The role of computer modelling in participatory integrated assessments

Abstract In a number of recent research projects, computer models have been included in participatory procedures to assess global environmental change. The intention was to support knowledge production and to help the involved non-scientists to develop a deeper understanding of the interactions between natural and social systems. This paper analyses the experiences made in three projects with the use of computer models from a participatory and a risk management perspective. Our cross-cutting analysis of the objectives, the employed project designs and moderation schemes and the observed learning processes in participatory processes with model use shows that models play a mixed role in informing participants and stimulating discussions. However, no deeper reflection on values and belief systems could be achieved. In terms of the risk management phases, computer models serve best the purposes of problem definition and option assessment within participatory integrated assessment (PIA) processes.

[1]  Bert Metz,et al.  Climate OptiOns for the Long term (COOL) - GlobalDialogue Synthesis Report , 2002 .

[2]  J. Rotmans.  Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead , 1998 .

[3]  L. Hordijk,et al.  Climate Options for the Long Term (COOL) , 1999 .

[4]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[5]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The personal CO2 calculator: A modeling tool for Participatory Integrated Assessment methods , 1999 .

[6]  Terry Shinn,et al.  The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge , 2002 .

[7]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[8]  Au.  Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain , 2001 .

[9]  Carlo Jaeger,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science. , 2003 .

[10]  C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 1983 .

[11]  Nicole Rijkens-Klomp,et al.  A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective , 2002 .

[12]  John Forrester,et al.  The logistics of public participation in environmental assessment , 1999 .

[13]  Leen Hordijk,et al.  Using Computer Models in International Negotiations: The Case of Acidification in Europe , 1999 .

[14]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis , 2001 .

[15]  B. D. Vries,et al.  Perspectives on global change : the TARGETS approach , 1997 .

[16]  T. Jahn,et al.  Sustainability and the social sciences : a cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation , 1999 .

[17]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Spatially integrated social science , 2004 .

[18]  M. F. van de Kerkhof.  Debating Climate Change. A study of stakeholder participation in an integrated assessment of long-term climate policy in the Netherlands , 2004 .

[19]  Marjolein B.A. van Asselt,et al.  Integrated assessment of sustainable development: multiple perspectives in interaction , 1999 .

[20]  M. G. Morgan,et al.  Integrated assessment of climate change. , 1993, Science.

[21]  Greef J de,et al.  Global Change and Sustainable Development. A modelling perspective for the next decade , 1994 .

[22]  J. Barnett,et al.  Sustainability And The Social Sciences: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach To Integrating Environmental Considerations Into Theoretical Reorientation. Edited by Egon Becker and Thomas Jahn, London and New York: Zed Books (1999). Reviewed by Jon Barnett , 2000 .

[23]  Ferenc L. Toth,et al.  Integrated environmental assessment methods: Evolution and applications , 1998 .

[24]  J. Ravetz,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Models as metaphors , 2003 .

[25]  Marleen van de Kerkhof,et al.  Shaping Diversity in Participatory Foresight Studies , 2002 .

[26]  Suzan Dagg,et al.  Book Review: Public Participation in Sustainability Science — A Handbook, Bernd Kasemir, Jill Jäger, Carlo Jaeger and Matthew T. Gardner (Eds.) , 2003 .

[27]  Pier Vellinga,et al.  Debating Climate Change , 1999 .

[28]  Henricus Bernardus Maria Hilderink,et al.  World Population in Transition: An Integrated Regional Modelling Framework , 2000 .

[29]  Leen Hordijk,et al.  Using computer models in international negotiations , 1999 .

[30]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Learning from integrated assessment of climate change , 1996 .

[31]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[32]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[33]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[34]  Hugh Wilkins,et al.  The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development , 2003 .

[35]  Måns Nilsson,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Citizen interaction with computer models , 2003 .

[36]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[37]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  The Inclusion of Stakeholder Perspectives in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change , 2001 .

[38]  Måns Nilsson,et al.  Exploring the use of computer models in participatory integrated assessment – experiences and recommendations for further steps , 2000 .

[39]  Jeroen P. van der Sluijs,et al.  A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment , 2002 .

[40]  Michael Decker,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment , 2001 .

[41]  Carlo C. Jaeger,et al.  Involving the Public in Climate and Energy Decisions , 2000 .

[42]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  An integrated model for the assessment of the greenhouse effect: The Dutch approach , 1990 .

[43]  Bert de Vries,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions in an Equity-, Environment- and Service-Oriented World: An IMAGE-Based Scenario for the 21st Century , 2000 .

[44]  Pier Vellinga,et al.  The Relevance of Participatory Approaches in Integrated Environmental Assessment , 2001 .

[45]  Martin O'Connor,et al.  Dialogue and debate in a post-normal practice of science: a reflexion , 1999 .

[46]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  Visions for a sustainable Europe , 2000 .

[47]  Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2000 .

[48]  Sarah Lindley.  Virtual tools for complex problems: an overview of the AtlasNW regional interactive sustainability atlas for planning for sustainable development. , 2001 .

[49]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Models at the interface between science and society: impacts and options , 2000 .

[50]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  EMERGENT COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[51]  James Roy King.  Models as Metaphors , 1991 .

[52]  J. R. Ravets,et al.  Post-Normal Science , 2006 .

[53]  Carlo Jaeger,et al.  Citizens’ perspectives on climate change and energy use , 2000 .

[54]  B. Siebenhüner.  Social learning and sustainability science: which role can stakeholder participation play? , 2004 .

[55]  Lothar Funk,et al.  CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (1997). Challenging Neighbours.; Delsen, Lei and Eelke de Jong (eds.) (1998). The German and Dutch Economies , 1999 .

[56]  B. B. Zellner.  Policy Studies: Review Annual , 2018 .