Human-Nature Relations in Urban Gardens: Explorations with Camera Traps

As cities grow, their people become increasingly distanced from nature except within private and public green spaces. Sensing technologies provide a means to harness curiosity about the animals living in these spaces, and possibly also connect interest to care. Yet little is known as to how people may use these technologies, or the implications for human-nature relations. To learn more, we gave commercial camera traps to ten adult participants to understand how they explored their gardens, what they wanted to learn, and what they did with this knowledge. We discovered trade-offs between control and care; the usefulness of different media and mystery; the temporalities of engaging in natural sensing practice; and a prevalence of sharing media within households. We discuss design for convivial cohabitation with the creatures in our garden. This research contributes to better human-nature relations through citizen sensing, as well as HCI for urban biodiversity conservation.

[1]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Planning for the Future of Urban Biodiversity: A Global Review of City-Scale Initiatives , 2017 .

[2]  A. Schrader Abyssal intimacies and temporalities of care: How (not) to care about deformed leaf bugs in the aftermath of Chernobyl , 2015, Social studies of science.

[3]  Adrian Franklin,et al.  The more-than-human city , 2017 .

[4]  Gavan P. L. Watson Field birding and digital objects: immaterial technologies and their implications for one practice of coming to know the more-than-human , 2011 .

[5]  Jennifer Gabrys Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City , 2014 .

[6]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  The Ambient Birdhouse: An IoT Device to Discover Birds and Engage with Nature , 2018, CHI.

[7]  Richard A. Fuller,et al.  Cities are hotspots for threatened species , 2016 .

[8]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera traps in animal ecology : methods and analyses , 2011 .

[10]  F. Pilla,et al.  The Internet of Nature: How taking nature online can shape urban ecosystems , 2019, The Anthropocene Review.

[11]  C. Maller,et al.  Snakes in the city: understanding urban residents' responses to greening interventions for biodiversity , 2018 .

[12]  Julian R. A. Swinkels Staying with the trouble: making kin in the Chthulucene , 2018 .

[13]  Laura Forlano,et al.  Decentering the Human in the Design of Collaborative Cities , 2016, Design Issues.

[14]  P. Meek,et al.  Camera Traps Can Be Heard and Seen by Animals , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  Jamie Lorimer,et al.  Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies , 2010 .

[16]  Brian L. Sullivan,et al.  eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences , 2009 .

[17]  D. Swann,et al.  1 Camera trapping for animal monitoring and management: a review of applications , 2014 .

[18]  Maria Puig De La Bellacasa,et al.  Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds , 2017 .

[19]  Clara Mancini,et al.  The Emerging Nature of Participation in Multispecies Interaction Design , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[20]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005 .

[21]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Designing for Cohabitation: Naturecultures, Hybrids, and Decentering the Human in Design , 2017, CHI.

[22]  Alessandro Soro,et al.  Designing in the Network of Relations for Species Conservation: The Playful Tingtibi Community Birdhouse , 2020, CHI.

[23]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management , 2017 .

[24]  Eric T. Meyer,et al.  Creation and Control in the Photographic Process: iPhones and the emerging fifth moment of photography , 2012 .

[25]  M. Townsend Feel blue? Touch green! Participation in forest/woodland management as a treatment for depression , 2006 .

[26]  Tuck Wah Leong,et al.  A process of engagement: engaging with the process , 2012, DIS '12.

[27]  ‘URBAN & SUBURBAN NATURE INTERACTIONS’, IMPACTS AND SERENDIPITOUS NARRATIVES OF THE MY NATUREWATCH PROJECT , 2020, Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference.

[28]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  How two billion smartphone users can save species! , 2017, Interactions.

[29]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Collaborative Exploration and Sensemaking of Big Environmental Sound Data , 2017, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[30]  William W. Gaver,et al.  My Naturewatch Camera: Disseminating Practice Research with a Cheap and Easy DIY Design , 2019, CHI.

[31]  Timothy Hodgetts,et al.  Methodologies for animals’ geographies: cultures, communication and genomics , 2015 .

[32]  Mark A. Goddard,et al.  Global patterns and drivers of urban bird diversity , 2017 .

[33]  María Puig de la Bellacasa Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. , 2015, Social studies of science.

[34]  A. McGregor,et al.  Photo-response: approaching participatory photography as a more-than-human research method , 2018 .

[35]  Grete Grindal Patil,et al.  Biophilia: Does Visual Contact with Nature Impact on Health and Well-Being? , 2009, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[36]  J. Heerwagen Biophilia, health, and well-being , 2009 .

[37]  F. Dunaway Hunting with the Camera: Nature Photography, Manliness, and Modern Memory, 1890–1930 , 2000, Journal of American Studies.

[38]  Alec Foster,et al.  Citizen Science for Urban Forest Management? Predicting the Data Density and Richness of Urban Forest Volunteered Geographic Information , 2017 .

[39]  Oskar Juhlin,et al.  Theorizing animal-computer interaction as machinations , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[40]  L. Campbell,et al.  Restorative Commons: Creating Health and Well-Being Through Urban Landscapes , 2009 .

[41]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Exploration of Aural & Visual Media About Birds Informs Lessons for Citizen Science Design , 2020, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[42]  Ulla Mörtberg,et al.  A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  E. Minor,et al.  Having our yards and sharing them too: the collective effects of yards on native bird species in an urban landscape. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[44]  Karin Lindström,et al.  When Species Meet , 2016 .

[45]  D. Gooch Amplifying Quiet voices Challenges and opportunities for participatory design at an urban scale , 2017 .

[46]  C. Lintott,et al.  Snapshot Serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African savanna , 2015, Scientific Data.

[47]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  More-Than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things , 2019, The Design Journal.

[48]  Diana MacCallum,et al.  Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’ in planning theory , 2018 .

[49]  Rob Comber,et al.  Connected seeds and sensors: co-designing internet of things for sustainable smart cities with urban food-growing communities , 2018, PDC.

[50]  J. Derrida,et al.  The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow) , 2002, Critical Inquiry.

[51]  W. Odum,et al.  Environmental Degradation and the Tyranny of Small Decisions , 1982 .

[52]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Understanding photowork , 2006, CHI.

[53]  Elizabeth Goodman,et al.  Three environmental discourses in human-computer interaction , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.