When Are People Persuaded By DNA Match Statistics?

[1]  Cardozo L. Rex,et al.  DNA EVIDENCE : PROBABILITY , POPULATION GENETICS , AND THE COURTS , 2003 .

[2]  J. Koehler,et al.  The Psychology of Numbers in the Courtroom: How to Make DNA Match Statistics Seem Impressive or Insufficient , 2001 .

[3]  N. Nuñez,et al.  The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Are absolute frequencies, relative frequencies, or both effective in reducing cognitive biases? , 2000 .

[5]  P. Slovic,et al.  Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency Formats , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[6]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[7]  D. Kaye,et al.  Reference Guide on DNA Evidence , 2000 .

[8]  Monica L. McCoy,et al.  The Effect of Jury Deliberations on Jurors' Reasoning Skills , 1999 .

[9]  Wibecke Brun,et al.  Judgments of risk and probability: the role of frequentistic information , 1999 .

[10]  Shari Seidman Diamond,et al.  Juror Reactions to DNA Evidence: Errors and Expectancies , 1999 .

[11]  R. Nichols,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1999, Heredity.

[12]  F Taroni,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[13]  F Taroni,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 1: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of DNA evidence. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[14]  Colin Allen,et al.  The evolution of mind , 1998 .

[15]  Joseph L. Gastwirth,et al.  Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence , 1997 .

[16]  William G. Hill,et al.  The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence. By Committee on DNA Forensic Science: an Update, National Research Council. National Academy Press, 1996. 254 pages. Price £30.95, hard cover. ISBN 0 309 05395 1. , 1997 .

[17]  Jonathan J. Koehler,et al.  One in Millions, Billions and Trillions: Lessons from People V. Collins (1968) for People V. Simpson (1995) , 1997 .

[18]  G. Gigerenzer.  Ecological intelligence: An adaptation for frequencies , 1997 .

[19]  D. Sarel,et al.  Nonunique invulnerability : Singular versus distributional probabilities and unrealistic optimism in comparative risk judgments , 1996 .

[20]  James G. Helgeson,et al.  The effects of statistical training on choice heuristics in choice under uncertainty , 1996 .

[21]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Jurors' use of probabilistic evidence , 1996 .

[22]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Cognition.

[23]  John Tooby,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all , 1996 .

[24]  J. Koehler.  On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence: Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios and Error Rates , 1996 .

[25]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[26]  Bernard Robertson,et al.  Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom , 1995 .

[27]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .

[28]  Samuel Lindsey,et al.  The Random Match Probability (RMP) in DNA Evidence: Irrelevant and Prejudicial? , 1995 .

[29]  Eric R. Stone,et al.  Risk communication: absolute versus relative expressions of low-probability risks , 1994 .

[30]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  DNA fingerprinting dispute laid to rest , 1994, Nature.

[31]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  R. Fildes.  Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B): Gary K. Grunwald, Adrian E. Raftery and Peter Guttorp, 1993, “Time series of continuous proportions”, 55, 103–116.☆ , 1993 .

[33]  Laurence D. Mueller.  The use of DNA typing in forensic science , 1993 .

[34]  Robert S. Lockhart,et al.  Distributional versus singular approaches to probability and errors in probabilistic reasoning , 1993 .

[35]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking , 1993 .

[36]  Some practical judgment and decision-making research. , 1993 .

[37]  Richard Lempert.  Inside the juror: Why do jury research? , 1993 .

[38]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[39]  S Epstein,et al.  Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: further evidence for two conceptual systems. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Naked Statistical Evidence of Liability: Is Subjective Probability Enough? , 1992 .

[41]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  S Epstein,et al.  Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: evidence for two conceptual systems. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  David H. Kaye,et al.  Can Jurors Understand Probabilistic Evidence , 1991 .

[44]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in the Courts , 1990 .

[45]  Christopher R. Hart,et al.  LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS , 1990 .

[46]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Thinking backward: some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness , 1989 .

[47]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  When a coincidence is suspicious: the role of mental simulation , 1989 .

[48]  William C. Thompson,et al.  Are Juries Competent to Evaluate Statistical Evidence , 1989 .

[49]  A. D. Pearman,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader , 1999 .

[50]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Bayes' theorem in the trial process , 1988 .

[51]  W. Thompson,et al.  Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials , 1987 .

[52]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Teaching reasoning. , 1987, Science.

[53]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[54]  A. Tversky,et al.  Variants of uncertainty , 1982, Cognition.

[55]  Michael J. Saks,et al.  Human Information Processing and Adjudication: Trial by Heuristics , 1980 .

[56]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Law and Society Review , 1979 .

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[58]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .