Laser nanosurgery of single microtubules reveals location-dependent depolymerization rates.

In this study, 532-nm picosecond and 800-nm femtosecond lasers are used in combination with fluorescently labeled tubulin to further elucidate microtubule depolymerization and the effect lasers may have on the resulting depolymerization. Depolymerization rates of targeted single microtubules are dependent on location with respect to the nucleus. Microtubules located near the nucleus exhibit a significantly faster depolymerization rate when compared to microtubule depolymerization rates near the periphery of the cell. Microtubules cut with the femtosecond laser depolymerize at a slower rate than unirradiated controls (p=0.002), whereas those cut with the picosecond laser depolymerize at the same rate as unirradiated controls (p=0.704). Our results demonstrate the ability of both the picosecond and femtosecond lasers to cut individual microtubules. The differences between the two ablation results are discussed.

[1]  Kazuyoshi Itoh,et al.  Femtosecond laser disruption of subcellular organelles in a living cell. , 2004, Optics express.

[2]  M W Berns,et al.  Laser-transected microtubules exhibit individuality of regrowth, however most free new ends of the microtubules are stable , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  Peter-Monnik Weg,et al.  Mechanisms of femtosecond laser nanosurgery of cells and tissues , 2005 .

[4]  Michael W Berns,et al.  Internet‐based robotic laser scissors and tweezers microscopy , 2005, Microscopy research and technique.

[5]  V. Magidson,et al.  Regulation of cytokinesis by spindle-pole bodies , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[6]  A. Forer,et al.  Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of microtubules in vitro. The action spectrum for local depolymerization of marginal band microtubules in vitro matches that for reducing birefringence of chromosomal spindle fibres in vivo. , 1988, Journal of cell science.

[7]  P Wadsworth,et al.  Cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in living cells expressing green fluorescent protein-alpha tubulin. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[8]  E. Salmon,et al.  A Metastable Intermediate State of Microtubule Dynamic Instability That Differs Significantly between Plus and Minus Ends , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  A Khodjakov,et al.  A synergy of technologies: combining laser microsurgery with green fluorescent protein tagging. , 1997, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  E D Salmon,et al.  Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  M W Berns,et al.  Laser microsurgery in cell and developmental biology. , 1981, Science.

[12]  Renzo Antolini,et al.  Combined intracellular three-dimensional imaging and selective nanosurgery by a nonlinear microscope. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  B. McEwen,et al.  The de novo centriole assembly pathway in HeLa cells: cell cycle progression and centriole assembly/maturation. , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  D E Ingber,et al.  Pulse energy dependence of subcellular dissection by femtosecond laser pulses. , 2005, Optics express.

[15]  M. Kirschner,et al.  New features of microtubule behaviour observed in vivo , 1988, Nature.

[16]  P Wadsworth,et al.  Observation and quantification of individual microtubule behavior in vivo: microtubule dynamics are cell-type specific , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  E. Salmon,et al.  How microtubules get fluorescent speckles. , 1998, Biophysical Journal.

[18]  A. Vogel,et al.  Mechanisms of femtosecond laser nanosurgery of cells and tissues , 2005 .

[19]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[20]  M W Berns,et al.  Controlled ablation of microtubules using a picosecond laser. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Nasser M. Rusan,et al.  Cell Cycle-Dependent Changes in Microtubule Dynamics in Living Cells Expressing Green Fluorescent Protein-α Tubulin , 2001 .

[22]  T. Kapoor,et al.  Chromosomes Can Congress to the Metaphase Plate Before Biorientation , 2006, Science.

[23]  M. Berns.  Biological microirradiation : classical and laser sources , 1974 .

[24]  S Inoué,et al.  Asymmetric behavior of severed microtubule ends after ultraviolet- microbeam irradiation of individual microtubules in vitro , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Julien Colombelli,et al.  In vivo Selective Cytoskeleton Dynamics Quantification in Interphase Cells Induced by Pulsed Ultraviolet Laser Nanosurgery , 2005, Traffic.

[26]  M W Berns,et al.  Laser microirradiation of the nucleolar organizer in cells of the rat kangaroo (Potorous tridactylis). Reduction of nucleolar number and production of micronucleoli. , 1972, Experimental cell research.

[27]  A. Hyman,et al.  Real-time visualization of cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic extracts , 1990, Cell.

[28]  K J Halbhuber,et al.  Intracellular nanosurgery with near infrared femtosecond laser pulses. , 1999, Cellular and molecular biology.

[29]  Karsten König,et al.  Nanoprocessing with nanojoule near-infrared femtosecond laser pulses , 2005 .

[30]  A. Vogel,et al.  Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues. , 2003, Chemical reviews.