A profit-based unit commitment GA for the competitive environment

As the electrical industry restructures, many of the traditional algorithms for controlling generating units need modification or replacement, previously utilized to schedule generation units in a manner that minimizes costs while meeting all demand, the unit commitment (UC) algorithm must be updated. A UC algorithm that maximizes profit will play an essential role in developing successful bidding strategies for the competitive generator. Simply bidding to win contracts is insufficient; bidding strategies must result in contracts that, on average, cover the total generation costs. No longer guaranteed to be the only electricity supplier, a generation company's share of the demand will be more difficult to predict than in the past. Removing the obligation to serve softens the demand constraint. In this paper the authors provide a price/profit-based UC formulation which considers the softer demand constraint and allocates fixed and transitional costs to the scheduled hours. The authors describe a genetic algorithm solution to this new UC problem and present results for an illustrative example.

[1]  Gerald B. Sheblé,et al.  Unit commitment for operations , 1985 .

[2]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning , 1989 .

[3]  Gerald L. Thompson,et al.  Computational economics : economic modeling with optimization software , 1992 .

[4]  G. Sheblé,et al.  Framework for energy brokerage system with reserve margin and transmission losses , 1996 .

[5]  G. Sheblé,et al.  Genetic algorithm evolution of utility bidding strategies for the competitive marketplace , 1998 .

[6]  G. Sheblé,et al.  Auction game in electric power market place , 1996 .

[7]  Samer Takriti,et al.  Incorporating Fuel Constraints and Electricity Spot Prices into the Stochastic Unit Commitment Problem , 2000, Oper. Res..

[8]  H. Happ,et al.  Transmission access issues , 1996 .

[9]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Auctions and Bidding: A Primer , 1989 .

[10]  B. Barkovich,et al.  Charting a new course in California [electricity market restructuring] , 1996 .

[11]  G. Sheblé Priced based operation in an auction market structure , 1996 .

[12]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[13]  Gerald B. Sheblé,et al.  Unit commitment literature synopsis , 1994 .

[14]  M. Andrews,et al.  Genetic programming for the acquisition of double auction market strategies , 1994 .

[15]  Gerald B. Sheblé,et al.  Genetic-based unit commitment algorithm , 1996 .

[16]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .

[17]  Philip G. Hill,et al.  Power generation , 1927, Journal of the A.I.E.E..