(Current trend in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery in the Czech Republic)

Aims: Minimally invasive surgical approaches to aortic valve replacement are a popular compromise between standard replacement through median sternotomy and transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The aim of our study was to analyze the respective surgical approaches and their outcomes in the last fi ve years in the Czech Republic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all the isolated surgical aortic valve replacements performed in the Czech Republic between 2015 and 2019 from the aspect of surgical approach. For this purpose, we took the cohort data from National Registry of Cardiovascular Surgeries and Interventions. We assessed the size of the cohorts and the early perioperative mortality in all the cohorts in time as well as the early perioperative outcomes. Results: There is a rising tendency in time towards choosing the minimally invasive approach to aortic valve replacement. In 2019, 287 patients (37.5%) were operated in a minimally invasive manner (27.6% through partial sternotomy, 9.3% through thoracotomy, conversion was required in 0.6%) while preserving stable low mortality and risk of conversion. Minimally invasive cohorts had shorter operation times, shorter artifi cial ventilation time, and intensive care unit stay. They had lower blood loss, lower need for transfusion, lower risk of conversion and wound infection. However, they had low risk profi le according to EuroSCORE II. Conclusion: In the Czech Republic, there is a favorable trend towards rising use of minimally invasive approaches to isolated aortic valve replacement while preserving stable low mortality. The patients have low risk of complications and the recovery is fast. Minimally invasive approaches to aortic valve replacement should be generally preferred as far as there are no severe contraindications. Klíčová slova: Miniinvazivní kardiochirurgie Náhrada aortální chlopně Parciální sternotomie Torakotomie

[1]  A. Markewitz,et al.  German Heart Surgery Report 2018: The Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery , 2019, The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon.

[2]  C. Young,et al.  Outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  G. I. Salagaev,et al.  [Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement]. , 2017, Khirurgiia.

[4]  M. Thielmann,et al.  Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies. , 2017, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[5]  S. Malaisrie,et al.  Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  J. Lucet,et al.  Sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors according to clinical presentation. , 2015, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[7]  P. Erwin,et al.  Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Pooled Analysis of Propensity‐Matched Data , 2015, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[8]  K. Phan,et al.  Ministernotomy or minithoracotomy for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. , 2015, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[9]  Evagoras Nikolaides,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Is it Time for This Intervention to be Applied in a Lower Risk Population? , 2014, Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology.

[10]  T. Mihaljevic,et al.  Should less-invasive aortic valve replacement be avoided in patients with pulmonary dysfunction? , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  M. Amrani,et al.  Aortic valve replacement through J-shaped partial upper sternotomy. , 2013, Journal of thoracic disease.

[12]  M. Desai,et al.  Pre-operative 3D CT imaging for virtual planning of minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  J. Kinsella,et al.  Mini-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement reduces the length of stay in the cardiac intensive care unit: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2011, BMJ Open.

[14]  T. Koh,et al.  Percutaneous transcatheter heart valve implantation in a bicuspid aortic valve. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  Ghassan Sleilaty,et al.  Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? Results from a human anatomic study in adults. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Dominik Chirurgie srdečních chlopní : (--nejen pro kardiochirurgy) : ve 200 vyobrazeních. , 2008 .

[18]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. , 2003, European heart journal.

[19]  Bonnie K. Lind,et al.  Association of aortic-valve sclerosis with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in the elderly. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  L. Svensson,et al.  Minimal-access "J" or "j" sternotomy for valvular, aortic, and coronary operations or reoperations. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.