Elementary School Students' Perceptions of the New Science and Technology Curriculum by Gender

The purpose of this study is to explore students’ perceptions of science and technology classes by gender in a Turkish elementary school context. Data for the study were collected through a 20-item, five-point Likert scale from a total of 1558 sixth-grade students at 20 different elementary schools in Turkey. The independent groups’ t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the data. Statistically significant differences were observed in the gender of the students. Male students considered learning science and technology more necessary and important than female students did. They also found learning environment and teaching strategies more sufficient and effective than females did. Findings revealed that male students were not satisfied with what the teachers practised in science classrooms. Additionally, some useful implications are discussed based on the research findings to construct and conduct science and technology classes effectively.

[1]  J. E. Stake,et al.  Science Enrichment Programs for Gifted High School Girls and Boys: Predictors of Program Impact on Science Confidence and Motivation. , 2001 .

[2]  B. Fraser,et al.  Effects of classroom environment on science attitudes: A cross‐cultural replication in Indonesia‡ , 1987 .

[3]  Ricardo Trumper,et al.  Factors Affecting Junior High School Students' Interest in Physics , 2006 .

[4]  Mary Crawford,et al.  Gender and Thought: Psychological Perspectives , 1989 .

[5]  B. Shwalb,et al.  Competitive and Cooperative Attitudes: A Longitudinal Survey of Japanese Adolescents , 1995 .

[6]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[7]  John B. Lyons,et al.  The Learning Environment: Do School Facilities Really Affect a Child's Education?. , 2002 .

[8]  J. Steve Oliver,et al.  Attitude toward Science and Achievement Motivation Profiles of Male and Female Science Students in Grades Six through Ten. , 1985 .

[9]  Secondary Education. Office for Career.  Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework , 2006 .

[10]  H. Güvenç,et al.  The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Concept Mapping on Learning Strategy Use. , 2007 .

[11]  Sinan Olkun,et al.  Program development models and reform in Turkish Primary School Mathematics curriculum , 2006 .

[12]  Jane Butler Kahle,et al.  The Disadvantaged Majority: Science Education for Women. AETS Outstanding Paper for 1983. , 1983 .

[13]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  Collaborative learning: Its impact on college students' development and diversity , 2002 .

[14]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Bringing Young Women to Math and Science , 1989 .

[15]  K. L. Yanowitz,et al.  Assessing Girls' Reactions to Science Workshops , 2004 .

[16]  Ronald D. Simpson,et al.  Relationships of Attitude toward Classroom Environment with Attitude toward and Achievement in Science among Tenth Grade Biology Students. , 1987 .

[17]  John C. Williamson,et al.  Use of classroom and school climate scales in evaluating alternative high schools , 1987 .

[18]  H. Emmett Brown,et al.  Association for the education of teachers in science , 1957 .

[19]  Kathleen Holt,et al.  A Pattern Analysis of Students' Achievement Goals. , 1993 .

[20]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Classroom Environment Instruments: Development, Validity and Applications , 1998 .

[21]  Linda J. Sax,et al.  PREDICTING GENDER AND MAJOR-FIELD DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICAL SELF-CONCEPT DURING COLLEGE , 1994 .

[22]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Students' perceptions about science: The impact of transition from primary to secondary school , 1996 .

[23]  Sandra Johnson.  Gender differences in science: parallels in interest, experience and performance , 1987 .

[24]  M. Stanisstreet,et al.  Undergraduates' views about biology and physics , 2003 .

[25]  E. Allen Bame,et al.  Pupils' Attitudes toward Technology--PATT-USA. , 1993 .

[26]  T. A. Greenfield.  Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest and participation , 1997 .

[27]  J. Jovanovic,et al.  Boys and Girls in the Performance-Based Science Classroom: Who’s Doing the Performing? , 1998 .

[28]  James H. Stronge,et al.  Qualities of Effective Teachers , 2002 .

[29]  Peter Labudde,et al.  Girls and physics: teaching and learning strategies tested by classroom interventions in grade 11 , 2000 .

[30]  Teresa Arámbula Greenfield,et al.  Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes , 1996 .

[31]  C. Dawson,et al.  Upper primary boys' and girls' interests in science: have they changed since 1980? , 2000 .

[32]  Ej Wood.  European journal of science education , 1979 .

[33]  P. Otto.  One Science, One Sex? , 1991 .

[34]  Richard W. Morshead.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: Affective Domain , 1965 .

[35]  D. Dai.  To Be or Not to Be (Challenged), That Is the Question: Task and Ego Orientations Among High-Ability, High-Achieving Adolescents , 2000 .

[36]  Betsy Jane Becker,et al.  Gender and Science Achievement: A Reanalysis of Studies from Two Meta-Analyses. , 1989 .

[37]  Sophia Catsambis,et al.  Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades , 1995 .

[38]  C. Norman.  Math education: a mixed picture. , 1988, Science.

[39]  M. Lundeberg,et al.  Highly Confident, but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments. , 1994 .

[40]  Robert K. James,et al.  Alienation of students from science in grades 4–12 , 1985 .

[41]  Michael D. Piburn,et al.  Sex differences in formal reasoning ability: Task and interviewer effects , 1989 .

[42]  R. Straton,et al.  The Development of a Co-Operative, Competitive, and Individualised Learning Preference Scale for Students. , 1980 .

[43]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  What students say about science teaching, science teachers and science classes in Israel and the U.S. , 1986 .

[44]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Gender effects for student perception of the classroom psychosocial environment , 1987 .

[45]  R. Felder.  Reaching the Second Tier--Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. , 1993 .

[46]  B. Collis,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparison of Gender Differences in Adolescents’ Attitudes Toward Computers and Selected School Subjects , 1987 .

[47]  Jh Jan Raat,et al.  What Do 13-Year Old Pupils Think about Technology? The Conception of and the Attitude towards Technology of 13-Year Old Girls and Boys. , 1985 .

[48]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[49]  Robert E. Yager,et al.  Changes in Perceptions of Science for Third, Seventh, and Eleventh Grade Students. , 1985 .

[50]  Jeffry V. Mallow,et al.  Science Anxiety and Gender in Students Taking General Education Science Courses , 2004 .

[51]  M. Linn,et al.  Gender, Mathematics, and Science , 1989 .

[52]  Meryem Yilmaz-Soylu,et al.  The Effect of Learning Styles on Achievement in Different Learning Environments. , 2009 .

[53]  R. Felder,et al.  Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles* , 2005 .

[54]  Timothy P. Scott,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of National Research: Effects of Teaching Strategies on Student Achievement in Science in the United States , 2007 .

[55]  K. Mandroukas,et al.  Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[56]  G. Erickson,et al.  Females and Science Achievement: Evidence, Explanations, and Implications. , 1984 .

[57]  Jane Butler Kahle,et al.  The myth of equality in science classrooms , 1983 .

[58]  E. Ojofeitimi,et al.  Science Education in Nigeria: An Examination of People’s Perceptions about Female Participation in Science, Mathematics and Technology , 2006 .

[59]  P. Prokop,et al.  Slovakian Students' Attitudes toward Biology , 2007 .

[60]  L. Francis,et al.  Attitude Toward Science among Secondary School Pupils in Northern Ireland: relationship with sex, age and religion , 1999 .

[61]  Maria M. Ferreira.  Gender issues related to graduate student attrition in two science departments , 2003 .

[62]  Shwu-Yong L. Huang,et al.  Classroom Learning Environments in Urban Elementary, Middle, and High Schools , 1998 .

[63]  Sandra Johnson,et al.  The underachievement of girls in physics: Towards explanations , 1984 .

[64]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[65]  Molly H. Weinburgh,et al.  Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta‐analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991 , 1995 .

[66]  Gaalen Erickson,et al.  Prior Experience and Gender Differences in Science Achievement. , 1991 .

[67]  Michael P. Freedman.  Relationship among Laboratory Instruction, Attitude toward Science, and Achievement in Science Knowledge. , 1997 .

[68]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Cognitive Flexibility, Constructivism, and Hypertext: Random Access Instruction for Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains , 2012 .

[69]  Renato Schibeci,et al.  Attitudes to Science: an update , 1984 .

[70]  Pamela J. Garnett,et al.  Gender Related Differences in Science Activities. , 1987 .

[71]  Educational Assessment's Lurking Lacuna , 1994 .

[72]  David T. Burkam,et al.  Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis , 1996 .

[73]  David T. Burkam,et al.  Gender and Science Learning Early in High School: Subject Matter and Laboratory Experiences , 1997 .

[74]  S. Walker,et al.  Teaching, Training and Learning: A Practical Guide , 1994 .

[75]  Robert A. Ellis,et al.  University student approaches to learning science through writing , 2004 .

[76]  Ning Ding,et al.  How Partner Gender Influences Female Students’ Problem Solving in Physics Education , 2006 .

[77]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists , 2000 .

[78]  Richard A. Boser,et al.  Students' Attitudes toward Technology in Selected Technology Education Programs. , 1998 .