et al.  Implementation of fault-tolerant quantum logic gates via optimal control , 2009, 0907.1635.

[9]  S. Lloyd,et al.  DYNAMICAL SUPPRESSION OF DECOHERENCE IN TWO-STATE QUANTUM SYSTEMS , 1998, quant-ph/9803057.

[10]  Artur Ekert,et al.  Quantum computers and dissipation , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Encoding a qubit into multilevel subspaces , 2004, quant-ph/0412059.

[12]  S. Schirmer,et al.  Generating maximal entanglement between non-interacting atoms by collective decay and symmetry breaking , 2010, 1005.2114.

[13]  Constantin Brif,et al.  Optimal control of quantum gates and suppression of decoherence in a system of interacting two-level particles , 2007, quant-ph/0702147.

[14]  T. Monz,et al.  An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions , 2011, Nature.

[15]  F K Wilhelm,et al.  Optimal control of a qubit coupled to a non-Markovian environment. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[16]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Decoherence of molecular vibrational wave packets: Observable manifestations and control criteria , 2001 .

[17]  J. Ankerhold,et al.  Optimal control of open quantum systems: cooperative effects of driving and dissipation. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[18]  M. Thorwart,et al.  Phonon-induced decoherence and dissipation in donor-based charge qubits , 2006 .

[19]  M. Stutzmann,et al.  Spin echoes in the charge transport through phosphorus donors in silicon. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[20]  S. Schirmer,et al.  Efficient algorithms for optimal control of quantum dynamics: the Krotov method unencumbered , 2011, 1103.5435.

[21]  D. Deutsch Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  Rotationally induced collapse and revivals of molecular vibrational wavepackets: model for environment-induced decoherence , 2002 .

[23]  Constantin Brif,et al.  Fidelity of optimally controlled quantum gates with randomly coupled multiparticle environments , 2007, 0712.2935.

[24]  Gilles Nogues,et al.  Rabi oscillations revival induced by time reversal: a test of mesoscopic quantum coherence. , 2005 .

[25]  T. Mossberg,et al.  Studies of picosecond collisional dephasing in atomic sodium vapor using broad-bandwidth transient four-wave mixing , 1986 .

[26]  J. Kyriakidis,et al.  Transient dynamics of confined charges in quantum dots in the sequential tunneling regime , 2009, 0909.2992.

[27]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[28]  H. Sussmann,et al.  Control systems on Lie groups , 1972 .

[29]  J. Bell On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[30]  Bich Ha Nguyen Quantum dynamics of quantum bits , 2011 .

[31]  A. A. Budini,et al.  Non-Markovian master equations from entanglement with stationary unobserved degrees of freedom , 2004, quant-ph/0412020.

[32]  Martin B. Plenio,et al.  An introduction to entanglement measures , 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[33]  N. Khaneja,et al.  Optimal control for generating quantum gates in open dissipative systems , 2006, quant-ph/0609037.

[34]  W. Zurek The Environment, Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical , 1991 .

[35]  A. Gruslys,et al.  Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework , 2010, 1011.4874.

[36]  G. Lindblad On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , 1976 .

[37]  A. A. Budini Open quantum system approach to single-molecule spectroscopy , 2009, 0902.4019.

[38]  Constantin Brif,et al.  Environment-invariant measure of distance between evolutions of an open quantum system , 2009, 0909.0077.

[39]  S. Schirmer,et al.  Quantum control of two-qubit entanglement dissipation , 2011, 1109.1137.

[40]  Reversible and irreversible dynamics of a qubit interacting with a small environment , 2006, quant-ph/0611262.

[41]  S. Glaser,et al.  Second order gradient ascent pulse engineering. , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[42]  Xiaoting Wang,et al.  Contractivity of the Hilbert-Schmidt distance under open-system dynamics , 2009, 0901.4547.