Experience-Dependent Brain Development as a Key to Understanding the Language System

An influential view of the nature of the language system is that of an evolved biological system in which a set of rules is combined with a lexicon that contains the words of the language together with a representation of their context. Alternative views, usually based on connectionist modeling, attempt to explain the structure of language on the basis of complex associative processes. Here, I put forward a third view that stresses experience-dependent structural development of the brain circuits supporting language as a core principle of the organization of the language system. In this view, embodied in a recent neuroconstructivist neural network of past tense development and processing, initial domain-general predispositions enable the development of functionally specialized brain structures through interactions between experience-dependent brain development and statistical learning in a structured environment. Together, these processes shape a biological adult language system that appears to separate into distinct mechanism for processing rules and exceptions, whereas in reality those subsystems co-develop and interact closely. This view puts experience-dependent brain development in response to a specific language environment at the heart of understanding not only language development but adult language processing as well.

[1]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Chapter 28. Neuroconstructivism , 2010 .

[2]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[3]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of English past tense and plural morphology , 1999 .

[4]  Gert Westermann,et al.  A neuroconstructivist model of past tense development and processing. , 2012, Psychological review.

[5]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought , 2006 .

[6]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neurolinguistics: Structural plasticity in the bilingual brain , 2004, Nature.

[7]  S. Jaeger ON THE COMPLEXITY OF COGNITION , 2004 .

[8]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  fMRI of Past Tense Processing: The Effects of Phonological Complexity and Task Difficulty , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Do cortical areas emerge from a protocortex? , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Irresistible environment meets immovable neurons , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociations in Processing Past Tense Morphology: Neuropathology and Behavioral Studies , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[13]  John Ashburner,et al.  Structural plasticity in the bilingual brain: Proficiency in a second language and age at acquisition affect grey-matter density. , 2004 .

[14]  W. Greenough,et al.  Experience and brain development. , 1987, Child development.

[15]  M. Ullman Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.

[16]  Halbert White,et al.  Connectionist nonparametric regression: Multilayer feedforward networks can learn arbitrary mappings , 1990, Neural Networks.

[17]  S. Pinker,et al.  The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  G. Gottlieb Probabilistic epigenesis. , 2007, Developmental science.

[20]  A. Ronald,et al.  A simulated twin study exploring the heritability of past tense acquisition in a population of neural network models , 2008 .

[21]  Denise C Park,et al.  Culture sculpts the perceptual brain. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[22]  Eric B. Baum,et al.  A Proposal for More Powerful Learning Algorithms , 1989, Neural Computation.

[23]  S Pinker,et al.  Rules of language. , 1991, Science.

[24]  H. Clahsen,et al.  Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  S. Quartz Neural networks, nativism, and the plausibility of constructivism , 1993, Cognition.

[26]  Mark H. Johnson The neural basis of cognitive development. , 1998 .

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[28]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Mapping the mind: Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization , 1994 .

[29]  Michael W. Spratling,et al.  Neuroconstructivism - I: How the Brain Constructs Cognition , 2007 .

[30]  Mark H. Johnson The Human Social Brain: An “Evo-Devo” Perspective , 2009 .

[31]  J. Shonkoff,et al.  Development of infants with disabilities and their families: implications for theory and service delivery. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[32]  D. Swinney,et al.  Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia , 2005, Brain and Language.

[33]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What's the connection? , 2003 .

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  H. Barrett,et al.  Modularity in cognition: framing the debate. , 2006, Psychological review.

[36]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  German Inflection: The Exception That Proves the Rule , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Modularity, Development and ‘Theory of Mind’ , 1999 .

[38]  Marko Becker,et al.  The Architecture Of The Mind , 2016 .

[39]  J. Jaeger A POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHIC STUDY OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR VERB MORPHOLOGY IN ENGLISH , 1996 .

[40]  Patrick Juola,et al.  A connectionist model of english past tense and plural morphology , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  S. Pinker,et al.  Beyond one model per phenomenon , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  John A. Bullinaria,et al.  Understanding the Emergence of Modularity in Neural Systems , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns , 1993 .

[44]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[45]  S. Pinker,et al.  A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  R. Lickliter,et al.  Developmental dynamics: toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  S. Pinker Words and rules in the human brain , 1997, Nature.

[48]  D. Moore The Developing Genome: An Introduction to Behavioral Epigenetics , 2015 .

[49]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[51]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[52]  K. Amunts,et al.  Localized morphological brain differences between English-speaking Caucasians and Chinese-speaking Asians: new evidence of anatomical plasticity , 2003, Neuroreport.

[53]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Imaging the past: Neural activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[54]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Quasiregularity and Its Discontents: The Legacy of the Past Tense Debate , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  H. Burton Visual Cortex Activity in Early and Late Blind People , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  G. Westermann,et al.  Connectionist approaches to language learning , 2009 .

[57]  Ayse K. Uskul,et al.  Culture, mind, and the brain: current evidence and future directions. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[58]  T. Shultz Computational Developmental Psychology , 2003 .

[59]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  David S. Touretzky,et al.  Connectionist Approaches to Language Learning , 1991 .

[61]  Virginia A. Marchman,et al.  Children's Productivity in the English Past Tense: The Role of Frequency, Phonology, and Neighborhood Structure , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[62]  S. Quartz The constructivist brain , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  G. Westermann,et al.  Synthetic Brain Imaging of English Past Tense Inflection , 2009 .

[64]  Magnus Lindgren,et al.  Growth of language-related brain areas after foreign language learning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[65]  Mark H. Johnson Interactive Specialization: A domain-general framework for human functional brain development? , 2011, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[66]  Thomas Witzel,et al.  Spatiotemporal maps of past-tense verb inflection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[67]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Dissociating types of mental computation , 1997, Nature.

[68]  T. Shultz,et al.  Modeling developmental cognitive neuroscience , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  David Haussler,et al.  What Size Net Gives Valid Generalization? , 1989, Neural Computation.

[70]  E. Mark Gold,et al.  Language Identification in the Limit , 1967, Inf. Control..

[71]  Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah,et al.  Are regular and irregular verbs dissociated in non-fluent aphasia? A meta-analysis , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.