When to choose which retention element to use for removable dental prostheses.

The aim of this article is to introduce criteria for planning treatment with a removable dental prosthesis (RDP) in a partially dentate arch, including the indications for placement of dental implants. The retention of RDPs is achieved through clasps, adhesive attachments, crowns, and fixed partial dentures with intra- or extracoronal attachments, telescopes, root caps, and/or prefabricated interradicular retainers. RDP designs vary from a removable partial denture to an overdenture prosthesis. Potential abutment teeth are selected for RDP retention according to their prognosis, their position in the arch, and the planned prosthesis design. Retainer selection mainly depends on the remaining tooth substance, the intra- and intermaxillary relationships, esthetics, and financial aspects. With dental implants as additional retainers, the supportive area for the RDP is increased, the soft tissue load is minimized, and the extension of the base of the prosthesis can be reduced to enhance a patient's comfort. For RDP planning, strategic considerations are needed to determine the appropriate prosthesis design, to select the abutment teeth, and to choose the appropriate retention element for each particular abutment.

[1]  S. Ganz,et al.  Combination natural tooth and implant-borne removable partial denture: a clinical report. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  C P Marinello,et al.  Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  A F Kayser,et al.  Distal extension removable partial dentures supported by implants and residual teeth: considerations and case reports. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  A. Buj-Bello,et al.  The glossary of prosthodontic terms. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  Keith M Phillips,et al.  Posterior implants for distal extension removable prostheses: a retrospective study. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[6]  P Schärer,et al.  A retrospective study of combined fixed-removable reconstructions with their analysis of failures. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[7]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Deflection fatigue of cobalt-chromium, titanium, and gold alloy cast denture clasp. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  F Ghani,et al.  A laboratory examination of the behaviour of cast cobalt-chromium clasps. , 1990, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[9]  P Schaerer,et al.  Tooth preparation in adhesive dentistry. , 1991, Dentistry today.

[10]  Nicola Ursula Zitzmann,et al.  A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible. , 2002, The International journal of prosthodontics.