Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space

Disoriented children could use geometric information in combination with landmark information to reorient themselves in large but not in small experimental spaces. We tested fish in the same task and found that they were able to conjoin geometric and non-geometric (landmark) information to reorient themselves in both the large and the small space used. Moreover, fish proved able to reorient immediately when dislocated from a large to a small experimental space and vice versa, suggesting that they encoded the relative rather than the absolute metrics of the environment. However, fish tended to make relatively more errors based on geometric information when transfer occurred from a small to a large space, and to make relatively more errors based on landmark information when transfer occurred from a large to a small space. The hypothesis is discussed that organisms are prepared to use only distant featural information as landmarks.

[1]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[2]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  TENS modulates spatial reorientantion in neglect patients , 2000, Neuroreport.

[6]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[7]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Conjoining information from different modules: A comparative perspective , 2002 .

[8]  Catherine Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task , 2001 .

[9]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visual Cognition and Representation in Birds and Primates , 2004 .

[10]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans: II. Generality Across Search Tasks , 1997 .

[11]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[12]  Edward J Golob,et al.  Differences between appetitive and aversive reinforcement on reorientation in a spatial working memory task , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Searching for the center: spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[14]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[15]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Lateralization of response to social stimuli in fishes: A comparison between different methods and species , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[16]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[17]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  The role of landmarks in cotton-top tamarin spatial foraging: evidence for geometric and non-geometric features , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[18]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[19]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language , 2003 .

[20]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Searching in the center: pigeons (Columba livid) encode relative distance from walls of an enclosure. , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[21]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[22]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Separate Geometric and Non-Geometric Modules for Spatial Reorientation: Evidence from a Lopsided Animal Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Lesley J. Rogers,et al.  Comparative vertebrate cognition : are primates superior to non-primates? , 2004 .

[24]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons encode relative geometry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[26]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[28]  P. Carruthers The cognitive functions of language , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought , 2003 .

[30]  M. Shatz Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (review) , 2006 .

[31]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[32]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Roots of brain specializations: preferential left-eye use during mirror-image inspection in six species of teleost fish , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Sources of Flexibility in Human Cognition: Dual-Task Studies of Space and Language , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.