Temporal scale efficiency in DEA panel data estimations. An application to the solid waste disposal service in Spain

[1]  Barbara J Stevens,et al.  Scale, Market Structure, and the Cost of Refuse Collection , 1978 .

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  R. Willig,et al.  Economies of scope , 1981 .

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[5]  R. Banker Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis , 1984 .

[6]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air forces , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  R. Färe,et al.  Nonparametric Cost Approach to Scale Efficiency , 1985 .

[8]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  How Markets for Impure Public Goods Organize: The Case of Household Refuse Collection , 1987 .

[9]  J. Donahue The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means , 1991 .

[10]  Yolanda K. Kodrzycki Privatization of local public services: lessons for New England , 1994 .

[11]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[12]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  TESTING RESTRICTIONS IN NONPARAMETRIC EFFICIENCY MODELS , 2001 .

[13]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Model of hypercompetition , 2002, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[14]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Scale, Indivisibilities and Production Function in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2003 .

[15]  M. Warner,et al.  Rural—Urban Differences in Privatization: Limits to the Competitive State , 2003 .

[16]  Elbert Dijkgraaf,et al.  Cost Savings of Contracting Out Refuse Collection , 2005 .

[17]  B. Melenberg,et al.  Contracting out refuse collection , 2003 .

[18]  The survivor technique and the cost frontier: A nonparametric approach , 2004 .

[19]  G. Bel,et al.  Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? An Empirical Analysis on Privatization of Solid Waste Collection , 2004 .

[20]  N. Bosch,et al.  On the Relationship between Authority Size and the Costs of Providing Local Services: Lessons for the Design of Intergovernmental Transfers in Spain , 2005 .

[21]  Jati K. Sengupta Nonparametric efficiency analysis under uncertainty using data envelopment analysis , 2005 .

[22]  J. K. Sengupta Data envelopment analysis with heterogeneous data: an application , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[24]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Efficiency Models in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2006 .

[25]  Germà Bel,et al.  Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain , 2006 .

[26]  Xavier Fageda Sanjuan,et al.  Between privatization and intermunicipal cooperation: small municipalities, scale economics and transantion costs , 2006 .

[27]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Efficiency Models in Data Envelopment Analysis: Techniques of Evaluation of Productivity of Firms in a Growing Economy , 2006 .

[28]  Xavier Fageda,et al.  Why do local governments privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies , 2007 .

[29]  D. Prior,et al.  On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach , 2007 .

[30]  L. Simar,et al.  Nonparametric efficiency analysis: a multivariate conditional quantile approach , 2007 .

[31]  B. Dollery,et al.  Australian Local Government Amalgamation: A Conceptual Analysis of Population Size and Scale Economies in Municipal Service Provision , 2008 .

[32]  Mildred E. Warner,et al.  COMPETITION OR MONOPOLY? COMPARING PRIVATIZATION OF LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE US AND SPAIN , 2008 .

[33]  R. Zullo Does Fiscal Stress Induce Privatization? Correlates of Private and Intermunicipal Contracting, 1992–2002 , 2009 .

[34]  Germà Bel,et al.  Intermunicipal cooperation, privatization and waste management costs: evidence from rural municipalities. , 2009, Waste management.

[35]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  Removing the impact of environment with units-invariant efficient frontier analysis: An illustrative case study with intertemporal panel data☆ , 2009 .

[36]  R. Hulst,et al.  Institutional Shifts In Inter-Municipal Service Delivery , 2009 .

[37]  H. Tulkens La performance productive d’un service public. Définitions, méthodes de mesure et application à la Régie des Postes en Belgique , 2009 .

[38]  B. Dollery,et al.  Shared Services in Australian Local Government: Rationale, Alternative Models and Empirical Evidence , 2009 .

[39]  Francisco González-Gómez,et al.  Does Private Management of Water Supply Services Really Increase Prices? An Empirical Analysis in Spain , 2009 .

[40]  D. Prior,et al.  Output complexity, environmental conditions, and the efficiency of municipalities , 2010 .

[41]  Pedro Simões,et al.  Regulatory structures and operational environment in the Portuguese waste sector. , 2010, Waste management.

[42]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Influential observations in frontier models, a robust non-oriented approach to the water sector , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[43]  Bernardino Benito,et al.  Explaining differences in efficiency: an application to Spanish municipalities , 2010 .

[44]  J. Solana‐Ibáñez,et al.  Determinants of efficiency in the provision of municipal street-cleaning and refuse collection services. , 2011, Waste management.

[45]  Jorge Guardiola,et al.  WHY DO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS PRIVATIZE THE PROVISION OF WATER SERVICES? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SPAIN , 2011 .

[46]  R. Marques,et al.  Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector , 2011 .

[47]  Rita Martins,et al.  Water losses and hydrographical regions influence on the cost structure of the Portuguese water industry , 2012 .

[48]  P. Simões,et al.  The performance of private partners in the waste sector , 2012 .

[49]  Daniel Albalate,et al.  Governance and regulation of urban bus transportation: Using partial privatization to achieve the better of two worlds , 2012 .

[50]  The Market Structure of Urban Solid Waste Services: How Different Models Lead to Different Results , 2013 .

[51]  Jirí Hrebícek,et al.  Decision Support of Waste Management Expenditures Efficiency Assessment , 2013, ISESS.

[52]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: Recent Developments and Perspectives , 2013 .

[53]  E. Dijkgraaf,et al.  Cost advantage cooperations larger than private waste collectors , 2013 .

[54]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Non-parametric measurement of economies of scale and scope in non-competitive environment with price uncertainty , 2013 .

[55]  D. Prior,et al.  REDUCING COSTS IN TIMES OF CRISIS: DELIVERY FORMS IN SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS' WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES , 2013 .

[56]  D. Prior,et al.  Using Panel Data DEA to Measure CEOs’ Focus of Attention: An Application to the Study of Cognitive Group Membership and Performance , 2014 .

[57]  Xavier Fageda,et al.  Does Cooperation Reduce Service Delivery Costs? Evidence from Residential Solid Waste Services , 2014 .

[58]  T. Bovaird Efficiency in Third Sector Partnerships for Delivering Local Government Services: The role of economies of scale, scope and learning , 2014 .

[59]  F. González‐Gómez,et al.  Beyond the public–private controversy in urban water management in Spain , 2014 .

[60]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Neoclassical Characterization of Returns to Scale in Nonparametric Production Analysis , 2014 .

[61]  Miriam Hortas Rico,et al.  Determinación de la escala mínima eficiente en la provisión de bienes públicos locales. Evidencia para los municipios españoles , 2014 .

[62]  José Luis Zafra-Gómez,et al.  Alternative management structures for municipal waste collection services: the influence of economic and political factors. , 2014, Waste management.

[63]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Computing economies of vertical integration, economies of scope and economies of scale using partial frontier nonparametric methods , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[64]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Revisiting the determinants of local government performance , 2014 .

[65]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Economies of size and density in municipal solid waste recycling in Portugal , 2014 .

[66]  G. Bel,et al.  INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION AND COSTS: EXPECTATIONS AND EVIDENCE , 2015 .

[67]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Determining the optimal size of local government: the case of Tasmanian councils , 2015 .

[68]  Diego Prior,et al.  Cost efficiency in municipal solid waste service delivery. Alternative management forms in relation to local population size , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[69]  G. Pérez-López,et al.  Understanding the Dynamic Effect of Contracting Out on the Delivery of Local Public Services , 2016 .

[70]  B. Dollery,et al.  Did the Big Stick Work? An Empirical Assessment of Scale Economies and the Queensland Forced Amalgamation Program , 2016 .

[71]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Returns to scale and most productive scale size in DEA with negative data , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[72]  B. Dollery,et al.  No Aladdin’s Cave in New South Wales? Local Government Amalgamation, Scale Economies, and Data Envelopment Analysis Specification , 2017 .

[73]  J. Solana,et al.  Determinantes de la eficiencia en las fundaciones españolas , 2017 .

[74]  Katti Faceli,et al.  Technologies and decision support systems to aid solid-waste management: a systematic review. , 2017, Waste management.