Evaluation of a condensation particle counter for vehicle emission measurement: Experimental procedure and effects of calibration aerosol material

A limit on particle number emission from the exhaust of Euro 5/6 engines will take effect in 2011 and engine exhaust particle number concentrations are required to be measured by particle number counters that meet requirements set forth by the UN/ECE particulate measurement programme (PMP). The TSI Model 3790 engine exhaust condensation particle counter (EECPC) was developed to meet these PMP requirements. This paper describes an experimental study that evaluated the performance of the EECPC. Experimental setup and procedures for calibrating EECPCs were evaluated. It was found that the EECPC counting efficiency strongly depended on the aerosol material. Among several materials tested, the counting efficiencies were highest for poly-α-olefin and lowest for sodium chloride. Errors in the concentration measurement due to the aerosol material dependence were estimated and found to be significant. Considerations for selecting aerosol materials for EECPC calibration are discussed with regard to best match with engine testing conditions.

[1]  Jon Andersson,et al.  Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) Light-Duty Inter-Laboratory Exercise: Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Particle Number Method , 2008 .

[2]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  Aerosol classification by electric mobility: apparatus, theory, and applications , 1975 .

[3]  R. W. Waytulonis,et al.  Chemical analysis of diesel engine nanoparticles using a nano-DMA/thermal desorption particle beam mass spectrometer. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  A. Wiedensohler,et al.  An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range , 1988 .

[5]  I. Riipinen,et al.  The condensation particle counter battery (CPCB): A new tool to investigate the activation properties of nanoparticles , 2007 .

[6]  S. Dahlén,et al.  Health effects of diesel exhaust emissions. , 2001, The European respiratory journal.

[7]  Ian M. Kennedy,et al.  The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols , 2007 .

[8]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  On-line measurements of diesel nanoparticle composition and volatility , 2003 .

[9]  M. Maricq Bipolar Diffusion Charging of Soot Aggregates , 2008 .

[10]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  An Ultrafine Aerosol Condensation Nucleus Counter , 1991 .

[11]  Barouch Giechaskiel,et al.  Calibration of Condensation Particle Counters for Legislated Vehicle Number Emission Measurements , 2009 .

[12]  Y. Goto,et al.  Thermal Conditioning of Exhaust Gas: Potential for Stabilizing Diesel Nano-Particles , 2005 .

[13]  Oliver F. Bischof,et al.  Calibration of Condensation Particle Counters , 2005 .

[14]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  PM Measurement Artifact: Organic Vapor Deposition on Different Filter Media , 2004 .

[15]  Jugal K. Agarwal,et al.  Continuous flow, single-particle-counting condensation nucleus counter , 1980 .

[16]  Jun Kagawa,et al.  Health effects of diesel exhaust emissions--a mixture of air pollutants of worldwide concern. , 2002, Toxicology.

[17]  H. G. Scheibel,et al.  Generation of monodisperse Ag- and NaCl-aerosols with particle diameters between 2 and 300 nm , 1983 .

[18]  H. Burtscher Physical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: a review , 2005 .

[19]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  A submicron aerosol standard and the primary, absolute calibration of the condensation nuclei counter , 1974 .

[20]  David Y. H. Pui,et al.  Electrospraying of conducting liquids for monodisperse aerosol generation in the 4 nm to 1.8 μm diameter range , 1995 .

[21]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[22]  N. Fuchs,et al.  On the stationary charge distribution on aerosol particles in a bipolar ionic atmosphere , 1963 .