How it works: a field study of non-technical users interacting with an intelligent system

In order to develop intelligent systems that attain the trust of their users, it is important to understand how users perceive such systems and develop those perceptions over time. We present an investigation into how users come to understand an intelligent system as they use it in their daily work. During a six-week field study, we interviewed eight office workers regarding the operation of a system that predicted their managers' interruptibility, comparing their mental models to the actual system model. Our results show that by the end of the study, participants were able to discount some of their initial misconceptions about what information the system used for reasoning about interruptibility. However, the overarching structures of their mental models stayed relatively stable over the course of the study. Lastly, we found that participants were able to give lay descriptions attributing simple machine learning concepts to the system despite their lack of technical knowledge. Our findings suggest an appropriate level of feedback for user interfaces of intelligent systems, provide a baseline level of complexity for user understanding, and highlight the challenges of making users aware of sensed inputs for such systems.

[1]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Transparent Queries: investigation users' mental models of search engines , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[2]  Hilary Johnson,et al.  Explanation facilities and interactive systems , 1993, IUI '93.

[3]  John Riedl,et al.  Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations , 2000, CSCW '00.

[4]  James Fogarty,et al.  Toolkit support for developing and deploying sensor-based statistical models of human situations , 2007, CHI.

[5]  Neville Moray Intelligent Aids, Mental Models, and the Theory of Machines , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[6]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[7]  B. Johnson Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2002 .

[8]  G F Cooper,et al.  An evaluation of explanations of probabilistic inference. , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[9]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Two Theories of Home Heat Control , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Regina A. Pomranky,et al.  The role of trust in automation reliance , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Christine L. Borgman The User's Mental Model of an Information Retrieval System: An Experiment on a Prototype Online Catalog , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[12]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust in automation. I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems , 1994 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[14]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The user's mental model of an information retrieval system , 1999, SIGIR '85.

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[16]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Some observations on mental models , 1987 .

[17]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[18]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Compelling intelligent user interfaces—how much AI? , 1997, IUI '97.

[19]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: Two theories of home heat control , 1987 .

[20]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[21]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Accounting for system behavior: representation, reflection, and resourceful action , 1997 .

[22]  BellottiVictoria,et al.  Intelligibility and accountability , 2001 .

[23]  James Fogarty,et al.  Examining the robustness of sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility , 2004, CHI.

[24]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Towards improving trust in context-aware systems by displaying system confidence , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[25]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[26]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..