Mapping longitudinal stream connectivity in the North St. Vrain Creek watershed of Colorado

Abstract We use reach-scale stream gradient as an indicator of longitudinal connectivity for water, sediment, and organic matter in a mountainous watershed in Colorado. Stream reaches with the highest gradient tend to have narrow valley bottoms with limited storage space and attenuation of downstream fluxes, whereas stream reaches with progressively lower gradients have progressively more storage and greater attenuation. We compared the distribution of stream gradient to stream-reach connectivity rankings that incorporated multiple potential control variables, including lithology, upland vegetation, hydroclimatology, road crossings, and flow diversions. We then assessed connectivity rankings using different weighting schemes against stream gradient and against field-based understanding of relative connectivity within the watershed. We conclude that stream gradient, which is simple to map using publicly available data and digital elevation models, is the most robust indicator of relative longitudinal connectivity within the river network.

[1]  E. Wohl.  Threshold-induced complex behavior of wood in mountain streams , 2011 .

[2]  R. Muneepeerakul,et al.  How restructuring river connectivity changes freshwater fish biodiversity and biogeography , 2011 .

[3]  G. Katul,et al.  Soil moisture and vegetation controls on evapotranspiration in a heterogeneous Mediterranean ecosystem on Sardinia, Italy , 2006 .

[4]  E. Wohl.  Mountain Rivers Revisited , 2010 .

[5]  Kirstie Fryirs,et al.  Channel–floodplain connectivity during an extreme flood event: implications for sediment erosion, deposition, and delivery , 2013 .

[6]  J. David Allan,et al.  Restoring aquatic ecosystem connectivity requires expanding inventories of both dams and road crossings , 2013 .

[7]  E. Wohl,et al.  CONTROLS ON THE LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION OF CHANNEL‐SPANNING LOGJAMS IN THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE, USA , 2014 .

[8]  S. Ryan,et al.  MORPHOLOGIC RESPONSE OF SUBALPINE STREAMS TO TRANSBASIN FLOW DIVERSION 1 , 1997 .

[9]  Wolfgang Schwanghart,et al.  Graph theory-recent developments of its application in geomorphology , 2014 .

[10]  Cherie J. Westbrook,et al.  Beaver dams and overbank floods influence groundwater–surface water interactions of a Rocky Mountain riparian area , 2006 .

[11]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins , 1997 .

[12]  Jason S. Sibold,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in historic fire regimes in subalpine forests across the Colorado Front Range in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA , 2006 .

[13]  E. Wohl,et al.  Neighborhood matters: Patterns and controls on wood distribution in old-growth forest streams of the Colorado Front Range, USA , 2011 .

[14]  C. Baxter,et al.  EFFECTS OF GEOMORPHIC PROCESS DOMAINS ON RIVER ECOSYSTEMS: A COMPARISON OF FLOODPLAIN AND CONFINED VALLEY SEGMENTS , 2014 .

[15]  K. Fryirs,et al.  Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework , 2005 .

[16]  Lorenzo Marchi,et al.  Geomorphometric assessment of spatial sediment connectivity in small Alpine catchments , 2013 .

[17]  E. Wohl.  A brief review of the process domain concept and its application to quantifying sediment dynamics in bedrock canyons , 2010 .

[18]  E. Wohl,et al.  Reach-scale channel geometry of mountain streams , 2008 .

[19]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Connectivity between landscapes and riverscapes—a unifying theme in integrating hydrology and ecology in catchment science? , 2007 .

[20]  Robert D. Jarrett,et al.  HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC RESEARCH IN MOUNTAIN RWERS , 1990 .

[21]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Reach‐scale channel geometry of a mountain river , 2004 .

[22]  D. Montgomery.  PROCESS DOMAINS AND THE RIVER CONTINUUM 1 , 1999 .

[23]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  FOREST ROADS AND GEOMORPHIC PROCESS INTERACTIONS, CASCADE RANGE, OREGON , 2001 .

[24]  J. Wainwright,et al.  Linking environmental régimes, space and time: Interpretations of structural and functional connectivity , 2008 .

[25]  John Wainwright,et al.  Sediment connectivity: a framework for understanding sediment transfer at multiple scales , 2015 .

[26]  John M. Buffington,et al.  Hyporheic Exchange in Mountain Rivers II: Effects of Channel Morphology on Mechanics, Scales, and Rates of Exchange , 2009 .

[27]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Geomorphic response of a headwater channel to augmented flow , 2012 .

[28]  J. Moody,et al.  Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range , 2001 .

[29]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Dynamic connectivity in a fluvial network for identifying hotspots of geomorphic change , 2015 .

[30]  J. Thornes,et al.  Landscape sensitivity and change , 1979 .

[31]  Stefan John,et al.  Hydrogeomorphic Effects of Beaver Dams on Floodplain Morphology: Avulsion Processes and sediment Fluxes in Upland Valley Floors (Spessart, Germany) , 2004 .

[32]  E. Wohl,et al.  Mechanisms of carbon storage in mountainous headwater rivers , 2012, Nature Communications.

[33]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach‐ and plot‐scale understanding to the catchment scale , 2009 .

[34]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Landscape scale linkages in critical zone evolution , 2012 .

[35]  E. Stanley,et al.  Process-Based Ecological River Restoration: Visualizing Three-Dimensional Connectivity and Dynamic Vectors to Recover Lost Linkages , 2006 .

[36]  R. Anderson,et al.  Unsteady late Pleistocene incision of streams bounding the Colorado Front Range from measurements of meteoric and in situ 10Be , 2012 .

[37]  C. A. Riihimaki,et al.  Facing reality: Late Cenozoic evolution of smooth peaks, glacially ornamented valleys, and deep river gorges of Colorado's Front Range , 2006 .

[38]  E. Wohl,et al.  An evaluation of stream characteristics in glacial versus fluvial process domains in the Colorado Front Range , 2015 .

[39]  E. Wohl,et al.  The beaver meadow complex revisited – the role of beavers in post‐glacial floodplain development , 2012 .

[40]  S. P. Anderson,et al.  Exhumation by debris flows in the 2013 Colorado Front Range storm , 2015 .

[41]  K. Fryirs,et al.  Catchment-scale (dis)connectivity in sediment flux in the upper Hunter catchment, New South Wales, Australia , 2007 .

[42]  J. C. Cole,et al.  Geologic map of Rocky Mountain National Park and vicinity, Colorado , 1990 .

[43]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Assessment of Stream Ecosystem Function and Sensitivity in the Bighorn National Forest, Wyoming , 2007, Environmental management.

[44]  E. Wohl,et al.  Geomorphic and process domain controls on riparian zones in the Colorado Front Range , 2011 .

[45]  Ellen Wohl,et al.  Leaky rivers: Implications of the loss of longitudinal fluvial disconnectivity in headwater streams , 2014 .

[46]  Arnaud J.A.M. Temme,et al.  Linking landscape morphological complexity and sediment connectivity , 2013 .

[47]  Gary Brierley,et al.  Landscape connectivity: the geographic basis of geomorphic applications , 2006 .

[48]  S. Schumm,et al.  Yield of sediment in relation to mean annual precipitation , 1958 .

[49]  Chris E. Jordan,et al.  Geomorphic changes upstream of beaver dams in Bridge Creek, an incised stream channel in the interior Columbia River basin, eastern Oregon , 2007 .

[50]  T. Heckmann,et al.  Geomorphic coupling and sediment connectivity in an alpine catchment - exploring sediment cascades using graph theory , 2013 .

[51]  E. Wohl,et al.  Using ground penetrating radar to 'unearth' buried beaver dams , 2012 .

[52]  Simon Mockler,et al.  Sediment concentration changes in runoff pathways from a forest road network and the resultant spatial pattern of catchment connectivity , 2005 .

[53]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Concepts of hydrological connectivity: Research approaches, pathways and future agendas , 2013 .

[54]  J. Wheaton,et al.  An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes , 2016 .