Effectiveness of Global Treatment Budgets for Patients With Mental Disorders—Claims Data Based Meta-Analysis of 13 Controlled Studies From Germany

Background: Individuals with mental disorders need continuous and efficient collaboration between different sectors of care. In 2012, a new law in Germany enabled the implementation of novel budgets in psychiatry (flexible and integrated treatment = FIT). Hospitals implementing FIT programs have been evaluated in controlled cohort studies. We present first results based on a meta-analysis from 13 FIT hospitals. Methods/Design: We undertook a series of claims-data-based controlled cohort studies. Data from over 70 statutory health insurance (SHI) funds in Germany were analyzed. All patients insured by any of the participating SHI funds and treated in one of the FIT hospitals for any of 16 predefined mental disorders were compared with matched control patients from routine care. The patient collective was subdivided into hospital-new and hospital-known patients. Analyses included utilization of inpatient care, day care, outpatient PIA (psychiatrische Institutsambulanz) care, outpatient care with established practitioners, and durations of sick leave. Individual treatment effects of the 13 FIT hospitals were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis was used to explore potential reasons for heterogeneity in model effectiveness. Results: The meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction by over 5 days of inpatient care in hospital-new patients in FIT hospitals compared to control hospitals. This effect was stronger among FIT hospitals with a preexisting FIT-like environment. There was no overall significant effect regarding sick leave between the two groups. Further meta-regression for hospital-new patients revealed a significantly reduced duration of sick leave by almost 13 days for patients in FIT hospitals with a preexisting FIT-like contract compared to FIT hospitals without such a contract. Conclusions: This study suggests positive effects of FIT programs for patients with mental disorders pointing toward a shorter duration of inpatient treatment. Furthermore, contracts already existent prior to initialization of FIT programs appear to have facilitated the transition into the new treatment environment. For FIT hospitals without such contracts, supposedly there is a certain implementation phase for effects to be apparent. The results should still be interpreted with caution as this manuscript only covers the first year of the 5 year evaluation period in 13 of 18 FIT hospitals. Clinical Trial Registration: This study was registered in the database “Health Services Research Germany” (trial number: VVfD_EVA64_15_003713).

[1]  E. Swart,et al.  [Methodological Challenges when Using Claims Data of more than 70 Statutory Health Insurances - A Progress Report from the EVA64 Study]. , 2020, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[2]  A. Pfennig,et al.  Methodische Herausforderungen bei der Nutzung von Daten von mehr als 70 gesetzlichen Krankenkassen – Ein Werkstattbericht aus der EVA64-Studie , 2020 .

[3]  Irene Schmidtmann,et al.  Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology , 2019, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[4]  A. Bechdolf,et al.  Evaluation of Flexible and Integrative Psychiatric Treatment Models in Germany—A Mixed-Method Patient and Staff-Oriented Exploratory Study , 2019, Front. Psychiatry.

[5]  Julian Schwarz,et al.  Evaluation of new flexible and integrative psychiatric treatment models in Germany- assessment and preliminary validation of specific program components , 2018, BMC Psychiatry.

[6]  M. Chalkley,et al.  Funding approaches for mental health services: is there still a role for clustering? , 2018, BJPsych Advances.

[7]  E. Swart,et al.  The influence of cross-sectoral treatment models on patients with mental disorders in Germany: study protocol of a nationwide long-term evaluation study (EVA64) , 2018, BMC Psychiatry.

[8]  Lesley Manson,et al.  Financing the Primary Care Behavioral Health Model , 2018, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

[9]  Felix Fischer,et al.  Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Integrated Care in a Regional Psychiatry Budget – A Pre-Post Comparison by Secondary Data Analysis , 2016, International journal of integrated care.

[10]  A. Pfennig,et al.  Auswahl geeigneter Kontrollkliniken für die Durchführung der bundesweiten und einheitlichen Evaluation von Modellvorhaben nach § 64b SGB V. Analyse von Daten der Strukturierten Qualitätsberichte , 2016 .

[11]  E. Swart,et al.  A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen). , 2016, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[12]  H. Pfaff,et al.  [Prioritization and Consentation of Criteria for the Appraisal, Funding and Evaluation of Projects from the German Innovationsfonds: A multi-perspective Delphi study]. , 2015, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[13]  E. Swart,et al.  Gute Praxis Sekundärdatenanalyse (GPS): Leitlinien und Empfehlungen , 2015 .

[14]  A. Pfennig,et al.  Die psychische Gesundheit von Kindern, Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen – Teil 1: Häufigkeit, Störungspersistenz, Belastungsfaktoren, Service-Inanspruchnahme und Behandlungsverzögerung mit Konsequenzen , 2013 .

[15]  A. Pfennig,et al.  Die psychische Gesundheit von Kindern, Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen – Teil 2: Krankheitslast, Defizite des deutschen Versorgungssystems, Effektivität und Effizienz von „Early Intervention Services“ , 2013 .

[16]  C. Brettschneider,et al.  Wie wirkt das Regionale Psychiatriebudget (RPB) in einer Region mit initial niedriger Bettenmessziffer? , 2013, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[17]  T. Steinert,et al.  Systematische Literaturübersicht zur Implementierung der sektorübergreifenden Versorgung (Regionalbudget, integrierte Versorgung) in Deutschland , 2013, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[18]  P. Falkai,et al.  The diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder: recommendations from the current s3 guideline. , 2013, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[19]  A. Pfennig,et al.  [Psychiatric care for subjects with bipolar disorder: results of the new German S3 guidelines]. , 2012, Der Nervenarzt.

[20]  A. Pfennig,et al.  Versorgung von Menschen mit bipolar affektiven Störungen in Deutschland , 2012, Der Nervenarzt.

[21]  A. Deister,et al.  Modelle für eine zukunftsfähige psychiatrische Versorgung , 2012, Die Psychiatrie.

[22]  T. Hu,et al.  Capitation of public mental health services in Colorado: a five-year follow-up of system-level effects. , 2011, Psychiatric services.

[23]  K. Sander,et al.  Innovative Projekte im Gefolge der Gesundheitsmodernisierungs- gesetze: Erfahrungen mit einem Projekt der integrierten Versorgung in der Psychiatrie , 2010 .

[24]  A. Deister,et al.  Veränderung der psychiatrischen Versorgung durch ein Regionales Budget , 2010 .

[25]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package , 2010 .

[26]  F. Gerlach,et al.  Garbage in Garbage out? Validitt von Abrechnungsdiagnosen in hausrztlichen Praxen , 2009 .

[27]  M. Angermeyer,et al.  [The regional psychiatry budget: costs and effects of a new multisector financing model for psychiatric care]. , 2008, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[28]  C. Estes,et al.  A preliminary assessment of the impact of block grants on community mental health centers. , 2006, Hospital & community psychiatry.

[29]  H. König,et al.  Das Regionale Psychiatriebudget: Ein neuer Ansatz zur effizienten Verknüpfung stationärer und ambulanter Versorgungsleistungen , 2005 .

[30]  Linda M. Cabral,et al.  Overview Of Publicly Funded Managed Behavioral Health Care , 2005, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[31]  U. Frick,et al.  [Financing methods for psychiatric care: concepts, evidence and requirements]. , 2004, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[32]  Sharfstein Ss.  Medicaid cutbacks and block grants: crisis or opportunity for community mental health? , 1982 .

[33]  E. Swart.  Claims Data for Evaluation , 2021, Handbook Integrated Care.

[34]  E. Swart,et al.  [Identification of Control Hospitals for the Implementation of the Nationwide and Standardized Evaluation of Model Projects According to § 64b SGB V: Analysis of Data from Structured Quality Reports]. , 2019, Das Gesundheitswesen.

[35]  E. Swart,et al.  [Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations]. , 2015, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[36]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[37]  G. Juckel,et al.  [Mental health of children, adolescents and young adults--part 1: prevalence, illness persistence, adversities, service use, treatment delay and consequences]. , 2013, Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie.

[38]  S. Riedel-Heller,et al.  [How does the Regional Psychiatry Budget (RPB) work in an area with initially low capacity of psychiatric hospital beds?]. , 2013, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[39]  G. Juckel,et al.  [Mental health of children, adolescents and young adults--part 2: burden of illness, deficits of the German health care system and efficacy and effectiveness of early intervention services]. , 2013, Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie.

[40]  A. Deister.  [Changes in mental health care by a regional budget--results of a pilot project in schleswig-holstein (Germany)]. , 2011, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[41]  M. Angermeyer,et al.  [The regional psychiatry budget (RPB): a model for a new payment system of hospital based mental health care services]. , 2010, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[42]  A. Deister,et al.  [Changes in mental health care by a regional budget: results of a pilot Project in Schleswig-Holstein (Germany)]. , 2010, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[43]  M. Beyer,et al.  [Garbage in - garbage out? Validity of coded diagnoses from GP claims records]. , 2009, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).

[44]  M. Angermeyer,et al.  [The regional budget for mental health care: a new approach to combine inpatient and outpatient care]. , 2005, Psychiatrische Praxis.

[45]  G. Melton,et al.  Block Grants and Rural Mental Health Services. , 1987 .

[46]  S. Sharfstein.  Medicaid cutbacks and block grants: crisis or opportunity for community mental health? , 1982, The American journal of psychiatry.