Toward applied behavior analysis of life aloft.

This article deals with systems at multiple levels, at least from cell to organization. It also deals with learning, decision making, and other behavior at multiple levels. Technological development of a human behavioral ecosystem appropriate to space environments requires an analytic and synthetic orientation, explicitly experimental in nature, dictated by scientific and pragmatic considerations, and closely approximating procedures of established effectiveness in other areas of natural science. The conceptual basis of such an approach has its roots in environmentalism which has two main features: (1) knowledge comes from experience rather than from innate ideas, divine revelation, or other obscure sources; and (2) action is governed by consequences rather than by instinct, reason, will, beliefs, attitudes or even the currently fashionable cognitions. Without an experimentally derived data base founded upon such a functional analysis of human behavior, the overgenerality of "ecological systems" approaches render them incapable of ensuring the successful establishment of enduring space habitats. Without an experimentally derived function account of individual behavioral variability, a natural science of behavior cannot exist. And without a natural science of behavior, the social sciences will necessarily remain in their current status as disciplines of less than optimal precision or utility. Such a functional analysis of human performance should provide an operational account of behavior change in a manner similar to the way in which Darwin's approach to natural selection accounted for the evolution of phylogenetic lines (i.e., in descriptive, nonteleological terms). Similarly, as Darwin's account has subsequently been shown to be consonant with information obtained at the cellular level, so too should behavior principles ultimately prove to be in accord with an account of ontogenetic adaptation at a biochemical level. It would thus seem obvious that the most productive conceptual and methodological approaches to long-term research investments focused upon human behavior in space environments will require multidisciplinary inputs from such wide-ranging fields as molecular biology, environmental physiology, behavioral biology, architecture, sociology, and political science, among others.

[1]  B. Skinner,et al.  Giving up the ghost , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  T. Risley,et al.  Shoplifting prevention: providing information through signs. , 1976, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[3]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Language and Memory , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  J. Findley,et al.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  L. Frederiksen,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT , 1981 .

[6]  W. Millard OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR STIMULUS PROPERTIES OF CONSPECIFIC BEHAVIOR , 2005 .

[7]  L. Frederiksen,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1978 .

[8]  B. Skinner,et al.  Symbolic Communication Between Two Pigeons, (Columba livia domestica) , 1980, Science.

[9]  Peter B. Everett,et al.  The effects of a token reinforcement procedure on bus ridership. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[10]  Nathan H. Azrin,et al.  The Token Economy: A Motivational System for Therapy and Rehabilitation , 1968 .

[11]  H. Farris Classical conditioning of courting behavior in the Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  D F Hake,et al.  Acquisition and maintenance of trusting behavior. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  D M THOMPSON,et al.  ESCAPE FROM SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Social Evolution and the Emergence of Leadership. , 1980 .

[16]  W. Baum,et al.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  Richard W. Malott,et al.  IMPROVING ATTENDANCE AT WORK IN A VOLUNTEER FOOD CO-OPERATIVE WITH A TOKEN ECONOMY , 1977 .

[18]  J W Donahoe,et al.  Some implications of a relational principle of reinforcement. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  Steven A. Kopel,et al.  Effects of a token reinforcement system on journal reshelving. , 1977 .

[21]  C. Crowell,et al.  Response deprivation and reinforcement in applied settings: A preliminary analysis. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[22]  R F HEFFERLINE,et al.  Escape and Avoidance Conditioning in Human Subjects without Their Observation of the Response , 1959, Science.

[23]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  S R Hursh,et al.  Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  M. Seligman,et al.  Biological boundaries of learning. , 1972 .

[26]  D. Premack Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement. , 1959, Psychological review.

[27]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Handbook of Operant Behavior , 2022 .

[28]  R. Drabman,et al.  An evaluation of three litter control procedures--trash receptacles, paid workers, and the marked item technique. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[29]  Ralph F. Hefferline,et al.  Proprioceptive Discrimination of a Covert Operant without Its Observation by the Subject , 1963, Science.

[30]  L. K. Miller,et al.  THE DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF A WORKSHARING SYSTEM FOR EXPERIMENTAL GROUP LIVING1 , 1976 .

[31]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Reflexive fighting in response to aversive stimulation. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[32]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Industrial safety hazard reduction through performance feedback. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[33]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  J J Boren,et al.  An experimental social relation between two monkeys. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[35]  L. Eldridge,et al.  A PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK INTERVENTION TO REDUCE WASTE: PERFORMANCE DATA AND PARTICIPANT RESPONSES , 1978 .

[36]  B. Skinner Contingencies of reinforcement : a theoretical analysis , 1969 .

[37]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  The experimental analysis of behavior : a biological perspective , 1979 .

[38]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[39]  J. Falk The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. , 1971, Physiology & behavior.

[40]  J. Brady,et al.  FACILITATION OF LARGE RATIO PERFORMANCE BY USE OF CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT. , 1965, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[41]  J. Kagel,et al.  Behavioral economics: areas of cooperative research between economics and applied behavioral analysis. , 1972, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[42]  W O EVANS,et al.  Producing either positive or negative tendencies to a stimulus associated with shock. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.