Modelling information resources and their salience in medical device design

The paper describes a model that includes an explicit description of the information resources that are assumed to guide use, enabling a focus on properties of "plausible interactions". The information resources supported by an interactive system should be designed to encourage the correct use of the system. These resources signpost a user's interaction, helping to achieve desired goals. Analysing assumptions about information resource support is particularly relevant when a system is safety critical that is when interaction failure consequences could be dangerous, or walk-up-and-use where interaction failure may lead to reluctance to use with expensive consequences. The paper shows that expressing these resource constraints still provides a wider set of behaviours than would occur in practice. A resource may be more or less salient at a particular stage of the interaction and as a result potentially overlooked. For example, the resource may be accessible but not used because it does not seem relevant to the current goal. The paper describes how the resource framework can be augmented with additional information about the salience of the assumed resources. A medical device that is in common use in many hospitals is used as illustration.

[1]  Monika Richter,et al.  Cognition In The Wild , 2016 .

[2]  Jonathan Back,et al.  Choosing to interleave: human error and information access cost , 2012, CHI.

[3]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Predictive human performance modeling made easy , 2004, CHI.

[4]  Bonnie E. John,et al.  CogTool-Explorer: a model of goal-directed user exploration that considers information layout , 2012, CHI.

[5]  D. N. Ramos-Hernandez,et al.  A novel object-oriented environment for distributed process control systems , 2005 .

[6]  Ellen J. Bass,et al.  Generating phenotypical erroneous human behavior to evaluate human-automation interaction using model checking , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Michael D. Harrison,et al.  Interaction engineering using the IVY tool , 2009, EICS '09.

[8]  Bob Fields,et al.  ANALYSING HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION AS DISTRIBUTED COGNITION: THE RESOURCES MODEL , 1999 .

[9]  Julie Chen,et al.  The bloodhound project: automating discovery of web usability issues using the InfoScentπ simulator , 2003, CHI '03.

[10]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Cognitive Walkthroughs: A Method for Theory-Based Evaluation of User Interfaces , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[11]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Combining human error verification and timing analysis: a case study on an infusion pump , 2013, Formal Aspects of Computing.

[12]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[13]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Michael D. Harrison,et al.  Analysing interactive devices based on information resource constraints , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[16]  Michael D. Harrison,et al.  Integrating Formal Predictions of Interactive System Behaviour with User Evaluation , 2013, IFM.

[17]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  CTTE: Support for Developing and Analyzing Task Models for Interactive System Design , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[18]  Yi Zhang,et al.  A Generic User Interface Architecture for Analyzing Use Hazards in Infusion Pump Software , 2014, MCPS.

[19]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Why Industry Doesn’t Use the Wonderful Notations We Researchers Have Given Them to Reason About Their Designs , 1994 .