Three-mode principal component analysis of confusion matrices, based on the identification of Dutch consonants, under various conditions of noise and reverberation

Abstract Dutch consonants, spoken in lists of two-syllable nonsense words of the type CVCVC which were embedded in short carrier phrases, were identified by listeners under various acoustic disturbance conditions. The 28 conditions were a mixture of four reverberation times, five signal-to-noise rations, and five different noise spectra. The identification results were summated over the six talkers and five listeners. In this way we achieved 28 confusion matrices per constant position (initial, medial, and final). These sets of matrices were processed by individual differences multidimensional scaling programs, and more specifically by TUCKALS (Kroonenberg and de Leeuw, [9]). The resulting three-dimensional stimulus configuration for the initial consonants is very stable and can be represented as a tetrahedron with /z, s/, /m, n/, /p, t, k, b, d/, and /f, v, χ/ at the four corner points and /l, r, w, j, h/ in the centre. This consonant configuration is discussed with respect to its relevance to the Dutch language given the experimental conditions. The representation of the 28 conditions turns out to be almost exclusively one-dimensional despite the three different aspects (reverberation time, noise level, noise spectrum) of the acoustic disturbances.

[1]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[2]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[3]  J. Kruskal Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[4]  K. Wilson Multidimensional analyses of confusions of English consonants. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[6]  P. Kroonenberg,et al.  Group And Individual Implicit Theories Of Personality: An Application Of Three-Mode Principal Component Analysis. , 1982, Multivariate behavioral research.

[7]  L. Hubert Some extensions of Johnson's hierarchical clustering algorithms , 1972 .

[8]  R. Shepard Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects , 1974 .

[9]  J. Lackner,et al.  The Psychological Representation of Speech Sounds , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  S S Agrawal,et al.  Significant features in the perception of (Hindi) consonants. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P T Smith,et al.  Feature-Testing Models and Their Application to Perception and Memory for Speech , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[13]  P. Arabie,et al.  Auditory versus phonetic accounts of observed confusions between consonant phonemes. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-model factor analysis , 1970 .

[15]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms , 1980 .

[16]  S. Singh,et al.  Study of twenty-six intervocalic consonants as spoken and recognized by four language groups. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function, I. General room acoustics , 1980 .

[18]  C M Reed,et al.  A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  L. Tucker Relations between multidimensional scaling and three-mode factor analysis , 1972 .

[20]  S. C. Johnson Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[21]  L. Tucker,et al.  Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis , 1966, Psychometrika.

[22]  M. D. Wang,et al.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Consonant intelligibility in reverberant and/or ambient noise conditions , 1981 .

[24]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features , 1977 .