Feedback processing as parallel task in P300 conditioning.

Previous reports on conditioning P300 amplitude indicated that downtraining produced a stronger effect than uptraining. This asymmetry can be due to the effect of drain on processing resources of the brain produced by the attempts to use feedback information (parallel task effect). Such a drain should reduce P300 amplitude regardless of the direction of training. The aim of the experiment was to demonstrate this effect. Event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by light stimuli in a standard odd-ball procedure were recorded from Fz, Cz and Pz scalp sites. Subjects were instructed to enlarge or to reduce the P300 amplitude. The first 30 presentations of the target stimulus were analyzed during which the effect of learning should be negligible and processing of feedback information should be intensive. ERPs recorded during uptraining and downtraining were compared with the no-feedback recordings. As predicted, downtraining significantly reduced the P300 amplitude even in the first session of learning. Unexpectedly, uptraining recordings did not differ from no-feedback ERPs but differed significantly from downtraining waves. Such results support the prediction that feedback procedures involve a number of processes that alter the P300 amplitude even before the effects of learning can be expected. But if the hypothesis of the parallel task is to be accepted there must be another instantaneous process that compensates for P300 amplitude reduction during uptraining.

[1]  C D Wickens,et al.  The Event-Related Brain Potential as an Index of Display-Monitoring Workload , 1980, Human factors.

[2]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Ongoing pain as a mental workload indexed by P300 depression: discrimination of real and feigned pain conditions. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Novel environment as a stress-inducing factor. An event-related potentials study. , 1998, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[4]  R. Verleger Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  R Kakigi,et al.  [Event-related brain potentials]. , 1997, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[6]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Ongoing ischemic pain as a workload indexed by P3 amplitude and latency in real-versus feigned-pain conditions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Operant conditioning of P300 , 1992, Biological Psychology.

[8]  A. Michalski The effect of tonic pain on processing the non-painful stimuli indexed by late components of event-related potentials. , 1998, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[9]  H. Shabsin Feedback Controlled Increases in P300 Visual Evoked Potential Amplitudes and Neurological Functioning and Academic Performance in Learning Disabled Children , 1982 .

[10]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Biofeedback of event-related potentials. , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  E. Sirevaag,et al.  A Psychophysiological Assessment of Operator Workload During Simulated Flight Missions , 1987, Human factors.

[13]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[14]  A. Michalski The effect of accomplishment and failure on P300 potentials evoked by neutral stimuli , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  J. Polich P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  C. Braun,et al.  Somatosensory event-related potentials to painful and non-painful stimuli: effects of attention , 1989, Pain.

[17]  C Braun,et al.  Biofeedback of visual evoked potentials. , 1986, The International journal of neuroscience.

[18]  E. Donchin,et al.  Cognitive Psychophysiology and Human Information Processing , 1986 .