Legal, Practical, and Ethical Considerations for Making Online Patient Portals Accessible for All.

Largely driven by the financial incentives of the HITECH Act's Meaningful Use program as part of federal US health care reform, access to portal Web sites has rapidly expanded, allowing many patients to view their medical record information online. Despite this expansion, there is little attention paid to the accessibility of portals for more vulnerable patient populations-especially patients with limited health literacy or limited English proficiency, and individuals with disabilities. We argue that there are potential legal mandates for improving portal accessibility (e.g., the Civil Rights and the Rehabilitation Acts), as well as ethical considerations to prevent the exacerbation of existing health and health care disparities. To address these legal, practical, and ethical considerations, we present standards and broad recommendations that could greatly improve the reach and impact of portal Web sites.

[1]  C. Kruse,et al.  The Effect of Patient Portals on Quality Outcomes and Its Implications to Meaningful Use: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  Urmimala Sarkar,et al.  Care partners and online patient portals. , 2014, JAMA.

[3]  Michael K. Paasche-Orlow,et al.  The prevalence of limited health literacy , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  Gilles Clermont,et al.  Learning temporal rules to forecast instability in continuously monitored patients , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Svetlana Z. Lowry,et al.  Human factors guidance to prevent healthcare disparities with the adoption of EHRs , 2011 .

[6]  Bambang Parmanto,et al.  A case study examination of the impact of lawsuits on website accessibility , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[7]  S. Czaja,et al.  The Impact of Numeracy Ability and Technology Skills on Older Adults’ Performance of Health Management Tasks Using a Patient Portal , 2014, Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society.

[8]  A. Chen,et al.  The Legal Framework for Language Access in Healthcare Settings: Title VI and Beyond , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  Thomas H. Payne,et al.  Patient portals and personal health information online: perception, access, and use by US adults , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Courtney R. Lyles,et al.  Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: portals to nowhere? , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[12]  David R. Williams,et al.  Understanding and Addressing Racial Disparities in Health Care , 2000, Health care financing review.

[13]  Jessica S. Ancker,et al.  Expanding access to high-quality plain-language patient education information through context-specific hyperlinks , 2016, AMIA.

[14]  Robert Nguyen,et al.  Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..