A Study of the Effects of Score Normalisation Prior to Fusion in Biometric Authentication Tasks

Although the subject of fusion is well studied, the effects of normalisation prior to fusion are somewhat less well investigated. In this study, four normalisation techniques and six commonly used fusion classifiers were examined. Based on 24 (fusion classifiers) as a result of pairing the normalisation techniques and classifiers applied on 32 fusion data sets, 4x6x32 means 768 fusion experiments were carried out on the XM2VTS score-level fusion benchmark database, it can be concluded that trainable fusion classifiers are potentially useful. It is found that some classifiers are very sensitive (in terms of Half Total Error Rate) to normalisation techniques such as Weighted sum with weights optimised using Fisher-ratio and Decision Template. The mean fusion operator and user-specific linear weight combination are relative less sensitive. It is also found that Support Vector Machines and Gaussian Mixture Model are the least sensitive to different normalisation techniques, while achieving the best generalisation performance. For these two techniques, score normalisation is unnecessary prior to fusion.

[1]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Decision Combination in Multiple Classifier Systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Arun Ross,et al.  Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Gérard Chollet,et al.  Multi-modal identity verification using expert fusion , 2000, Inf. Fusion.

[4]  Alvin F. Martin,et al.  The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[5]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[6]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  H. Chandler Database , 1985 .

[8]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Combining evidence in personal identity verification systems , 1997, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[9]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[10]  Samy Bengio,et al.  A statistical significance test for person authentication , 2004, Odyssey.

[11]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[12]  Samy Bengio,et al.  The expected performance curve: a new assessment measure for person authentication , 2004, Odyssey.

[13]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Evaluation of Biometric Technology on XM2VTS , 2001 .

[14]  Arun Ross,et al.  Learning user-specific parameters in a multibiometric system , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[15]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Database, protocols and tools for evaluating score-level fusion algorithms in biometric authentication , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Improving Fusion with Margin-Derived Confidence in Biometric Authentication Tasks , 2005, AVBPA.

[17]  Cheng-Lin Liu,et al.  Classifier combination based on confidence transformation , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Mübeccel Demirekler,et al.  Why does output normalization create problems in multiple classifier systems? , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[19]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Fusion Strategies for Multimodal Biometric Verification , 2003, AVBPA.