Systemic capabilities as emergent properties: The source of IT business value

IT business value has been mostly conceptualized and examined based on pairwise relationships. This study argues that examining IT business value needs to consider the emergent properties generated from a firm as a whole system. Drawing on systems thinking and the resource-based view of the firm, this study develops a systemic model of IT business value and posits that IT impacts on firm performance when systemic capabilities as emergent properties are generated from the interactions among IT and organizational factors. The performance impact will be positive when IT and organizational factors work together or negative when they work counteractively. Relating IT business value to emergent properties makes a fresh contribution to the literature since IT business value has rarely been conceptualized at the systems level. Further, linking systemic capabilities at the systems level to the valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable conditions will help explain sustained competitive advantage. This paper also contributes to systems thinking by demonstrating its value as a conceptual lens through which the nature of IT business value can be understood.

[1]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[2]  Saggi Nevo,et al.  Firm-level benefits of IT-enabled resources: A conceptual extension and an empirical assessment , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  R. Ackoff Towards a System of Systems Concepts , 1971 .

[4]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[5]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[6]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[7]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[8]  Mie Augier,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[9]  C. Churchman,et al.  The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization , 1971 .

[10]  L. Bertalanffy The theory of open systems in physics and biology. , 1950 .

[11]  G. Cao A Four-Dimensional View of IT Business Value , 2010 .

[12]  Robert Kay,et al.  Emergence In Organizations: The Reflexive Turn , 2010 .

[13]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[14]  L. von Bertalanffy,et al.  The theory of open systems in physics and biology. , 1950, Science.

[15]  Varun Grover,et al.  Leveraging Information Technology Infrastructure to Facilitate a Firm's Customer Agility and Competitive Activity: An Empirical Investigation , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Joan Magretta,et al.  The Power of Virtual Integration: An Interview with Dell Computer''s Michael Dell , 1998 .

[17]  Saggi Nevo,et al.  The Formation and Value of IT-Enabled Resources: Antecedents and Consequences of Synergistic Relationships , 2010, MIS Q..

[18]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  Ervin Laszlo,et al.  The Contribution of the Systems Sciences to the Humanities , 1997 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[21]  Varun Grover,et al.  Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Robert Weetman Emergence Is Not Always 'Good' , 2009 .

[23]  M. Porter From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy , 1989 .

[24]  M. Leiblein What Do Resource- and Capability-Based Theories Propose? , 2011 .

[25]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Cross-Business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Michael Goold,et al.  Why diversify? Four decades of management thinking , 1993 .

[27]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[28]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[29]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms , 2006, MIS Q..