Long‐term dynamics of bird diversity in forest and suburb: decay, turnover or homogenization?

Aim Urbanization and deforestation are important drivers of biodiversity change. However, long-term changes in faunal communities within urbanizing regions are poorly understood. We investigated how well observed community changes in both space and time agree with expectations based on current paradigms in urban ecology. Location Greater Brisbane region, Australia. Methods We compared bird assemblages in two time-periods 15 years apart, at multiple sites in remnant forest and residential suburbs across an urbanizing landscape. Differences in assemblage composition, species abundances and functional groupings were assessed within and between habitats. Results Compared with forest, suburbs in both time-periods had over twice the total bird abundance, a different species composition, greater between-site community similarity, a greater proportion of non-native species and greater dominance by large-bodied species. These differences corresponded with changes in sites whose habitat was converted from forest to suburb. Between time-periods, abundances of 58% of suburban species changed significantly compared with those of 11% in forest. Increaser species outnumbered decreasers in suburbs, with the reverse in forest. Abundance of small-bodied birds decreased 70% in suburbs and 20% in forest. Broad-spectrum competitors and nest predators were common among suburban increasers. Among invasive species, the number of increasers was counterbalanced by decreasers. Both site-scale species richness and between-site community similarity increased to a small extent in both habitats. Main conclusions Species composition and ecological function of suburban bird communities were very dynamic. Suburban assemblages were neither a subset of forest species nor an increasingly non-native compilation. Communities in large forest patches were comparatively stable. The notion of habitat-specific species turnover better characterizes the nature of most changes than either species decline or homogenization, even though both of these were evident. There is considerable scope for careful urban planning, focused on both among- and within-habitat variety, to sustain bird diversity in urbanizing landscapes.

[1]  J. Marzluff.  Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds , 2001 .

[2]  C. Catterall,et al.  A particular case and a general pattern: hyperaggressive behaviour by one species may mediate avifaunal decreases in fragmented Australian forests , 2003 .

[3]  A. Suarez,et al.  Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape , 2004 .

[4]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[5]  W. Wright,et al.  Bird declines over 22 years in forest remnants in southeastern Australia: Evidence of faunal relaxation? , 2006 .

[6]  Harry F. Recher,et al.  Why have birds in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined , 2001 .

[7]  C. Catterall.  Responses of faunal assemblages to urbanisation: global research paradigms and an avian case study , 2009 .

[8]  Henrique M. Pereira,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE RELATIVE VULNERABILITY OF SPECIES TO LAND-USE CHANGE , 2004 .

[9]  J. Olden,et al.  Biotic homogenization and conservation prioritization , 2007 .

[10]  A. Göth,et al.  Chick survival in the megapode Alectura lathami (Australian brush-turkey) , 2002 .

[11]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  How many birds are there in a city of half a million people? , 2009 .

[12]  Robert S. Hill,et al.  CHANGES IN SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES WITHIN THE ADELAIDE METROPOLITAN AREA, AUSTRALIA, 1836–2002 , 2005 .

[13]  J. Travis.  Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  John M. Marzluff,et al.  Importance of Reserve Size and Landscape Context to Urban Bird Conservation , 2004 .

[15]  R. Major,et al.  The influence of remnant bushland on the composition of suburban bird assemblages in Australia , 2003 .

[16]  J. Lockwood,et al.  Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  C. Catterall,et al.  Use of remnant forest habitat by birds during winter in subtropical Australia: patterns and processes , 1997 .

[18]  M. Soulé,et al.  Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system , 1999, Nature.

[19]  C. Catterall,et al.  BUSHLAND MODIFICATION AND STYLES OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT : THEIR EFFECTS ON BIRDS IN SOUTH-EAST QUEENSLAND , 1998 .

[20]  C. Catterall,et al.  Is the conservation value of small urban remnants of eucalypt forest limited by increased levels of nest predation? , 2006 .

[21]  M. Alberti,et al.  Predicting land cover change and avian community responses in rapidly urbanizing environments , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  R. Major,et al.  Nest predation in Australian urban environments and the role of the pied currawong, Strepera graculina , 1996 .

[23]  A. Bennett,et al.  Collapse of an avifauna: climate change appears to exacerbate habitat loss and degradation , 2009 .

[24]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization , 2006 .

[25]  J. Olden.  Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography , 2006 .

[26]  R. Blair,et al.  Suburban habitats and their role for birds in the urban–rural habitat network: points of local invasion and extinction? , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Bird densities are associated with household densities , 2007 .

[28]  C. Catterall,et al.  The Use of Bushland, Corridors, and Linear Remnants by Birds in Southeastern Queensland, Australia , 1997 .

[29]  John J. Walsh,et al.  Urban effects on native avifauna: a review , 2006 .

[30]  C. Catterall,et al.  Deforestation, urbanisation and seasonality: Interacting effects on a regional bird assemblage , 1998 .

[31]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Functional Homogenization Effect of Urbanization on Bird Communities , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  Avian species richness and numbers in the built environment: can new housing developments be good for birds? , 2006 .

[33]  S. Croci,et al.  Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: Analysis at different European latitudes , 2006 .

[34]  D. B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Functional Richness and Relative Resilience of Bird Communities in Regions with Different Land Use Intensities , 2007, Ecosystems.

[35]  Dn Jones,et al.  Australian Brush-turkeys in a Suburban Environment: Implications for Conflict and Conservation , 1991 .

[36]  R. Major,et al.  Species interactions and habitat associations of birds inhabiting urban areas of Sydney, Australia , 2006 .