An Empirical Investigation of the Intuitiveness of Process Landscape Designs

Process landscapes define the scope and relationships between an organization’s business processes and are therefore essential for their management. However, in contrast to business process diagrams, where nowadays BPMN prevails, process landscape diagrams lack standardization, which results in numerous process landscape designs. Accordingly, our goal was to investigate how intuitive are current landscape designs to users with low expertise, as well as users having expertise in BPMN and landscape modeling. A total of 302 subjects participated in the research showing that previous expertise impacts the interpretation of landscape elements and designs whereas, in the case of having contextual information, subjects responded more consistently. The results also show that the basic relationships between processes are intuitive to users, also in the case when only proximity between shapes is facilitated. Our findings may imply future designs of languages for process landscapes. They also may be useful for those who actually model process landscape diagrams and search for suitable notations.

[1]  John S. McClure Semiotics: The Basics , 2004 .

[2]  Jan Mendling,et al.  An Explorative Study for Process Map Design , 2014, CAiSE Forum.

[3]  Keng Siau,et al.  Informational and Computational Equivalence in Comparing Information Modeling Methods , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[4]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  The Complete Business Process Handbook: Body of Knowledge from Process Modeling to BPM, Volume I , 2014 .

[5]  R. Burke Johnson,et al.  Research Methods Design and Analysis , 2010 .

[6]  Daniel Chandler,et al.  Semiotics: The Basics , 2001 .

[7]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Business Process Management in Public Administrations - The PICTRUE Approach , 2007, PACIS.

[8]  Michael zur Muehlen,et al.  Service Process Innovation: A Case Study of BPMN in Practice , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[9]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[10]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  The Road to a Business Process Architecture: An Overview of Approaches and their Use , 2011 .

[11]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Luise Pufahl,et al.  A Landscape for Case Models , 2019, BPMDS/EMMSAD@CAiSE.

[13]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Why is BPMN not appropriate for Process Maps? , 2015, ICIS.

[14]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Business Process Architecture: Use and Correctness , 2012, BPM.

[15]  Maja Pusnik,et al.  A Case-Based Analysis of Process Modeling for Public Administration System Design , 2019, EJC.

[16]  Sara Jones,et al.  Evaluating the Intelligibility of Diagrammatic Languages Used in the Specification of Software , 2000, Diagrams.

[17]  Jan Recker,et al.  Continued use of process modeling grammars: the impact of individual difference factors , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Geert Poels,et al.  Architecting business process maps , 2020, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Dieter Van Nuffel,et al.  Multi-abstraction layered business process modeling , 2012, Comput. Ind..

[20]  Veronika Stefanov,et al.  Bridging the gap between data warehouses and business processes: a business intelligence perspective for event-driven process chains , 2005, Ninth IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC'05).

[21]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures , 2007 .

[23]  Marian Petre,et al.  Why looking isn't always seeing: readership skills and graphical programming , 1995, CACM.

[24]  Pavel Hruby,et al.  Structuring Specification of Business Systems with UML (with an Emphasis on Workflow Management Systems) , 1998 .

[25]  Fernanda Gonzalez-Lopez,et al.  Business process architecture design methodologies - a literature review , 2019, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[26]  Patrick Heymans,et al.  Visual notation design 2.0: Towards user comprehensible requirements engineering notations , 2013, 2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE).

[27]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Business process architectures: overview, comparison and framework , 2016, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Dina Neiger,et al.  Business Process Modelling with EPCs , 2009 .

[29]  Sara Jones,et al.  The Untrained Eye: How Languages for Software Specification Support Understanding in Untrained Users , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..