Principles of feature integration in visual perception

Several recent theories of visual information processing have postulated that errors in recognition may result not only from a failure in feature extraction, but also from a failure to correctly join features after they have been correctly extracted. Errors that result from incorrectly integrating features are called conjunction errors. The present study uses conjunction errors to investigate the principles used by the visual system to integrate features. The research tests whether the visual system is more likely to integrate features located close together in visual space (the location principle) or whether the visual system is more likely to integrate features from stimulus items that come from the same perceptual group or object (the perceptual group principle). In four target-detection experiments, stimuli were created so that feature integration by the location principle and feature integration by the perceptual group principle made different predictions for performance. In all of the experiments, the perceptual group principle predicted feature integration even though the distance between stimulus items and retinal eccentricity were strictly controlled.

[1]  C. R. Snyder Selection, inspection, and naming in visual search. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  D. Kahneman Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[3]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[4]  N Weisstein,et al.  Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.

[5]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[6]  D. Rumelhart,et al.  Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words. , 1974, Psychological review.

[7]  G Wolford,et al.  Perturbation model for letter identification. , 1975, Psychological review.

[8]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Configurational effects in visual information processing , 1976 .

[9]  D Marr,et al.  Early processing of visual information. , 1976, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  Lawrence C. Sager,et al.  Perception of wholes and of their component parts: some configural superiority effects. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Good continuation affects visual detection , 1977 .

[12]  Elizabeth L Bjork,et al.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing. , 1977, Psychological review.

[13]  W. Banks,et al.  Figural goodness effects in perception and memory , 1979 .

[14]  K H Shum,et al.  Evidence for feature perturbations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  G. Underwood Strategies of information processing , 1980 .

[16]  H E Egeth,et al.  Interference in letter identification: A test of feature-specific inhibition , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  S. Coren,et al.  Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: the gestalt illusions. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.