Proof-of-concept: 3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs

Three-dimensional (3D) pigmented human skin constructs have been fabricated using a 3D bioprinting approach. The 3D pigmented human skin constructs are obtained from using three different types of skin cells (keratinocytes, melanocytes and fibroblasts from three different skin donors) and they exhibit similar constitutive pigmentation (pale pigmentation) as the skin donors. A two-step drop-on-demand bioprinting strategy facilitates the deposition of cell droplets to emulate the epidermal melanin units (pre-defined patterning of keratinocytes and melanocytes at the desired positions) and manipulation of the microenvironment to fabricate 3D biomimetic hierarchical porous structures found in native skin tissue. The 3D bioprinted pigmented skin constructs are compared to the pigmented skin constructs fabricated by conventional a manual-casting approach; in-depth characterization of both the 3D pigmented skin constructs has indicated that the 3D bioprinted skin constructs have a higher degree of resemblance to native skin tissue in term of the presence of well-developed stratified epidermal layers and the presence of a continuous layer of basement membrane proteins as compared to the manually-cast samples. The 3D bioprinting approach facilitates the development of 3D in vitro pigmented human skin constructs for potential toxicology testing and fundamental cell biology research.

[1]  Nancy L. Parenteau,et al.  The organotypic culture of human skin keratinocytes and fibroblasts to achieve form and function , 2006, Cytotechnology.

[2]  D. Cho,et al.  Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system , 2017, Biofabrication.

[3]  Jennifer H. Shin,et al.  Regulation of pigmentation by substrate elasticity in normal human melanocytes and melanotic MNT1 human melanoma cells , 2014, Experimental dermatology.

[4]  F. Bernerd,et al.  Human skin model containing melanocytes: essential role of keratinocyte growth factor for constitutive pigmentation-functional response to α-melanocyte stimulating hormone and forskolin. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[5]  May Win Naing,et al.  Polyelectrolyte gelatin-chitosan hydrogel optimized for 3D bioprinting in skin tissue engineering , 2016 .

[6]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Roles of support materials in 3D bioprinting - Present and future , 2017, International journal of bioprinting.

[7]  Amy Li,et al.  Establishment of 3D organotypic cultures using human neonatal epidermal cells , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[8]  J. Nordlund.  The melanocyte and the epidermal melanin unit: an expanded concept. , 2007, Dermatologic clinics.

[9]  D. Tobin,et al.  Biochemistry of human skin--our brain on the outside. , 2006, Chemical Society reviews.

[10]  Diego Velasco,et al.  3D bioprinting of functional human skin: production and in vivo analysis , 2016, Biofabrication.

[11]  Karl R Edminster,et al.  Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[12]  Dong-Woo Cho,et al.  Biofabrication: reappraising the definition of an evolving field , 2016, Biofabrication.

[13]  Jeung-Hoon Lee,et al.  Melanosome uptake is associated with the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes , 2013, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[14]  Wai Yee Yeong,et al.  Microvalve-based bioprinting - process, bio-inks and applications. , 2017, Biomaterials science.

[15]  A. Schambach,et al.  Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  Sheila MacNeil,et al.  Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin , 2007, Nature.

[17]  C. Delevoye.  Melanin transfer: the keratinocytes are more than gluttons. , 2014, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[18]  May Win Naing,et al.  Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Based Bio-Ink Improves Cell Viability and Homogeneity during Drop-On-Demand Printing , 2017, Materials.

[19]  S Vijayavenkataraman,et al.  3D bioprinting of skin: a state-of-the-art review on modelling, materials, and processes , 2016, Biofabrication.

[20]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Jiankang He,et al.  Electrohydrodynamic printing: a potential tool for high-resolution hydrogel/cell patterning , 2016 .

[22]  L. Griffith,et al.  Tissue Engineering--Current Challenges and Expanding Opportunities , 2002, Science.

[23]  Fatih Inci,et al.  Towards arti fi cial tissuemodels : past , present , and future of 3 D bioprinting , 2016 .

[24]  May Win Naing,et al.  Potential of Bioprinted Films for Skin Tissue Engineering , 2014 .

[25]  Yan Jin,et al.  Reconstruction of a tissue‐engineered skin containing melanocytes , 2007, Cell biology international.

[26]  D. Woodley,et al.  Methods for cultivation of keratinocytes with an air-liquid interface. , 1983, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[27]  Hyeong-Jin Lee,et al.  Recent cell printing systems for tissue engineering , 2017, International journal of bioprinting.

[28]  S. MacNeil,et al.  Fibroblasts play a regulatory role in the control of pigmentation in reconstructed human skin from skin types I and II. , 2002, Pigment cell research.

[29]  Pu Chen,et al.  Towards artificial tissue models: past, present, and future of 3D bioprinting , 2016, Biofabrication.

[30]  May Win Naing,et al.  Skin Bioprinting: Impending Reality or Fantasy? , 2016, Trends in biotechnology.

[31]  E. Lane,et al.  Making more matrix: enhancing the deposition of dermal-epidermal junction components in vitro and accelerating organotypic skin culture development, using macromolecular crowding. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[32]  May Win Naing,et al.  Microvalve bioprinting of cellular droplets with high resolution and consistency , 2016 .