The Availability, Cost, Limitations, Learning Curve and Future of Robotic Systems in Urology and Prostate Cancer Surgery

Robot-assisted surgical systems (RASS) have revolutionised the management of many urological conditions over the last two decades with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) now being considered by many to be the preferred surgical approach. Intuitive Surgical has dominated the market during this time period with successive iterations of the da Vinci model. The expiration of patents has opened the RASS market and several new contenders have become available or are currently in development. This comprehensive narrative review aims to explore the merits of each robotic system as well as the evidence and barriers to their use. The newly developed RASS have increased the versality of robotic surgical systems to a wider range of settings through advancement in technology. The increased competition may result in an overall reduction in cost, broadening the accessibility of RASS. Learning curves and training remain a barrier to their use, but the situation appears to be improving through dedicated training programmes. Outcomes for RARP have been well investigated and tend to support improved early functional outcomes. Overall, the rapid developments in the field of robot-assisted surgery indicate the beginning of a promising new era to further enhance urological surgery.

[1]  S. Psutka,et al.  Robot‐assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a systematic review of perioperative outcomes , 2023, BJU international.

[2]  P. Kallidonis,et al.  The feasibility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: an experimental study , 2022, World Journal of Urology.

[3]  P. Kallidonis,et al.  Robot assisted radical nephrectomy using the novel Avatera robotic surgical system: a feasibility study in a porcine model. , 2022, Journal of endourology.

[4]  Abstracts of the 39th World Congress of Endourology: WCE 2022 , 2022, Journal of Endourology.

[5]  S. Snyder,et al.  Systematic literature review of cost-effectiveness analyses of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer , 2022, BMJ Open.

[6]  P. Umari,et al.  Cost-analysis of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in Europe: A cross-country comparison. , 2022, European Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  T. Jang,et al.  Single Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Short-term Outcomes and Learning Curve. , 2022, Journal of endourology.

[8]  N. Hinata,et al.  Hinotori Surgical Robot System, a novel robot‐assisted surgical platform: Preclinical and clinical evaluation , 2022, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[9]  P. Fox,et al.  The environmental impact of surgery: A systematic review. , 2022, Surgery.

[10]  I. Alkatout,et al.  Assessment of the Versius Robotic Surgical System in Minimal Access Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[11]  P. Aceto,et al.  The new surgical robotic platform HUGOTM RAS: System description and docking settings for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy , 2022, Urologia.

[12]  A. Vanhoestenberghe,et al.  Environmental sustainability in robotic and laparoscopic surgery: systematic review. , 2022, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  M. Paciotti,et al.  Robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy feasibility and setting with the Hugo™ robot‐assisted surgery system , 2022, BJU international.

[14]  G. Pellino,et al.  Robotic Abdominal Surgery and COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Published Literature and Peer-Reviewed Guidelines during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[15]  Faizan Naeem,et al.  Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review , 2022, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[16]  M. Paciotti,et al.  Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Novel Hugo Robotic System: Initial Experience and Optimal Surgical Set-up at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center. , 2022, European urology.

[17]  D. Enikeev,et al.  Systematic review: the learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy. What do we know? , 2022, Journal of endourology.

[18]  D. Olvera-Posada,et al.  Single‐port versus multiport robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis on the da Vinci SP platform , 2022, The Prostate.

[19]  Danielle Julian,et al.  Assessment of the training program for Versius, a new innovative robotic system for use in minimal access surgery , 2021, BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies.

[20]  E. Haglind,et al.  Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up. , 2021, European urology.

[21]  Suzanne B. Merrill,et al.  Integration of Robotics in Urology Residency Programs: an Unchecked Technological Revolution , 2021, Current Urology Reports.

[22]  B. Hadaschik,et al.  Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2021, European urology focus.

[23]  K. Rha,et al.  Comparing Revo-i and da Vinci in Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a preliminary propensity score analysis of outcomes. , 2021, Journal of endourology.

[24]  N. Samalavicius,et al.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Senhance® robotic platform: single center experience , 2021, World Journal of Urology.

[25]  T. Kuliš,et al.  Upper urinary tract surgery and radical prostatectomy with Senhance® robotic system: Single center experience—First 100 cases , 2021, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[26]  L. Fourcade,et al.  Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons. , 2021, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[27]  Zain Ali Zaidi,et al.  Telesurgery and Robotics: An Improved and Efficient Era , 2021, Cureus.

[28]  A. Tafuri,et al.  Robotic surgery in urology: a narrative review from the beginning to the single-site , 2021, AME Medical Journal.

[29]  M. Solomon,et al.  Detailed cost of robotic-assisted surgery in the Australian public health sector: from implementation to a multi-specialty caseload , 2020, BMC Health Services Research.

[30]  B. Keeler,et al.  Robotic surgery: training, competence assessment and credentialing , 2020, The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[31]  Jonathan Clarke,et al.  Uptake and accessibility of surgical robotics in England , 2020, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[32]  P. Dahm,et al.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2020, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[33]  M. Slack,et al.  Usability assessment of Versius, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access surgery , 2020, BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies.

[34]  G. Stewart,et al.  Preclinical Evaluation of the Versius Surgical System, a New Robot-assisted Surgical Device for Use in Minimal Access Renal and Prostate Surgery. , 2020, European urology focus.

[35]  V. Patel,et al.  Technical Modifications Necessary to Implement the da Vinci Single-port Robotic System. , 2020, European urology.

[36]  D. Hashimoto,et al.  Systematic review of learning curves in robot‐assisted surgery , 2019, BJS open.

[37]  I. Frank,et al.  Initial Experience with da Vinci Single-port Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomies. , 2020, European urology.

[38]  Bhavan Prasad Rai,et al.  The role of robotic surgery in the management of renal tract calculi. , 2019, Translational andrology and urology.

[39]  S. Murgu Robotic assisted-bronchoscopy: technical tips and lessons learned from the initial experience with sampling peripheral lung lesions , 2019, BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

[40]  G. Scambia,et al.  Joint consensus on anesthesia in urologic and gynecologic robotic surgery: specific issues in management from a task force of the SIAARTI, SIGO, and SIU. , 2019, Minerva anestesiologica.

[41]  D. Parekh,et al.  Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, The Journal of urology.

[42]  E. Haglind,et al.  Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial. , 2018, European urology.

[43]  Y. Choi,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Procedures Performed Using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System at a Single Institute in Korea: Experience with 10000 Cases , 2018, Yonsei medical journal.

[44]  Y. Choi,et al.  Retzius‐sparing robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo‐i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial , 2018, BJU international.

[45]  A. Koupparis,et al.  Expanding the indications of robotic surgery in urology: A systematic review of the literature , 2018, Arab journal of urology.

[46]  P. Dasgupta The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) consensus documents on andrology , 2018, BJU international.

[47]  P. Rao Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition! , 2018, World Journal of Urology.

[48]  G. Strippoli,et al.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[49]  Charles Bih-Shiou Tsang,et al.  The da Vinci Xi: a review of its capabilities, versatility, and potential role in robotic colorectal surgery , 2017, Robotic surgery.

[50]  L. N. Beck,et al.  Complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery distant from the surgical site , 2017, British journal of anaesthesia.

[51]  Massimo Niola,et al.  Malfunctions of robotic system in surgery: role and responsibility of surgeon in legal point of view , 2016, Open medicine.

[52]  Siddharth Yadav,et al.  Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery , 2016, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[53]  A. Tewari,et al.  A Multidimensional Analysis of Prostate Surgery Costs in the United States: Robotic-Assisted versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy. , 2016, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[54]  K. Rha,et al.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, European urology.

[55]  T. Wen,et al.  Positioning-related complications of minimally invasive radical prostatectomies. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[56]  J. Felblinger,et al.  Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon's physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[57]  A. Supe,et al.  Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery , 2010, Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.

[58]  Guy E. Thwaites,et al.  The Diagnosis and Management of Tuberculous Meningitis , 2002, Practical Neurology.

[59]  G. Sung,et al.  Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems. , 2001, Urology.

[60]  Jacques Marescaux,et al.  Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery , 2001, Nature.

[61]  D. L. Forkey,et al.  The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons’ upper extremity workload , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[62]  J. Binder,et al.  Robotically‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2001, BJU international.

[63]  F. Zattoni,et al.  European Association of Urology GUIDELINES ON PROSTATE CANCER , 2001 .

[64]  B. Davies,et al.  A surgeon robot prostatectomy--a laboratory evaluation. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.