Physical model for self-organization of actin cytoskeleton and adhesion complexes at the cell front.

Cell motion is driven by interplay between the actin cytoskeleton and the cell adhesions in the front part of the cell. The actin network segregates into lamellipodium and lamellum, whereas the adhesion complexes are characteristically distributed underneath the actin system. Here, we suggest a computational model for this characteristic organization of the actin-adhesion system. The model is based on the ability of the adhesion complexes to sense mechanical forces, the stick-slip character of the interaction between the adhesions and the moving actin network, and a hypothetical propensity of the actin network to disintegrate upon sufficiently strong stretching stresses. We identify numerically three possible types of system organization, all observed in living cells: two states in which the actin network exhibits segregation into lamellipodium and lamellum, whereas the cell edge either remains stationary or moves, and a state where the actin network does not undergo segregation. The model recovers the asynchronous fluctuations and outward bulging of the cell edge, and the dependence of the edge protrusion velocity on the rate of the nascent adhesion generation, the membrane tension, and the substrate rigidity.

[1]  A. Bausch,et al.  Viscoelasticity of isotropically cross-linked actin networks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[2]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  On the edge: modeling protrusion. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[3]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[5]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Myosin II contributes to cell-scale actin network treadmilling via network disassembly , 2010, Nature.

[6]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton , 2010, Nature.

[7]  Hanry Yu,et al.  Mechanotransduction In Vivo by Repeated Talin Stretch-Relaxation Events Depends upon Vinculin , 2011, PLoS biology.

[8]  G. Danuser,et al.  Coupling the dynamics of two actin networks--new views on the mechanics of cell protrusion. , 2005, Biochemical Society transactions.

[9]  Mark Schvartzman,et al.  Nanolithographic control of the spatial organization of cellular adhesion receptors at the single-molecule level. , 2011, Nano letters.

[10]  Klemens Rottner,et al.  Arp2/3 complex interactions and actin network turnover in lamellipodia , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[11]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[12]  G. Borisy,et al.  Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back , 2003, Science.

[13]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Impact of local versus global ligand density on cellular adhesion. , 2011, Nano letters.

[14]  T. Svitkina,et al.  Actin machinery: pushing the envelope. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[15]  R. Insall Dogma bites back--the evidence for branched actin. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[16]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Actin and α-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  Robert H Insall,et al.  Actin dynamics at the leading edge: from simple machinery to complex networks. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[18]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Cell migration at a glance , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[19]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Fluctuations of intracellular forces during cell protrusion , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  J. Käs,et al.  Growing actin networks form lamellipodium and lamellum by self-assembly. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[21]  P. Vallotton,et al.  Simultaneous mapping of filamentous actin flow and turnover in migrating cells by quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell mechanosensitivity controls the anisotropy of focal adhesions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  The switchable integrin adhesome , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[24]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Lamellipodial Actin Mechanically Links Myosin Activity with Adhesion-Site Formation , 2007, Cell.

[25]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Shear field mapping in actin networks by using magnetic tweezers , 2004, European Biophysics Journal.

[26]  J. Klafter,et al.  The nonlinear nature of friction , 2004, Nature.

[27]  David A Weitz,et al.  Chapter 19: Mechanical response of cytoskeletal networks. , 2008, Methods in cell biology.

[28]  Kurt I. Anderson,et al.  Contact dynamics during keratocyte motility , 2000, Current Biology.

[29]  D. Fletcher,et al.  An introduction to cell motility for the physical scientist , 2004, Physical biology.

[30]  Giovanni Dietler,et al.  Gradient of rigidity in the lamellipodia of migrating cells revealed by atomic force microscopy. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[31]  P. Mattila,et al.  Contractility-dependent actin dynamics in cardiomyocyte sarcomeres , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[32]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[33]  T. Svitkina,et al.  Role of focal adhesions and mechanical stresses in the formation and progression of the lamellipodium-lamellum interface [corrected]. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Suliana Manley,et al.  A role for actin arcs in the leading-edge advance of migrating cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[35]  J. Vasiliev Spreading of non-transformed and transformed cells. , 1985, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[36]  G. Oster,et al.  Cell motility driven by actin polymerization. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Florian Huber,et al.  Robust Organizational Principles of Protrusive Biopolymer Networks in Migrating Living Cells , 2011, PloS one.

[38]  Robijn Bruinsma,et al.  Theory of force regulation by nascent adhesion sites. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Tom Shemesh,et al.  Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: a physical mechanism. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[42]  Brian P Helmke,et al.  Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. , 2006, Developmental cell.

[43]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  C. Wolgemuth,et al.  Lamellipodial contractions during crawling and spreading. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[45]  Colin K. Choi,et al.  Integrins in cell migration – the actin connection , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[46]  Kimihide Hayakawa,et al.  Actin filaments function as a tension sensor by tension-dependent binding of cofilin to the filament , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[47]  David J Odde,et al.  Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.

[48]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Modeling cytoskeletal flow over adhesion sites: competition between stochastic bond dynamics and intracellular relaxation , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[49]  G. Danuser,et al.  Two Distinct Actin Networks Drive the Protrusion of Migrating Cells , 2004, Science.

[50]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Active cellular materials. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[51]  K. Burridge,et al.  Chapter 1. Focal adhesions: new angles on an old structure. , 2009, International review of cell and molecular biology.

[52]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[53]  L. Blanchoin,et al.  Cofilin increases the bending flexibility of actin filaments: implications for severing and cell mechanics. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  P. Chaikin,et al.  An elastic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes propulsion. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[55]  B. Geiger,et al.  The heel and toe of the cell's foot: a multifaceted approach for understanding the structure and dynamics of focal adhesions. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[56]  Yu-li Wang Flux at Focal Adhesions: Slippage Clutch, Mechanical Gauge, or Signal Depot , 2007, Science's STKE.

[57]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[58]  J. Small Dicing with dogma: de-branching the lamellipodium , 2010, Trends in cell biology.

[59]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biophysical properties of lipids and dynamic membranes. , 2006, Trends in cell biology.

[60]  L. Cramer,et al.  Molecular mechanism of actin-dependent retrograde flow in lamellipodia of motile cells. , 1997, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[61]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. , 1971, Experimental cell research.

[62]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  An Adhesion-Dependent Switch between Mechanisms That Determine Motile Cell Shape , 2011, PLoS biology.

[63]  Z. Kam,et al.  Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[64]  W. Thomas Catch bonds in adhesion. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[65]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[66]  Kinneret Keren,et al.  The Shape of Motile Cells , 2009, Current Biology.

[67]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Multi-level molecular clutches in motile cell processes. , 2009, Trends in cell biology.

[68]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Temporary increase in plasma membrane tension coordinates the activation of exocytosis and contraction during cell spreading , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Jonathan Stricker,et al.  Mechanics of the F-actin cytoskeleton. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[70]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Comparative Dynamics of Retrograde Actin Flow and Focal Adhesions: Formation of Nascent Adhesions Triggers Transition from Fast to Slow Flow , 2008, PloS one.

[71]  F. Brown Elastic modeling of biomembranes and lipid bilayers. , 2008, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[72]  J. Theriot,et al.  Crawling toward a unified model of cell mobility: spatial and temporal regulation of actin dynamics. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.

[73]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[74]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Tracking retrograde flow in keratocytes: news from the front. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[75]  E. M. De La Cruz How cofilin severs an actin filament , 2009, Biophysical reviews.

[76]  Reinhard Lipowsky,et al.  The conformation of membranes , 1991, Nature.

[77]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  TRANSMEMBRANE EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX – CYTOSKELETON CROSSTALK , 2001 .

[78]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[79]  H. Higgs Discussing the morphology of actin filaments in lamellipodia. , 2011, Trends in cell biology.