Teachers’ Noticing Engineering In Everyday Objects And Processes

Engineers have been so successful at seamlessly integrating their achievements into the fabric of our daily lives that we often overlook how they influence our lives. Pearson and Young 1 discuss this paradox to emphasize the importance of increasing technological literacy of everyone. Prior studies of people’s (children and adults) perceptions of engineering describe peoples’ ability to notice the visible aspect of engineering created by civil (buildings, bridges), mechanical (cars, machines) and electrical engineering (electrical energy that runs our machines). An examination of their descriptions of engineering, however, often contains misconceptions. If teachers are part of the solution to develop students’ awareness of engineering, then we need to better understand their abilities to identify engineering within the world and to talk about it with their students. Our study evaluates teachers’ abilities to notice what is engineering in common products that we interact with each day (e.g., milk carton, apple peeler, water filter) and to identify the work of engineers in the field (e.g., environmental). Further we asked teachers to share how they would explain to their students how pictures pre-selected by engineering education researchers relate to engineering. In this paper, we share our coding scheme for teachers’ responses, and we compare their development from preto postparticipation in our summer professional development activities. This method builds on prior studies that use photos as stimulus responses. Unlike other studies, we are systematically exploring specific image types that elicit response to a wide range of engineering products and processes that influence our lives. In addition, we are looking to see how well these methods work to differentiate various disciplines of engineering.

[1]  Deborah D. Heisley,et al.  Autodriving: A Photoelicitation Technique , 1991 .

[2]  Douglas Gorham,et al.  Engineering and Standards for Technological Literacy , 2002 .

[3]  de la Paz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Standards-Based High School Model Course Guide. Advancing Technological Literacy: ITEA Professional Series. , 2004 .

[4]  E. Taylor Using still photography in making meaning of adult educators' teaching beliefs , 2002 .

[5]  Christine Cunningham,et al.  AC 2007-8: ENGINEERING IS ELEMENTARY: AN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM FOR CHILDREN , 2007 .

[6]  T. Loeffler Looking Deeply In: Using Photo-Elicitation to Explore the Meanings of Outdoor Education Experiences , 2005 .

[7]  Marisol Clark-Ibáñez Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews , 2004 .

[8]  Matthew J. Mayhew Exploring the Essence of Spirituality: A Phenomenological Study of Eight Students with Eight Different Worldviews , 2004 .

[9]  Katie B. Douglas,et al.  Seeing as Well as Hearing: Responses to the Use of an Alternative Form of Data Representation in a Study of Students' Environmental Perceptions. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. , 1998 .

[10]  Cynthia A. Tananis,et al.  Generating grounded theory of/for educational practice: the journey of three epistemorphs , 2004 .

[11]  Sachiko Komagata Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. , 2004 .

[12]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a Tool to Investigate Students' Ideas about Engineers and Engineering , 2004 .

[13]  Greg Pearson,et al.  Technically speaking : why all Americans need to know more about technology , 2002 .

[14]  A. Radley,et al.  Images of Recovery: A Photo-Elicitation Study on the Hospital Ward , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[15]  Nancy Fjallbrant,et al.  Information literacy courses in engineering and science - the design and implementation of the DEDICATE courses , 1999 .

[16]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  Development of a Work Sampling Methodology for Behavioral Observations: Application to Teamwork , 2007 .

[17]  C. Z. Smith,et al.  Photo-Elicitation Method Gives Voice and Reactions of Subjects , 1998 .

[18]  Jacquelyn F. Sullivan,et al.  Exploiting Design to Inspire Interest in Engineering Across the K-16 Engineering Curriculum* , 2004 .

[19]  Elinor L. Brown Using Photography To Explore Hidden Realities and Raise Cross-Cultural Sensitivity in Future Teachers , 2005 .

[20]  Gloria J. Leckie,et al.  Information Literacy in Science and Engineering Undergraduate Education: Faculty Attitudes and Pedagogical Practices. , 1999 .

[21]  Jeffrey D. Samuels Breaking the Ethnographer’s Frames , 2004 .

[22]  Greg Pearson Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy. , 2006 .

[23]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[24]  Douglas A. Harper,et al.  Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation , 2002 .