A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques

Abstract The proposal of this basic protocol is an attempt to reach better agreement and uniformity concerning the methodology for functional assessment of pathologic voices. The purpose is to allow relevant comparisons with the literature when presenting / publishing the results of voice treatment, e.g. a phonosurgical technique, or a new / improved instrument or procedure for investigating the pathological voice. Meta-analyses of the results of voice treatments are generally limited and may even be impossible owing to the major diversity in the ways functional outcomes are assessed. A multidimensional set of minimal basic measurements suitable for all “common” dysphonias is proposed. It includes five different approaches: perception (grade, roughness, breathiness), videostroboscopy (closure, regularity, mucosal wave and symmetry), acoustics (jitter, shimmer, Fo-range and softest intensity), aerodynamics (phonation quotient), and subjective rating by the patient. The protocol is elaborated on the basis of an exhaustive review of the literature, of the experience of the Committee members, and of plenary discussions within the European Laryngological Society. Instrumentation is kept to a minimum, but it is considered essential for professionals performing phonosurgery.

[1]  M. Hirano,et al.  Maximum phonation time and air usage during phonation. Clinical study. , 1968, Folia phoniatrica.

[2]  O Hallén,et al.  Evaluation of Teflon injection procedures for paralytic dysphonia. , 1974, Folia phoniatrica.

[3]  T Murry,et al.  Aerodynamic Relationships Associated with Normal Phonation and Paralytic Dysphonia , 1978, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  G. S. Neiman,et al.  Procedural aspects of eliciting maximum phonation time. , 1981, Folia phoniatrica.

[5]  M. Hirano,et al.  Clinical Examination of Voice , 1981 .

[6]  D Rau,et al.  Aerodynamic assessment of vocal function using hand-held spirometers. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[7]  Britta Hammarberg,et al.  Perceptual and acoustic analysis of dysphonia , 1986 .

[8]  R H Colton,et al.  Phonatory Airflow Analysis in Patients with Laryngeal Disease , 1987, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Maximum performance tests of speech production. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[10]  Robert T. Sataloff,et al.  A simple technique for consistent microphone placement in voice recording , 1988 .

[11]  J Lebacq,et al.  Laryngostroboscopy and glottic dysrhythmia's. , 1989, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.

[12]  M. Hirano Objective evaluation of the human voice: clinical aspects. , 1989, Folia phoniatrica.

[13]  Jason Goodwin,et al.  Voice disorders. , 1991, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[14]  H. K. Schutte,et al.  The Efficiency of Voice Production , 1992 .

[15]  I. Titze,et al.  Acoustic interpretation of the voice range profile (phonetogram). , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  H. K. Schutte,et al.  INTEGRATED AERODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS , 1992 .

[17]  R. Eccles,et al.  Relationships between vital capacity, height and nasal airway resistance in asymptomatic volunteers. , 1992, Rhinology.

[18]  I. Titze Phonation threshold pressure: a missing link in glottal aerodynamics. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  I. Titze,et al.  Comparison of Fo extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  D. Bless,et al.  Videostroboscopic examination of the larynx , 1993 .

[21]  R. Colton,et al.  Aerodynamic and stroboscopic findings before and after microlaryngeal phonosurgery. , 1994, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[22]  B Hammarberg,et al.  Glottal closure, transglottal airflow, and voice quality in healthy middle-aged women. , 1995, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[23]  Deyun Wang,et al.  Concentrations of myeloperoxidase in nasal secretions of atopic patients after nasal allergen challenge and during the natural allergen exposure. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1996, 110:85-90 , 1996 .

[24]  G Molenberghs,et al.  Research work of the Belgian Study Group on Voice Disorders 1996. Results. , 1996, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.

[25]  E Fresnel-Elbaz,et al.  Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. , 1996, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.

[26]  D. G. Miller,et al.  Standardized laryngeal videostroboscopic rating: differences between untrained and trained male and female subjects, and effects of varying sound intensity, fundamental frequency, and age. , 1996, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[27]  J Lebacq,et al.  Acoustic, perceptual, aerodynamic and anatomical correlations in voice pathology. , 1996, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[28]  C. Newman,et al.  The Voice Handicap Index (VHI)Development and Validation , 1997 .

[29]  V Wolfe,et al.  Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types. , 1997, Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics.

[30]  P. van de Heyning,et al.  Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. , 1997, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[31]  F L Wuyts,et al.  Evaluation of the vocal performance of children using a voice range profile index. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  P. Dejonckere,et al.  Effect of louder voicing on acoustical measurements in dysphonic patients , 1998 .

[33]  P. Dejonckere Teflon injection and thyroplasty: objective and subjective outcomes. , 1998, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.

[34]  Quantitative rating of video-laryngostroboscopy: a reliability study. , 1998, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.

[35]  G. Friedrich Externe Stimmlippenmedialisation: Funktionelle Ergebnisse , 1998 .

[36]  F L Wuyts,et al.  Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[37]  G Molenberghs,et al.  The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[38]  P. Dejonckere Clinical implementation of a multidimensional basic protocol for assessing functional results of voice therapy. A preliminary study. , 2000, Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie.