Contagion or restitution? When bad apples can motivate ethical behavior

Abstract When there is a “bad apple” in the group, are we more likely to follow the example or compensate for their sins? Three experiments showed that whether a group member’s unethical actions lead to contagion or restitution depends on the presence of out-group observers. In Experiment 1, participants were more likely to compensate for the transgression of an in-group member than an out-group member when there were out-group observers. Experiment 2 varied the presence of out-group observers and showed that such compensatory behaviors occur only in the presence of out-group members. We suggest that the presence of out-group observers trigger a self-categorization process that induces guilt in individuals for their group members’ transgressions. Indeed, associated guilt mediated the relationship between in-group member’s unethical behavior and participants’ compensatory behavior (Experiment 3). These results suggest that norms implied by others’ behavior and group categorization are important determinants of ethical behavior.

[1]  J. Swim,et al.  White Guilt: Its Antecedents and Consequences for Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action , 1999 .

[2]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Guilty by Association : When One ' s Group Has a Negative History , 2001 .

[3]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  Mediation analysis. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  A. Manstead,et al.  Guilty by Association: When One's Group Has a Negative History , 1998 .

[6]  Robert C. Ford,et al.  Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature , 1994 .

[7]  John C. Turner,et al.  Rediscovering the Social Group , 1987 .

[8]  D. Ariely,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Contagion and Differentiation in Unethical Behavior The Effect of One Bad Apple on the Barrel , 2022 .

[9]  Nyla R. Branscombe,et al.  In-Group or Out-Group Extemity: Importance of the Threatened Social Identity , 1993 .

[10]  I. Newby-Clark,et al.  My friend is embarrassing me: exploring the guilty by association effect. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[12]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Awareness of Consequences and the Influence of Moral Norms on Interpersonal Behavior , 1968 .

[13]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[14]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[15]  V. Smith,et al.  Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply , 1999 .

[16]  Terry W. Loe,et al.  A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business , 2000 .

[17]  V. Smith,et al.  Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games , 2000 .

[18]  M. Biernat,et al.  Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection? , 2003 .

[19]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification , 1988 .