Measuring diffusion and binding kinetics by contact area FRAP.

The immunological synapse is a stable intercellular structure that specializes in substance and signal transfer from one immune cell to another. Its formation is regulated in part by the diffusion of adhesion and signaling molecules into, and their binding of countermolecules in the contact area. The stability of immunological synapses allows receptor-ligand interactions to approximate chemical equilibrium despite other dynamic aspects. We have developed a mathematical model that describes the coupled reaction-diffusion process in an established immunological synapse. In this study, we extend a previously described contact area fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiment to test the validity of the model. The receptor binding activity and lateral mobility of fluorescently labeled, lipid-anchored ligands in the bilayer resulted in their accumulation, as revealed by a much higher fluorescence intensity inside the contact area than outside. After complete photobleaching of the synapse, fluorescence recovery requires ligands to dissociate and rebind, and to diffuse in and out of the contact area. Such a FRAP time course consequently provides information on reaction and diffusion, which can be extracted by fitting the model solution to the data. Surprisingly, reverse rates in the two-dimensional contact area were at least 100-fold slower than in three-dimensional solution. As previously reported in immunological synapses, a significant nonrecoverable fraction of fluorescence was observed with one of two systems studied, suggesting some ligands either dissociated or diffused much more slowly compared with other ligands in the same synapse. The combined theory and experiment thus provides a new method for in situ measurements of kinetic rates, diffusion coefficients, and nonrecoverable fractions of interacting molecules in immunological synapses and other stable cell-bilayer junctions.

[1]  P. Selvaraj,et al.  The Membrane Anchor Influences Ligand Binding Two-dimensional Kinetic Rates and Three-dimensional Affinity of FcγRIII (CD16)* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Adhesive Bond Dynamics in Contacts between T Lymphocytes and Glass-supported Planar Bilayers Reconstituted with the Immunoglobulin-related Adhesion Molecule CD58* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Low Affinity Interaction of Human or Rat T Cell Adhesion Molecule CD2 with Its Ligand Aligns Adhering Membranes to Achieve High Physiological Affinity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  P Bongrand,et al.  Determination of the lifetime and force dependence of interactions of single bonds between surface-attached CD2 and CD48 adhesion molecules. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  S. Bromley,et al.  Identification of self through two-dimensional chemistry and synapses. , 2001, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[6]  S. Dzik,et al.  The immunological synapse: A molecular machine controlling T cell activation , 2000 .

[7]  D. Mason,et al.  Human cell-adhesion molecule CD2 binds CD58 (LFA-3) with a very low affinity and an extremely fast dissociation rate but does not bind CD48 or CD59. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[8]  C. Zhu,et al.  Concurrent binding to multiple ligands: kinetic rates of CD16b for membrane-bound IgG1 and IgG2. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[9]  J. Galon,et al.  Affinity of the interaction between Fc gamma receptor type III (Fc gammaRIII) and monomeric human IgG subclasses. Role of Fc gammaRIII glycosylation. , 1997, European journal of immunology.

[10]  David I. Stuart,et al.  The Human Low Affinity Fcγ Receptors IIa, IIb, and III Bind IgG with Fast Kinetics and Distinct Thermodynamic Properties* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  P. Selvaraj,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Membrane Microtopology on Effective Two-dimensional Affinity* 210 , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  C. S. Izzard,et al.  Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. , 1976, Journal of cell science.

[13]  Andrea C. Pfeifer,et al.  Dissection of COPI and Arf1 dynamics in vivo and role in Golgi membrane transport , 2002, Nature.

[14]  R. Weis,et al.  Supported planar membranes in studies of cell-cell recognition in the immune system. , 1986, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[15]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Analysis of two-dimensional dissociation constant of laterally mobile cell adhesion molecules. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Patricia L. Widder,et al.  A Novel Adaptor Protein Orchestrates Receptor Patterning and Cytoskeletal Polarity in T-Cell Contacts , 1998, Cell.

[17]  C. Zhu,et al.  Concurrent and independent binding of Fcgamma receptors IIa and IIIb to surface-bound IgG. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Serologic cross-reactivity of T11 target structure and lymphocyte function-associated antigen 3. Evidence for structural homology of the sheep and human ligands of CD2. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[19]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Cytotoxic T lymphocytes form an antigen-independent ring junction. , 2004, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[20]  Colin R. F. Monks,et al.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.

[21]  G Poste,et al.  Measurement of the lateral mobility of cell surface components in single, living cells by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 1976, Journal of supramolecular structure.

[22]  Elaine Fuchs,et al.  Directed Actin Polymerization Is the Driving Force for Epithelial Cell–Cell Adhesion , 2000, Cell.

[23]  R. Icenogle,et al.  Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and photobleaching recovery of multiple binding reactions. II. FPR and FCS measurements at low and high DNA concentrations , 1983, Biopolymers.

[24]  P. Anderson,et al.  Ligand binding and phagocytosis by CD16 (Fc gamma receptor III) isoforms. Phagocytic signaling by associated zeta and gamma subunits in Chinese hamster ovary cells. , 1995, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  T. Springer,et al.  Natural killer cell and granulocyte Fc gamma receptor III (CD16) differ in membrane anchor and signal transduction. , 1989, Journal of immunology.

[26]  J. Galon,et al.  Affinity of the interaction between Fcgamma receptor type III (FcγRIII) and monomeric human IgG subclasses. Role of FcγRIII glycosylation , 1997 .

[27]  W. Webb,et al.  Measurement of lateral transport on cell surfaces. , 1976, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[28]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Molecular Orientation and Length on Two-dimensional Receptor-Ligand Binding Kinetics* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Visualization of CD2 interaction with LFA-3 and determination of the two-dimensional dissociation constant for adhesion receptors in a contact area , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  A coupled diffusion-kinetics model for analysis of contact-area FRAP experiment. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[31]  H. Qian,et al.  Interpretation of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and photobleaching recovery in terms of molecular interactions. , 1989, Methods in cell biology.

[32]  T. Springer,et al.  NATWRAL KILLER CELL AND GRANULOCYTE Fcr DIFFER IN MEMBRANE ANCHOR AND SIGNAL RECEPTOR I11 (CD16) TRANSDUCTION , 1989 .

[33]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Neural and Immunological Synaptic Relations , 2002, Science.

[34]  T. Meyer,et al.  Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)-tagged Cysteine-rich Domains from Protein Kinase C as Fluorescent Indicators for Diacylglycerol Signaling in Living Cells , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[35]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[36]  M. Poo,et al.  Contact-induced redistribution of specific membrane components: local accumulation and development of adhesion , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  C. Zhu,et al.  Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[38]  C. Zhu,et al.  Analysis of competition binding between soluble and membrane-bound ligands for cell surface receptors. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Ligand-specific oligomerization of T-cell receptor molecules , 1997, Nature.

[40]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Mechanisms of Cellular Avidity Regulation in CD2-CD58-Mediated T Cell Adhesion. , 2006, ACS chemical biology.