LED-Induced fluorescence and image analysis to detect stink bug damage in cotton bolls

BackgroundStink bugs represent a major agricultural pest complex attacking more than 200 wild and cultivated plants, including cotton in the southeastern US. Stink bug feeding on developing cotton bolls will cause boll abortion or lint staining and thus reduced yield and lint value. Current methods for stink bug detection involve manual harvesting and cracking open of a sizable number of immature cotton bolls for visual inspection. This process is cumbersome, time consuming, and requires a moderate level of experience to obtain accurate estimates. To improve detection of stink bug feeding, we present here a method based on fluorescent imaging and subsequent image analyses to determine the likelihood of stink bug damage in cotton bolls.ResultsDamage to different structures of cotton bolls including lint and carpal wall can be observed under blue LED-induced fluorescence. Generally speaking, damaged regions fluoresce green, whereas non-damaged regions with chlorophyll fluoresce red. However, similar fluorescence emission is also observable on cotton bolls that have not been fed upon by stink bugs. Criteria based on fluorescent intensity and the size of the fluorescent spot allow to differentiate between true positives (fluorescent regions associated with stink bug feeding) and false positives (fluorescent regions due to other causes). We found a detection rates with two combined criteria of 87% for true-positive marks and of 8% for false-positive marks.ConclusionsThe imaging technique presented herein gives rise to a possible detection apparatus where a cotton boll is imaged in the field and images processed by software. The unique fluorescent signature left by stink bugs can be used to determine with high probability if a cotton boll has been punctured by a stink bug. We believe this technique, when integrated in a suitable device, could be used for more accurate detection in the field and allow for more optimized application of pest control.

[1]  J. Eger,et al.  Stink Bugs of Economic Importance in America North of Mexico , 2002 .

[2]  P. Roberts,et al.  Identification and Management of Common Boll-Feeding Bugs in Cotton Introduction Increased Importance of Boll-Feeding Bugs in Cotton , 2006 .

[3]  Steven M. Brown.  Cotton: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. , 2000 .

[4]  B. R. Leonard,et al.  Influence of Nezara viridula Feeding on Cotton Yield, Fiber Quality, and Seed Germination , 2007, Journal of economic entomology.

[5]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Southern Green Stink Bug, Nezara viridula (L.), Injury to Macadamia Nut , 1965 .

[6]  R. Nichols,et al.  Temporal Analysis of Cotton Boll Symptoms Resulting From Southern Green Stink Bug Feeding and Transmission of a Bacterial Pathogen , 2009, Journal of economic entomology.

[7]  William R. Brody,et al.  Segmentation algorithms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[8]  H. Chi.  Timing of Control Based on the Stage Structure of Pest Populations: A Simulation Approach , 1990 .

[9]  B. R. Leonard,et al.  Injury to Preflowering and Flowering Cotton by Brown Stink Bug and Southern Green Stink Bug , 2004, Journal of economic entomology.

[10]  Ahmad Khalilian,et al.  Temporal Dynamics and Electronic Nose Detection of Stink Bug-Induced Volatile Emissions from Cotton Bolls , 2012 .

[11]  J. Mcpherson,et al.  Stink Bugs of Economic Importance in America North of Mexico , 2000 .

[12]  A. Bell,et al.  Transmission of cotton seed and boll rotting bacteria by the southern green stink bug (Nezara viridula L.) , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[13]  Mark A. Haidekker,et al.  Advanced Biomedical Image Analysis , 2010 .

[14]  J. R. Bradley,et al.  Reduction in Yield and Quality of Cotton Damaged by Green Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) , 1990 .

[15]  N. Toscano,et al.  Cotton Yield and Quality Loss Caused by Various Levels of Stink Bug Infestations , 1976 .

[16]  M. Toews,et al.  Feeding Preference and Movement of Nezara viridula and Euschistus servus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on Individual Cotton Plants , 2012, Journal of economic entomology.

[17]  C. W. Smith,et al.  Rice: origin, history, technology and production. , 1999 .

[18]  R. B. Reeves,et al.  Spatial Dynamics of Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and Associated Boll Injury in Southeastern Cotton Fields , 2010, Environmental entomology.

[19]  Ahmad Khalilian,et al.  Detecting Stink Bugs/Damage in Cotton Utilizing a Portable Electronic Nose , 2006 .

[20]  David W. Onstad,et al.  Calculation of Economic-injury Levels and Economic Thresholds for Pest Management , 1987 .

[21]  R. B. Reeves,et al.  Development of Sampling Plans For Cotton Bolls Injured by Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) , 2010, Journal of economic entomology.

[22]  A. Panizzi.  Wild hosts of Pentatomids: ecological significance and role in their pest status on crops. , 1997, Annual review of entomology.

[23]  M. Toews,et al.  Stink Bug Feeding Induces Fluorescence in Developing Cotton Bolls , 2011, Journal of biological engineering.

[24]  S. Turnipseed,et al.  Boll Damage by Southern Green Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and Tarnished Plant Bug (Hemiptera: Miridae) Caged on Transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis Cotton , 1999 .