Development of an emergy computation algorithm for complex systems using depth first search and track summing methods

Abstract Although emergy analysis provides a more comprehensive view of sustainability than other methods, it has been criticized from both theoretical and practical aspects due to its complicated approach, especially when dealing with large sized systems and allocating emergy involved with feedbacks or with input streams that have splits and co-products. The aim of this study was to provide a practical sustainability decision-making software tool to cover all the emergy rules by reformulating and improving previous emergy accounting procedures using the MATLAB language algorithm. The code consisted of the two components of (i) searching the emergy pathways, where the algorithm is adapted from the depth first search method, and (ii) the computation of emergy based on emergy algebra, where the track summing method was deployed. The algorithm was validated on three case studies, comprised of two complex systems with feedbacks, splits and co-products and one case of an industrial symbiosis with a closed loop of materials and energy through reuse and recycle. Three emergy size distribution behaviors (symbiosis, serial and parallel) were revealed and classification of the process behavior could be used to reduce the calculation complexity in further emergy applications.

[1]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  The problem of co-production in environmental accounting by emergy analysis , 2000 .

[2]  Pedro Benjumea,et al.  Exergy efficiency analysis of chemical and biochemical stages involved in liquid biofuels production processes , 2012 .

[3]  Mehmet Esen,et al.  Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse , 2013 .

[4]  Stephen E. Tennenbaum,et al.  Emergy and co-emergy , 2015 .

[5]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[6]  Ehsan Houshyar,et al.  Sustainability of wheat and maize production in the warm climate of southwestern Iran: an emergy analysis. , 2018 .

[7]  Ayhan Demirbas,et al.  Use of algae as biofuel sources. , 2010 .

[8]  M. T Brown,et al.  Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: a comparative view , 1996 .

[9]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  Emergy evaluation vs. life cycle-based embodied energy (solar, tidal and geothermal) of wood biomass resources. , 2014 .

[10]  Jay F. Martin,et al.  Life cycle and emergy based design of energy systems in developing countries: Centralized and localized options , 2015 .

[11]  O. L. Corre,et al.  Emergy paths computation from interconnected energy system diagram , 2015 .

[12]  Amin Kargarian,et al.  Diagonal Quadratic Approximation for Decentralized Collaborative TSO+DSO Optimal Power Flow , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Bin Chen,et al.  Urban energy–water nexus based on modified input–output analysis , 2017 .

[14]  Hanne Østergård,et al.  Development of concepts for human labour accounting in Emergy Assessment and other Environmental Sustainability Assessment methods , 2016 .

[15]  T. Hayat,et al.  Emergy evaluation for a low-carbon industrial park , 2017 .

[16]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  SCALE: Software for CALculating Emergy based on life cycle inventories , 2013 .

[17]  H. Odum.  4 – An Energy Circuit Language for Ecological and Social Systems: Its Physical Basis , 1972 .

[18]  Johann F. Görgens,et al.  Comparison of second-generation processes for the conversion of sugarcane bagasse to liquid biofuels in terms of energy efficiency, pinch point analysis and Life Cycle Analysis , 2015 .

[19]  H. Odum.  Biological circuits and the marine systems of Texas , 1967 .

[20]  Hai Ren,et al.  Methods for estimating the uncertainty in emergy table-form models , 2011 .

[21]  B. Bakshi,et al.  Promise and problems of emergy analysis , 2004 .

[22]  O. Le Corre,et al.  Exact computation of emergy based on a mathematical reinterpretation of the rules of emergy algebra , 2012 .

[23]  J. Dufour,et al.  Exergy analysis of synthetic biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading , 2015 .

[24]  Pornpote Piumsomboon,et al.  Environmental performance assessment of Napier grass for bioenergy production , 2017 .

[25]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms , 1972, SIAM J. Comput..

[26]  Z. A. Antonova,et al.  Exergy analysis of canola-based biodiesel production in Belarus , 2015 .

[27]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Exergetic analysis of the integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production from sugarcane , 2013 .

[28]  N. Amponsah,et al.  Sugarcane Biomass Production in South Florida: A Comparative Emergy Assessment of Organic Soil and Mineral Soil Production Systems , 2014 .

[29]  Haizhong An,et al.  Emergy network analysis of Chinese sectoral ecological sustainability , 2018 .

[30]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[31]  Nelson Martins,et al.  A review of emergy theory, its application and latest developments , 2016 .

[32]  Mahmoud-Reza Haghifam,et al.  Load management using multi-agent systems in smart distribution network , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[33]  Hai Ren,et al.  Emergy algebra: Improving matrix methods for calculating transformities , 2010 .

[34]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Cycling emergy: computing emergy in trophic networks , 2015 .

[35]  A. K. Singh,et al.  A novel hybrid approach to allocate renewable energy sources in distribution system , 2015 .

[36]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy assessment of global renewable sources , 2016 .

[37]  Hikmet Erbıyık,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources of Turkey and Assessment of Sustainability , 2015 .