Scientific Thinking and Reasoning

Scientific thinking refers to the mental processes used when reasoning about the content of science (e.g., force in physics), engaged in typical scientific activities (e.g., designing experiments), or specific types of reasoning that are frequently used in science (e.g., deducing that there is a planet beyond Pluto). Scientific thinking involves many general-purpose cognitive operations that human beings apply in nonscientific domains such as induction, deduction, analogy, problem solving, and causal reasoning. These cognitive processes are covered in many chapters of this handbook (see Sloman & Lagnado, Chap. 5 on induction; Holyoak, Chap. 6 on analogy; Buehner and Cheng, Chap. 7 on causality; Evans, Chap. 8 on deduction; Novick and Bassok, Chap. 1 4 on problem solving; Chi and Ohllson, Chap. 16 on conceptual change). What distinguishes research on scientific thinking from general research on cognition is that research on scientific thinking typically involves investigating thinking that has scientific content. A number of overlapping research traditions have been used to investigate scientific thinking. We cover the history of research on scientific thinking and the different approaches that have been used, highlighting common themes that have emerged over the past fifty years of research.

[1]  L. McDermott,et al.  Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research , 1999 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. , 1974 .

[3]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  J. Grafman,et al.  Are the frontal lobes implicated in “planning” functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  P. Thagard,et al.  How Scientists Explain Disease , 1999 .

[6]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science , 1993 .

[7]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[8]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Jose P. Mestre,et al.  Learning and Instruction in Pre‐College Physical Science , 1991 .

[10]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[11]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[12]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[13]  Iris Tabak,et al.  BGuILE: Stragtegic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms , 2001 .

[14]  K. Dunbar,et al.  The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: the case of analogy , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Russell A Poldrack,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries and individual differences in visual concept learning as measured by functional MRI , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Models of Discovery , 1978 .

[17]  Pat Langley,et al.  The computational support of scientific discovery , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Theory and data interactions of the scientific mind: evidence from the molecular and the cognitive laboratory. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[19]  P. Langley,et al.  Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation , 1990 .

[20]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[21]  D. Klahr,et al.  When to trust the data: Further investigations of system error in a scientific reasoning task , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[22]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution , 1995, Cognition.

[23]  Milena K. Nigam,et al.  The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning , 2022 .

[24]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  On Scientific Thinking , 1981 .

[25]  James K. Kroger,et al.  Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: a parametric study of relational complexity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[27]  P. Thagard,et al.  Modelling Conceptual Revolutions , 1996, Dialogue.

[28]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  The problem of problem spaces: When and how to go beyond a 2-space model of scientific discovery , 1996 .

[29]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Psychology of science: A framework for the cognitive psychology of science , 1989 .

[30]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  The subjective side of science : Mitroff, Ian I., Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974, 329 pp., $11.50 , 1976 .

[31]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  The Rhythms of Scientific Thinking: A Study of Collaboration in an Earthquake Microworld , 2001 .

[32]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change , 1999 .

[33]  S. Stich,et al.  The cognitive basis of science , 2002 .

[34]  W. Bechtel,et al.  A companion to cognitive science , 1999 .

[35]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Experimental design heuristics for scientific discovery: the use of "baseline" and "known standard" controls , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Helmut Fischler,et al.  Modern physics and students' conceptions , 1992 .

[37]  John Stachel,et al.  Einstein's clocks, Poincaré's maps; Empires of time , 2005 .

[38]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[39]  P C Wason,et al.  Reasoning about a Rule , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Cognitive and AI models of reasoning , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Neuroanatomical Correlates of Human Reasoning , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Processes of Scientific Discovery: The Strategy of Experimentation , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  D. Gentner,et al.  The analogical mind : perspectives from cognitive science , 2001 .

[44]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  A 4-Space Model of Scientific Discovery , 1995 .

[45]  E. Heit Properties of inductive reasoning , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  Paul Erdös,et al.  Degree sequences in triangle-free graphs , 1991, Discret. Math..

[47]  M. Honda,et al.  Toward Neuroanatomical Models of Analogy: A Positron Emission Tomography Study of Analogical Mapping , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  K. Dunbar HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[49]  D. Osherson,et al.  Distinct brain loci in deductive versus probabilistic reasoning , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  N. Nersessian The Cognitive Basis of Science: The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science , 2002 .

[51]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[52]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Conceptual Change within and across Ontological Categories: Examples from Learning and Discovery in Science , 1992 .

[53]  R. Giere Cognitive Models of Science , 1992 .

[54]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  The Subjective Side of Science , 1969 .

[55]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Error, Falsification and Scientific Inference: An Experimental Investigation , 1989 .

[56]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Scientific discovery: compulalional explorations of the creative process , 1987 .

[57]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probability , 1993, Cognition.

[58]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Laboratory Replication of Scientific Discovery Processes , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  K. Dunbar,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Account of Frontal Lobe Function: Simulating Frontal Lobe Deficits in Normal Subjects a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Scientific discovery and technological innovation: ulcers, dinosaur extinction, and the programming language java , 1999 .

[61]  J. Clement Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[62]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Change: A Case Study of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .

[63]  H. Simon,et al.  Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings , 1999 .

[64]  S. Ian Robertson,et al.  Problem-solving , 2001, Human Thinking.

[65]  John R Anderson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of planning: A computational analysis using event-related fMRI , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  The Effects of Frontal Lobe Lesions on Goal Achievement in the Water Jug Task , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  Howard Greisdorf,et al.  Exploring Science: The Cognition and Development of Discovery Processes , 2003, J. Documentation.

[68]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  THE PROCESSES AND CHALLENGES OF CONCEPTUAL CHANGE , 2002 .

[69]  K. Dunbar How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[70]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  RL-PER1: Resource Letter on Physics Education Research. , 1999 .

[71]  K. Dunbar The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. , 2001 .

[72]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[73]  E. Keller Reflections on Gender and Science , 1985 .

[74]  L M Parsons,et al.  New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[75]  Raúl E. Valdés-Pérez,et al.  Conjecturing Hidden Entities by Means of Simplicity and Conservation Laws: Machine Discovery in Chemistry , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[76]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[77]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Causal thinking in science: How scientists and students interpret the unexpected , 2005 .

[78]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Anatomical Segregation of Component Processes in an Inductive Inference Task , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.