Characterization of Acoustic Emission Sources in a Rock Salt Specimen under Triaxial Compression

This study presents the application of an automated moment tensor analysis procedure on microcracks, which were generated during a triaxial compression test of a cylindrical rock salt specimen (diameter 150 mm, length 300 mm). The acoustic emission signals were detected in a frequency range between 20 kHz and 1 MHz using 12 acoustic emission sensors mounted on the surface of the specimen cylinder. The moment tensor analysis was applied to about 30,000 events, which were precisely located using at least 16 P - and S -wave arrival times. For more than 40% of these events, approximately 12,500 events, stable moment tensor solutions could be evaluated using the first motion of the P -wave radiation patterns. Most of the evaluated events showed significant isotropic source components, which is in good agreement with dilatation of the rock during compressional loading. The majority of the events were caused by tensile opening leading to dilatation of the rock. The tension ( T ) axes, which are normal to the crack plane of these tensile microcracks, were predominantly oriented radially in the cylindrical specimen, perpendicular to the maximum principal stress, which is oriented axially. The direction of the tensile opening calculated by the moment tensor evaluation coincides very well with the direction of the minimum principal stress. The applied collapsing method discovers cellular structures with a cell size in the range of a few centimetres. However, it seems that the events occur only in zones where the cell interfaces are favourably orientated in the stress field. These events are attributed to cracking at grain interfaces which occurs in rock salt under very slow creep loading above the dilatancy boundary.

[1]  L. Linzer A Relative Moment Tensor Inversion Technique Applied to Seismicity Induced by Mining , 2005 .

[2]  John A. Hudson,et al.  Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor , 1989 .

[3]  Torsten Dahm,et al.  Moment tensor evaluation of acoustic emission sources in salt rock , 2001 .

[4]  H. Niitsuma,et al.  Analysis of acoustic emission from hydraulically induced tensile fracture of rock , 1993 .

[5]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  Quantitative evaluation and visualization of cracking process in reinforced concrete by a moment tensor analysis of acoustic emission , 1995 .

[6]  D. Lockner,et al.  Hydrofracture in Weber Sandstone at high confining pressure and differential stress , 1977 .

[7]  John H. Woodhouse,et al.  CENTROID-MOMENT TENSOR SOLUTIONS FOR 201 MODERATE AND LARGE EARTHQUAKES OF 1981 , 1983 .

[8]  Shigenori Yuyama,et al.  Acoustic Emission - Beyond the Millennium , 2000 .

[9]  K.-H. Lux,et al.  Erhöhung der Wirtschaftlichkeit von Speicherkavernen durch Anwendung eines neuen Entwurfs- und Nachweiskonzeptes (II) , 2002 .

[10]  Udo Hunsche,et al.  Rock salt — the mechanical properties of the host rock material for a radioactive waste repository , 1999 .

[11]  G. Müller Volume Change of Seismic Sources from Moment Tensors , 2001 .

[12]  C. Scholz,et al.  Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline rocks , 1966 .

[13]  A. D. Miller,et al.  Non‐double‐couple earthquakes 2. Observations , 1998 .

[14]  C. Scholz The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes , 1968 .

[15]  Torsten Dahm,et al.  Relative moment tensors of thermally induced microcracks in salt rock , 1998 .

[16]  Peter Bormann,et al.  IASPEI New Manual of seismological observatory practice(NMSOP) , 2002 .

[17]  G. Herget Stresses in rock , 1987 .

[18]  Wolfgang Sachse,et al.  Study of brittle fracture by acoustic emission from indentation cracks , 1989 .

[19]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  A Student’s Guide to and Review of Moment Tensors , 1989 .

[20]  Gerhard Müller,et al.  Seismic moment and long-period radiation of underground nuclear explosions , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[21]  C. Sondergeld,et al.  Source mechanisms and microfracturing during uniaxial cycling of rock , 1982 .

[22]  S. Stanchits,et al.  Source analysis of acoustic emissions in Aue granite cores under symmetric and asymmetric compressive loads , 1998 .

[23]  Christian U. Grosse,et al.  Localization and classification of fracture types in concrete with quantitative acoustic emission measurement techniques , 1997 .

[24]  M. J. Randall,et al.  The compensated linear‐vector dipole: A possible mechanism for deep earthquakes , 1970 .

[25]  Wolfgang Sachse,et al.  Miniaturized capacitive transducer for detection of broadband ultrasonic displacement signals , 1989 .

[26]  R. H. Jones,et al.  A method for determining significant structures in a cloud of earthquakes , 1997 .

[27]  G. Manthei,et al.  AUTOMATED MOMENT TENSOR INVERSION TO ESTIMATE SOURCE MECHANISMS OF HYDRAULICALLY INDUCED MICRO-SEISMICITY IN SALT ROCK , 1999 .

[28]  John A. Hudson,et al.  Defining the scalar moment of a seismic source with a general moment tensor , 1999 .

[29]  T. Dahm,et al.  Relative moment tensor inversion based on ray theory: theory and synthetic tests , 1996 .

[30]  C. Scruby,et al.  Dynamic elastic displacements at the surface of an elastic half-space due to defect sources , 1983 .

[31]  F. Gilbert Excitation of the Normal Modes of the Earth by Earthquake Sources , 1971 .

[32]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[33]  C. Frohlich,et al.  An efficient method for joint hypocenter determination for large groups of earthquakes , 1979 .

[34]  R. Paul Young,et al.  Moment tensor inversion of induced microseisnmic events: Evidence of non-shear failures in the -4 < M < -2 moment magnitude range , 1992 .

[35]  Ming Cai,et al.  A Tensile Model for the Interpretation of Microseismic Events near Underground Openings , 1998 .

[36]  C. B. Scruby,et al.  Characterisation of fatigue crack extension by quantitative acoustic emission , 1985, International Journal of Fracture.

[37]  Christopher H. Scholz,et al.  Microfracturing and the inelastic deformation of rock in compression , 1968 .

[38]  Bruce R. Julian,et al.  Three-dimensional seismic structure and moment tensors of non-double-couple earthquakes at the Hengill–Grensdalur volcanic complex, Iceland , 1998 .

[39]  Joseph F Labuz,et al.  Damage mechanisms in stressed rock from acoustic emission , 1995 .

[40]  T. Tamura Focal mechanisms of acoustic emissions in Abukuma-granite under uniaxial and biaxial compressions , 1980 .

[41]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Surface Motions of a Thick Plate , 1958 .

[42]  Christian U. Grosse,et al.  Improvements of AE technique using wavelet algorithms, coherence functions and automatic data analysis , 2003 .

[43]  C. Frohlich Earthquakes with Non—Double-Couple Mechanisms , 1994, Science.

[44]  C. B. Scruby,et al.  Quantitative acoustic emission source characterisation during low temperature cleavage and intergranular fracture , 1981 .

[45]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  A Student’s Guide to Point Sources in Homogeneous Media , 1990 .

[46]  T. Jordan,et al.  Optimal estimation of scalar seismic moment , 1982 .

[47]  John R. Rice,et al.  Elastic wave emission from damage processes , 1980 .

[48]  A. DOUGLAS,et al.  Joint Epicentre Determination , 1967, Nature.

[49]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  GENERALIZED THEORY AND SOURCE REPRESENTATIONS OF ACOUSTIC EMISSION. , 1985 .