Hydrodynamic pressures on arch dam faces with irregular reservoir geometry

A scaled boundary finite element method is developed for the analysis of hydrodynamic pressures acting on arch dam faces with a reservoir of irregular geometry. Water compressibility and reservoir boundary absorption are considered simultaneously. The reservoir is idealized as composed of finite and infinite subdomains. Governing equations for evaluating hydrodynamic pressures of finite fluid domain have been established and the solution procedures are presented. In addition, the boundary conditions at the interface between finite and infinite subdomains are decided. Numerical examples validate the present method with high accuracy and show that the fairly irregular geometry of a reservoir has an important influence on the hydrodynamic pressures acting on the arch dam face. Frequency response functions of the hydrodynamic pressures in the stream and cross-stream directions are evidently influenced by reservoir geometry, while hydrodynamic pressures in the vertical direction are relatively less influenced. Another feature of the frequency response function of hydrodynamic pressures is that the amplitude of resonant peaks is affected much more by reservoir geometry as compared to the resonant frequency. Besides, peak value of hydrodynamic pressures in the arch direction and cantilever direction is also significantly influenced by reservoir geometry. Based on these facts, it can be concluded that the effect of reservoir geometry on hydrodynamic pressure should be considered for seismic design of arch dams.

[1]  H. Westergaard Water Pressures on Dams During Earthquakes , 1933 .

[2]  A. Chopra Hydrodynamic Pressures on Dams During Earthquakes , 1967 .

[3]  A. Chwang Hydrodynamic pressures on sloping dams during earthquakes. Part 2. Exact theory , 1978 .

[4]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Earthquake analysis of arch dams including dam–water interaction, reservoir boundary absorption and foundation flexibility , 1986 .

[5]  Shailendra K. Sharan Time‐domain analysis of infinite fluid vibration , 1987 .

[6]  Orlando Maeso,et al.  Earthquake Analysis of Arch Dams. II: Dam-Water-Foundation Interaction , 1993 .

[7]  Chongmin Song,et al.  The scaled boundary finite-element method—alias consistent infinitesimal finite-element cell method—for elastodynamics , 1997 .

[8]  J. Wolf,et al.  The scaled boundary finite-element method – a primer: derivations , 2000 .

[9]  John P. Wolf,et al.  The scaled boundary finite-element method – a primer: solution procedures , 2000 .

[10]  Patrick Paultre,et al.  A closed-form formulation for earthquake-induced hydrodynamic pressure on gravity dams , 2003 .

[11]  Chongmin Song,et al.  Transient analysis of wave propagation in non‐homogeneous elastic unbounded domains by using the scaled boundary finite‐element method , 2006 .

[12]  Yin Lu Young,et al.  The effects of reservoir geometry on the seismic response of gravity dams , 2007 .

[13]  S. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Hydrodynamic pressure on a vertical gate considering fluid-structure interaction , 2008 .

[14]  J. Avilés,et al.  Effects of surface waves on hydrodynamic pressures on rigid dams with arbitrary upstream face , 2009 .

[15]  Damodar Maity,et al.  A novel procedure for determination of hydrodynamic pressure along upstream face of dams due to earthquakes , 2010 .

[16]  Najib Bouaanani,et al.  A new formulation and error analysis for vibrating dam–reservoir systems with upstream transmitting boundary conditions , 2010 .

[17]  Gao Lin,et al.  An efficient approach for frequency‐domain and time‐domain hydrodynamic analysis of dam–reservoir systems , 2012 .

[18]  Lidija Zdravković,et al.  Numerical modelling of hydrodynamic pressures on dams , 2013 .

[19]  H. Cifuentes,et al.  Influence of reservoir geometry and conditions on the seismic response of arch dams , 2014 .

[20]  Najib Bouaanani,et al.  Effects of fluid–structure interaction modeling assumptions on seismic floor acceleration demands within gravity dams , 2014 .

[21]  Gao Lin,et al.  Novel Nonreflecting Boundary Condition for an Infinite Reservoir Based on the Scaled Boundary Finite-Element Method , 2015 .

[22]  Sundararajan Natarajan,et al.  Crack propagation modelling in concrete using the scaled boundary finite element method with hybrid polygon–quadtree meshes , 2016, International Journal of Fracture.

[23]  Lin Wang,et al.  Fluid structure interaction modelling of horizontal-axis wind turbine blades based on CFD and FEA , 2016 .

[24]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Liquid sloshing in partly-filled laterally-excited cylindrical tanks equipped with multi baffles , 2016 .

[25]  Vicente Negro,et al.  Influence of temperature and salinity on hydrodynamic forces , 2016 .

[26]  He Xu,et al.  Study on the effects of hydrodynamic pressure on the dynamic stresses in slabs of high CFRD based on the scaled boundary finite-element method , 2016 .

[27]  Hauke Gravenkamp,et al.  Efficient wave propagation simulation on quadtree meshes using SBFEM with reduced modal basis , 2017 .

[28]  Chongmin Song,et al.  Analysis of transient wave scattering and its applications to site response analysis using the scaled boundary finite-element method , 2017 .

[29]  He Xu,et al.  Error study of Westergaard's approximation in seismic analysis of high concrete-faced rockfill dams based on SBFEM , 2017 .

[30]  C. Jiang,et al.  Probabilistic crack trajectory analysis by a dimension reduction method , 2017 .