A novel software tool for semi-automatic quantification of thoracic aorta dilatation on baseline and follow-up computed tomography angiography

A dedicated software package that could semi-automatically assess differences in aortic maximal cross-sectional diameters from consecutive CT scans would most likely reduce the post-processing time and effort by the physicians. The aim of this study was to present and assess the quality of a new tool for the semi-automatic quantification of thoracic aorta dilation dimensions. Twenty-nine patients with two CTA scans of the thoracic aorta for which the official clinical report indicated an increase in aortic diameters were included in the study. Aortic maximal cross-sectional diameters of baseline and follow-up studies generated semi-automatically by the software were compared with corresponding manual measurements. The semi-automatic measurements were performed at seven landmarks defined on the baseline scan by two operators. Bias, Bland–Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated between the two methods and, for the semi-automatic software, also between two observers. The average time difference between the two scans of a single patient was 1188 ± 622 days. For the semi-automatic software, in 2 out of 29 patients, manual interaction was necessary; in the remaining 27 patients (93.1%), semi-automatic results were generated, demonstrating excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (all values ≥ 0.91) and small differences, especially for the proximal aortic arch (baseline: 0.19 ± 1.30 mm; follow-up: 0.44 ± 2.21 mm), the mid descending aorta (0.37 ± 1.64 mm; 0.37 ± 2.06 mm), and the diaphragm (0.30 ± 1.14 mm; 0.37 ± 1.80 mm). The inter-observer variability was low with all errors in diameters ≤ 1 mm, and intraclass correlation coefficients all ≥ 0.95. The semi-automatic tool decreased the processing time by 40% (13 vs. 22 min). In this work, a semi-automatic software package that allows the assessment of thoracic aorta diameters from baseline and follow-up CTs (and their differences), was presented, and demonstrated high accuracy and low inter-observer variability.

[1]  V. Aboyans,et al.  [2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases]. , 2015, Kardiologia polska.

[2]  F. Rengier,et al.  Reliability of semiautomatic centerline analysis versus manual aortic measurement techniques for TEVAR among non-experts. , 2011, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Segmentation and quantification of the aortic arch using joint 3D model-based segmentation and elastic image registration , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Souvik Sen,et al.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ame , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Eric Therasse,et al.  Measurements and detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Accuracy and reproducibility of a segmentation software. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[7]  J. Dehmeshki,et al.  Variability of ascending aorta diameter measurements as assessed with electrocardiography-gated multidetector computerized tomography and computer assisted diagnosis software. , 2010, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery.

[8]  Philippe C. Cattin,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Vessel Lumen from 3D CTA Images of Aortic Dissection , 2006, Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin.

[9]  Rossella Fattori,et al.  Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  Gilles Soulez,et al.  Clinical validation of a software for quantitative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm maximal diameter and growth by CT angiography. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[11]  L. Quint,et al.  Proximal thoracic aortic diameter measurements at CT: repeatability and reproducibility according to measurement method , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[12]  J. Reiber,et al.  Automatic detection of aorto-femoral vessel trajectory from whole-body computed tomography angiography data sets , 2016, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[13]  Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt,et al.  Segmentation of branching vascular structures using adaptive subdivision surface fitting , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Personalized learning-based segmentation of thoracic aorta and main branches for diagnosis and treatment planning , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[15]  Jorge Juan Suárez-Cuenca,et al.  A hybrid method based on level set and 3D region growing for segmentation of the thoracic aorta , 2013, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[16]  Yan Yang,et al.  Analysis of the thoracic aorta using a semi-automated post processing tool. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[17]  Bo Xu,et al.  Automatic extraction of arterial centerline from whole-body computed tomography angiographic datasets , 2014, Computing in Cardiology 2014.