Collaboration is becoming a new current paradigm for product manufacturing, as computer networks facilitate collaboration with partners located in widely distributed locations. Computer network technologies allow a large number of candidate partners to be examined for possible collaboration, so that the most suitable partner, or partners, can be selected from a broader, more diverse group than previously possible. In order to take best advantage of the collaboration paradigm, the precise method for selecting collaborative product development partners is an important technological point. Failed multicompany collaboration projects can do serious harm to the member companies on a number of fronts, in terms of financial cost, loss of prestige, loss of market share, and so on. The optimal collaboration partners should be selected from a group of candidates, so that production of new products can be achieved at a minimum cost, both financial and in terms of effort and expended resources. This paper proposes a decision supporting method for selecting an optimum collaborative product development partner from a group of potential partners. First, the effectiveness of collaborative product development and the need for a partner selection method is clarified. Next, a method for selecting the most suitable product development partner is constructed. Here, technologies that are required for developing the new product are classified into two groups: (1) technologies that have already been developed, and (2) technologies that must be newly developed. The proposed method first excludes unsuitable candidate partners, based on their achievement level concerning existing required technologies, and then selects the most suitable partner from the standpoint of technologies that must be newly developed. Finally, a case study is given to demonstrate the utility of the proposed method.
[1]
Fu-Ren Lin,et al.
Effects of information sharing on supply chain performance in electronic commerce
,
2002,
IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.
[2]
Timothy Darr,et al.
Hierarchical Concurrent Engineering
,
1996
.
[3]
W. Mitchell,et al.
SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODS
,
1996
.
[4]
Masataka Yoshimura,et al.
Synergy Effects of Sharing Knowledge During Cooperative Product Design
,
1998
.
[5]
Masayoshi Yoshimura.
Collaborative optimization for product design and manufacturing
,
2002,
CAD.
[6]
Hans J. Thamhain,et al.
Managing technology-based projects in multinational environments
,
2000,
IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.
[7]
Masataka Yoshimura,et al.
Collaborative Design among Different Fields in Mobile-Agent Environments
,
2001,
Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..
[8]
Steven D. Eppinger,et al.
Sloan School of Management Working Paper Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunications Industry Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunica
,
2022
.
[9]
Yuji Naka,et al.
Optimization of the Distributed Systems by Autonomous Cooperation —Distributed Maximum Principle—
,
1994
.
[10]
Jiati Deng,et al.
A Concurrent Workflow Management Process for Integrated Product Development
,
1998
.
[11]
John E. Renaud,et al.
Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization
,
1997
.
[12]
John A. Kuprenas.
Project Management Actions to Improve Design Phase Cost Performance
,
2003
.
[13]
Yan Jin,et al.
Agent-based Knowledge Management for Collaborative Engineering
,
1999
.