A Typology of Affordances: Untangling Sociomaterial Interactions through Video Analysis

In this study we untangle the sociomaterial interactions between developers, users, and artifacts by analyzing what types of affordances occur in the interactions between actors and artifacts in the context of group generativity. Hereto, we conducted an indepth ethnographic and interaction analysis of video data of the interactions of groups of people with each other and with a set of self-developed applications for supporting generative activities. On the basis of our findings, we propose a typology of affordances. Given that affordances are by definition sociomaterial, studying affordances helps us to provide empirical insights into sociomateriality. Furthermore, this typology of affordances enables us to empirically analyze the role of materiality as well as to theoretically explain how materiality affects the way people act and interact with each other and artifacts. Finally, important theoretical and methodological implications for the literature on sociomateriality are discussed.

[1]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[2]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  Authors’ Addresses , 2006 .

[3]  M. Callon,et al.  Некоторые элементы социологии перевода: приручение морских гребешков и рыболовов бухты Сен-Бриё , 2017 .

[4]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[5]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Motivational Affordances : Fundamental Reasons for ICT Design and Use , 2007 .

[6]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[7]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Understanding practice: video as a medium for reflection and design (excerpt) , 1992 .

[8]  P. Leonardi,et al.  What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing , 2010 .

[9]  Karen Barad Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[10]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[11]  K. K. Cetina Sociality with Objects , 1997 .

[12]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[13]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[14]  J. J. Gibson The theory of affordances , 1977 .

[15]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  From generative fit to generative capacity: exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  J. Greeno Gibson's affordances. , 1994, Psychological review.

[18]  J. Law After Method: Mess in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[19]  L. Suchman Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[20]  W. E. Mackay,et al.  EVA: an experimental video annotator for symbolic analysis of video data , 1989, SGCH.

[21]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  A Confessional Account of an Ethnography About Knowledge Work , 2000, MIS Q..

[22]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .