MOBILE DEMOCRACY: TEXT MESSAGES, VOTER TURNOUT AND THE 2004 SPANISH GENERAL ELECTION

Mobile phones have the potential to foster political mobilisation. Like the Internet, mobile phones facilitate communication and rapid access to information. Compared to the Internet, however, mobile phone diffusion has reached a larger proportion of the population in most countries, and thus the impact of this new medium is conceivably greater. The Spanish general election of 2004 occurred in the wake of an unprecedented terrorist attack, but its outcome reflects the potential that mobile phones have to provide the user with independent information and bring about voter mobilisation. The impression – whether true or not – that the government was withholding information about the attack outraged a small number of voters who, empowered with mobile phones, sent text messages (known as SMS), resulting in unprecedented flash demonstrations on election day eve. Traditional media outlets contributed further to a growing chorus of citizens who felt misled. Those who tend not to vote, young voters and new voters, were galvanised to go to the polls, and they disproportionately favoured the opposition party. While it is too early to determine the political effects of mobile phone diffusion, the events in Spain suggest that mobile technology may come to play an important role in political participation and democracy.

[1]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  Developing the Internet: entrepreneurship and public policy in Ireland, Singapore, Argentina, and Spain , 2001 .

[2]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[3]  D. Niven.  The Mobilization Calendar , 2002 .

[4]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[5]  Peter Dahlgren.  The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[6]  M. M. Lago,et al.  Elecciones y comportamiento electoral , 1997 .

[7]  Pippa Norris,et al.  Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism , 2002 .

[8]  Zizi Papacharissi.  The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[9]  Narciso Michavila.  Guerra, terrorismo y elecciones: incidencia electoral de los atentados islamistas en Madrid , 2005 .

[10]  Stefaan Walgrave,et al.  New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti‐globalization’ movement , 2002 .

[11]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation , 2005 .

[12]  D. Green,et al.  Get Out the Vote!: How to Increase Voter Turnout , 2004 .

[13]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[14]  John Havick,et al.  The impact of the Internet on a television-based society , 2000 .

[15]  Vicente L. Rafael.  The Cell Phone and the Crowd: Messianic Politics in Recent Philippine History , 2006 .

[16]  J. Yardley.  A Hundred Cellphones Bloom, and Chinese Take to the Streets , 2005 .

[17]  Rod Carveth,et al.  Policy Options to Combat the Digital Divide in Western Europe , 2002, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[18]  Carl J. Cuneo,et al.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2003 .

[19]  A. Nation.  Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet , 2002 .

[20]  L. Fortunati.  The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations , 2002 .